Log in

Predictive factors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Despite endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) being the standard best treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), there still remains a high recurrence rate of nasal polyps after ESS. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of ESS in the treatment of CRSwNP and identify possible predictors for revision surgery.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients with CRSwNP submitted to ESS between the years 2013 and 2021.

Results

We analyzed 517 cases, of which 15.1% were submitted to revision ESS. The presence of hyposmia/anosmia, asthma, intolerance/allergy to non-steroid inflammatory drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease, and bilateral polyposis were more frequent in patients who needed revision surgery. Initial values of peripheral eosinophilia and Lund–Mackay scores were significantly higher in this sub-group of patients. Lund–Mackay score was the only independent risk factor for revision surgery.

Conclusions

Factors like peripheral eosinophilia and Lund–Mackay score were associated with a higher probability of revision ESS. Applying these concepts to the clinical practice could help predict the evolution of patient’s pathology in the post-operative period and identify in advance those cases that may need a multidisciplinary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C et al (2020) European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology 2020(Suppl 29):1–464

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lilja M, Koskinen A, Julkunen-Iivari A et al (2022) Radiological score of computed tomography scans predicts revision surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 42:63–74. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tao X, Chen F, Sun Y et al (2018) Prediction models for postoperative uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis in daily practice. Laryngoscope 128:2673–2680. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gill AS, Smith KA, Meeks H et al (2021) Asthma increases long-term revision rates of endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 11:1197–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22779

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Aslan F, Altun E, Paksoy S, Turan G (2017) Could Eosinophilia predict clinical severity in nasal polyps? Multidiscip Respir Med 12:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-017-0102-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fokkens WJ, Reitsma S (2019) Proposal for an algorithm on the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McHugh T, Snidvongs K, **e M et al (2018) High tissue eosinophilia as a marker to predict recurrence for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:1421–1429. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boztepe OF, Gün T, Demir M et al (2016) A novel predictive marker for the recurrence of nasal polyposis following endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 273:1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3753-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kara A, Guven M, Yilmaz MS et al (2018) Are neutrophil, platelet and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and red blood cell distribution width can be used for nasal polyposis? Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 275:409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4821-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brescia G, Pedruzzi B, Barion U et al (2016) Are neutrophil-, eosinophil-, and basophil-to-lymphocyte ratios useful markers for pinpointing patients at higher risk of recurrent sinonasal polyps? Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg 37:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R et al (2007) The Lund-Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velosoteles R, Cerejeira R (2017) Endoscopic sinus surgery for Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: clinical outcome and predictive factors of recurrence. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31:56–62. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alsharif S, Jonstam K, van Zele T et al (2019) Endoscopic sinus surgery for type-2 CRS wNP: an endotype-based retrospective study. Laryngoscope 129:1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomes SC, Cavaliere C, Masieri S et al (2022) Reboot surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: recurrence and smell kinetics. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07470-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bachert C, Zhang N, Hellings PW, Bousquet J (2018) Endotype-driven care pathways in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 141:1543–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Aguiar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguiar, C., Valente, P., Medeiros, N. et al. Predictive factors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3265–3269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07856-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07856-7

Keywords

Navigation