Abstract
Purpose
To assess the association between operative hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and cervical insufficiency (CI) in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The charts of all women who got pregnant following an ART cycle between January 2015 and June 2018 were reviewed. The study group consisted of pregnant women who underwent operative hysteroscopy within 6 months before conception. The control group consisted of pregnant women who did not undergo hysteroscopy or any type of cervical surgical procedure before conception. The primary outcome measure was CI during the second trimester (13–27 weeks of gestation).
Results
A total of 363 pregnancies achieved by ART cycles were assessed. After the exclusion of multiple pregnancies (n = 19), previous surgical procedures (n = 4) and first-trimester pregnancy losses (n = 80), there were 29 women in the study group and 231 women in the control group. The mean ages of the study and control groups were 31.2 ± 4.06 and 29.82 ± 4.71 years, respectively (P = 0.13). The indications for operative hysteroscopy were uterine septum (n = 19), T-shaped uterus (n = 4), endometrial polyp (n = 4), and submucosal fibroids (n = 2). The rates of CI in the study and control groups were 13.7% (4/29) and 3.4% (8/231), respectively (P = 0.012). The term delivery rates in the study and control groups were 79.3 and 91.8%, respectively (P = 0.044).
Conclusions
Operative hysteroscopy prior to ART cycles is significantly associated with CI between 13 and 27 weeks of gestation. Further investigation with larger cohorts is urgently needed to clarify this issue.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00404-020-05863-1/MediaObjects/404_2020_5863_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material (data transparency)
This is a retrospective analysis of our hospital records, and we cannot share data without informing the patients about we will share their medical records.
References
Michels T, Tiu A (2007) Second trimester pregnancy lLoss. Am Fam Phys 76:134–136. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2007/1101/p1341.html
ACOG (2014) Practice Bulletin No. 142. Obstet Gynecol (Internet) 123(2, part 1):372–379. https://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006250-201402000-00033
Sundtoft I, Langhoff-Roos J, Sandager P, Sommer S, Uldbjerg N (2017) Cervical collagen is reduced in non-pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency and a short cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(8):984–990
Shellhaas CS, Iams JD (1998) Ambulatory management of preterm labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 41(3):491–502
Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A et al (1996) The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 334(9):567–572
Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P (1995) Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172(4 Pt 1):1096–1097
Rust OA, Atlas RO, Reed J, van Gaalen J, Balducci J (2001) Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(5):1098–1105
Petersen L, Uldbjerg N (1996) Cervical collagen in non-pregnant women with previous cervical incompetence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 67:41–45
Myers K, Socrate S, Tzeranis D, House M (2009) Changes in the biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human cervical stroma during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144(Suppl):S82–S89
Iqbal SMA, Deska-Gauthier D, Kreplak L (2019) Assessing collagen fibrils molecular damage after a single stretch–release cycle. Soft Matter 15(30):6237–6246
Oxlund BS, Ørtoft G, Brüel A, Danielsen CC, Oxlund H, Uldbjerg N (2010) Cervical collagen and biomechanical strength in non-pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8:1–10
Rechberger T, Uldbjerg N, Oxlund H (1988) Connective tissue changes in the cervix during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by cervical incompetence. Obstet Gynecol 71(4):563–567
House M, Kaplan DL, Socrate S (2009) Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 33(5):300–307
Westergren-Thorsson G, Norman M, Bjornsson S, Endresen U, Stjernholm Y, Ekman G et al (1998) Differential expressions of mRNA for proteoglycans, collagens and transforming growth factor-beta in the human cervix during pregnancy and involution. Biochim Biophys Acta 1406(2):203–213
Roman A, Suhag A, Berghella V (2016) Overview of cervical insufficiency: diagnosis, etiologies, and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 59(2):237–240
Al-Turki HA (2018) Hysteroscopy as an investigation tool in recurrent implantation failure in vitro fertilization. Saudi Med J 39(3):243–246
Weiss A, Shalev E, Romano S (2005) Hysteroscopy may be justified after two miscarriages. Hum Reprod 20(9):2628–2631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei081
ACOG Technology Assessment No (2018) 13: Hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol 131(5):e151–e156
Grunberger W, Riss P (1979) Cervical incompetence after previous cervical dilatation and curettage (author’s transl). Wien Med Wochenschr 129(14):390–392
Converse MI, Walther RG, Ingram JT, Li Y, Yu SM, Monson KL (2018) Detection and characterization of molecular-level collagen damage in overstretched cerebral arteries. Acta Biomater 67:307–318
Yamamoto Y, Smith RR, Bernanke DH (1992) Mechanism of action of balloon angioplasty in cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgery 30(1):1–6
Granstrom L, Ekman G, Ulmsten U, Malmstrom A (1989) Changes in the connective tissue of corpus and cervix uteri during ripening and labour in term pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96(10):1198–1202
Dudenhausen JW, Kunze M, Wittwer-Backofen U, Hagenah HP, Strauss A, Gunther V et al (2018) The relationship between maternal age, body mass index, and the rate of preterm birth. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 19(4):182–186
Sukur YE, Yakistiran B, Ozmen B, Sonmezer M, Berker B, Atabekoglu C (2018) Hysteroscopic corrections for complete Septate and T-shaped uteri have similar surgical and reproductive outcome. Reprod Sci 25(12):1649–1654
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AG: data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing, and data analysis. YEŞ: data collection or management, manuscript writing/editing, and data analysis. BÖ: data collection or management and manuscript writing/editing. MS: data collection or management and manuscript writing/editing. BB: data collection or management and manuscript writing/editing. RA: data collection or management and manuscript writing/editing. CSA: protocol/project development and manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors of this article report no financial or non-financial conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ankara University (Approval no. and date: 8484 and 02.12.2020).
Consent to participate
In our country, IRB does not require consent to participate form for retrospective analyses, they just need of chief physician’s permission.
Consent for publication
All the authors declare that they participated in the study and development in manuscript titled “The association between operative hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technology and cervical insufficiency in second trimester”. In addition, they give their consent for the article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gökçe, A., Şükür, Y.E., Özmen, B. et al. The association between operative hysteroscopy prior to assisted reproductive technology and cervical insufficiency in second trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 303, 1347–1352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05863-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05863-1