Abstract
Purpose
Radical trachelectomy (RT) with pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a new treatment option for young patients with uterine cervical cancer stages 1A2–1B1 who desire the preservation of their fertility. However, the application of RT for pregnant patients is still controversial. We comparatively studied both obstetrical and oncological outcomes of pregnant patients who underwent vaginal RT during pregnancy and those who underwent vaginal RT before pregnancy.
Methods
Both obstetrical and oncological results of eight patients who underwent vaginal RT with pelvic lymphadenectomy during pregnancy in our institute between 2010 and 2020 (Group A), and ten pregnant patients who underwent vaginal RT with pelvic lymphadenectomy before pregnancy during the same period (Group B) were reviewed based on their medical charts.
Results
There were neither significant differences in blood loss, surgical time, or surgical completeness between Group A and Group B, nor were there significant differences in obstetrical outcomes between the two groups. However, two of the eight patients in Group A had recurrence of the cancer. None of the patients in Group B has shown any signs of recurrence thus far.
Conclusion
Vaginal RT during pregnancy does not affect the obstetrical prognoses of patients with early invasive uterine cervical cancer, and it might be a tolerable treatment modality for them. However, oncologically, it should be performed carefully as there is a risk of recurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Data will be available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Perrone AM, Bovicelli A, D’Andrill G et al (2019) Cervical cancer in pregnancy: analysis of literature and innovative approaches. J Cell Physiol 234:14975–14990
Kobayashi Y, Tabata T, Omori M et al (2019) A Japanese survey of malignant disease in pregnancy. Int J Clin Oncol 24:328–333
Monk BJ, Montz FJ (1992) Invasive cervical cancer complicating intrauterine pregnancy: treatment with radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 80:199–203
Watanabe Y, Tsuritani M, Kataoka T et al (2009) Radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of a single institute experience. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 30:79–81
Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P (2000) Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 88:1877–1882
Shinkai S, Ishioka S, Mariya T et al (2020) Pregnancies after vaginal radical trachelectomy (RT) in patients with early invasive uterine cervical cancer: results from a single institute. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02949-1
Amant F, Berveiller P, Boere IA et al (2019) Gynecologic cancers in Pregnancy : guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting. Ann Oncol 30:1601–1612
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S et al (2019) Cervical canaccer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:64–84
Plante M (2013) Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer:radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23:982–989
Okugawa K, Kobayashi H, Sonoda K et al (2017) Oncological and obstetric outcomes and complications during pregnancy after fertility-sparing abdominal trachelectomy for cervical cancer: a retrospective review. Int J Clin Oncol 22:340–346
Takada S, Ishioka S, Endo T et al (2013) Difficulty in the management of pregnancy after vaginal radical trachelectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 18:1085–1090
Ungar L, Smith JR, Palfalvi L et al (2006) Abdominal radical rachelectomy during pregnancy to preserve pregnancy and fertility. Obstet Gynecol 108:811–814
Douligeris A, Prodromidou A, Psomiadou V et al (2020) Abdominal radical trachelectomy during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 49:101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.07.003 (Epub 2019 Jul 2)
Karateke A, Cam C, Celik C et al (2010) Radical trachelectomy in late pregnancy: Is it an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol and Reprod Biol 152:112–113
Aoki Y, Inamine M, Ohishi S et al (2014) Radical abdominal trachelectomy for 1B1 cervical cancer at 17 weeks of gestation: a case report and literature review. Case Rep in Obstet Gynecol 2014:926502. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/926502
Umemoto M, Ishioka S, Mizugaki Y et al (2019) Obstetrical prognosis of patients who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy (RT) during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45:1167–1172
Reiter S, Spadt SK (2019) Bacterial vaginosis: a primer for clinicians. Postgrad Med 131:8–18
Yoshihara K, Ishiguro T, Chihara M et al (2018) The safety and effectiveness of abdominal radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol cancer 28:782–787
Botha MH, Rajaram S, Karunaratne K (2018) Cancer in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 143:137–142
Gizzo S, Ancina E, Saccardi C et al (2013) Radical trachelectomy: the first step of fertility preservation in young women with cervical cancer (Review). Oncol Rep 30:2545–2554
Capilna ME, Szabo B, Besci J et al (2016) Radical trachelectomy performed during pregnancy. A review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:758–762
Kim M, Ishioka S, Endo T et al (2016) Possibility of less radical treatment for patients with early invasive uterine cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42:876–882
Rodolakis A, Thomakos N, Sotiropoulou M et al (2018) Abdominal radical trahelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer during pregnancy: a provocative surgical approach. Overview of the literature and a single-institute experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28:1743–1750
Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R et al (2013) Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(Suppl 6):vi160–vi170
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SS, SI, TM, and TS designed the research. All the authors attended the management of each patients as a treatment team. SS, YF, MK, and MS analyzed data. SI and TS supervised the research. SS, SI, and TS wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
This study adhered to the tenets of Declaration of Helsinki, and the study design was reviewed and approved by the Sapporo medical university’s review board and the ethics committee (approval number:05–26). Permission to access and to use these data was also approved.
Consent to participate
A written informed consent to participate in the study and to publish the report was obtained from each patient.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shinkai, S., Ishioka, S., Mariya, T. et al. Does radical trachelectomy (RT) during pregnancy have higher obstetrical and oncological risks than RT before pregnancy?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306, 189–197 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06327-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06327-w