Abstract
Background
The optimal internal fixation for non-displaced femoral neck fractures remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) with parallel screws (PS) in treating femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
Materials and methods
A total of 218 patients who underwent internal fixation were randomized to receive either a percutaneous compression plate (PCCP group) or parallel screws (PS group) using a computerized random sequence generator which was used to assign the order of randomization. Patients were assessed by the operating time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin level drop, postoperative hospital stay, the time to full weight-bearing, reduction quality, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, and postoperative complications.
Results
There was no significant difference between PCCP and PS groups regarding operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin level drop, postoperative hospital stays, reduction quality, and Harris hip score (p > 0.05). The time to full weight-bearing and the fracture healing time in the PCCP group were shorter than those in the PS group (p < 0.05). The overall complication rates were slightly lower in the PCCP compared to the PS patients, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, the implant failure rate was significantly higher in the PS group compared to the PCCP group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
The present study suggests that the PCCP is superior to the parallel screws fixation in the treatment of non-displaced elderly femoral neck fractures in terms of earlier full weight-bearing, shorter fracture healing time, and lower implant failure rate. Therefore, it may be a better therapeutic strategy for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-023-05029-z/MediaObjects/402_2023_5029_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-023-05029-z/MediaObjects/402_2023_5029_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00402-023-05029-z/MediaObjects/402_2023_5029_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Zhu J, Deng X, Hu H, Cheng X, Tan Z, Zhang Y (2022) Comparison of the effect of rhombic and inverted triangle configurations of cannulated screws on internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Orthop Surg 14(4):720–729
Zhang YZ, Lin Y, Li C, Yue XJ, Li GY, Wang B et al (2022) A comparative analysis of femoral neck system and three cannulated screws fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a six-month follow-up. Orthop Surg 14(4):686–693
Veronese N, Maggi S (2018) Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury 49(8):1458–1460
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18(Suppl 1):S57–S63
Rogmark C, Leonardsson O (2016) Hip arthroplasty for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. Bone Joint J 98-B(3):291–297
Xu DF, Bi FG, Ma CY, Wen ZF, Cai XZ (2017) A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis. J Orthop Surg Res 12(1):28
Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (1991) Non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. A prospective study of 170 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73-B(6):950–954
Okike K, Hasegawa IG (2021) Current trends in the evaluation and management of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29(4):e154–e164
Taha ME, Audigé L, Siegel G, Renner N (2015) Factors predicting secondary displacement after non-operative treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(2):243–249
Okike K, Udogwu UN, Isaac M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Bhandari M et al (2019) Not all garden-i and ii femoral neck fractures in the elderly should be fixed: effect of posterior tilt on rates of subsequent arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(20):1852–1859
Xu X, Fan J, Zhou F, Lv Y, Tian Y, Ji H et al (2023) Comparison of femoral neck system to multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Injury 54(Supple 2):S28–S35
Ma JX, Kuang MJ, **ng F, Zhao YL, Chen HT, Zhang LK et al (2018) Sliding hip screw versus cannulated cancellous screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults: a systematic review. Int J Surg 52:89–97
Lee YS, Chen SH, Tsuang YH, Huang HL, Lo TY, Huang CR (2008) Internal fixation of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparison of fixation methods. J Trauma 64(1):155–162
Zafari H, Hoveidaei AH, Mortazavi SJ (2021) Internal fixation using screw in undisplaced femoral neck fracture: educational corner. J Orthop Spine Trauma 7(1):20–23
Nauth A, Creek AT, Zellar A, Lawendy A-R, Dowrick A, Gupta A et al (2017) Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389(10078):1519–1527
Gupta M, Arya RK, Kumar S, Jain VK, Sinha S, Naik AK (2016) Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults. Chin J Traumatol 19(04):209–212
Ju FX, Hou RX, **ong J, Shi HF, Chen YX, Wang JF (2020) Outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated internal fixation in elderly patients: a long-term follow-up study. Orthop Surg 12(3):809–818
Lu Q, Tang G, Zhao X, Guo S, Cai B, Li Q (2017) Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation in super-aged patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a 5-year follow-up of randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(1):27–35
Rogmark C, Flensburg L, Fredin H (2009) Undisplaced femoral neck fractures-no problems? A consecutive study of 224 patients treated with internal fixation. Injury 40(3):274–276
Do LND, Kruke TM, Foss OA, Basso T (2016) Reoperations and mortality in 383 patients operated with parallel screws for Garden I-II femoral neck fractures with up to ten years follow-up. Injury 47(12):2739–2742
Zhu F, Liu G, Shao H-G, Wang Y-J, Li R-Q, Yang H-L et al (2015) Treatment of femoral neck fracture with percutaneous compression plate: preliminary results in 74 patients. Orthop Surg 7(2):132–137
Gomez-Vallejo J, Blanco-Rubio N, Lorenzo-Lopez R, Embarba-Gascon M, Ezquerra-Herrando L, Zamora-Lozano M et al (2021) Outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP). Injury 52:S42–S46
** Z-Y, Gu C, Yang H-L, Xu M (2022) Outcome of percutaneous compression plate for treatment of femoral neck fractures: mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Int Orthop 46(8):1891–1898
Brandt E, Verdonschot N, van Vugt A, van Kampen A (2006) Biomechanical analysis of the percutaneous compression plate and sliding hip screw in intracapsular hip fractures: experimental assessment using synthetic and cadaver bones. Injury 37(10):979–983
Brandt SE, Lefever S, Janzing HMJ, Broos PLO, Pilot P, Houben BJJ (2002) Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) versus the dynamic hip screw for pertrochanteric hip fractures: preliminary results. Injury 33(5):413–418
Wang T, Sun JY, Zha GC, Jiang T, You ZJ, Yuan DJ (2014) Analysis of risk factors for femoral head necrosis after internal fixation in femoral neck fractures. Orthopedics 37(12):e1117–e1123
Parker MJ, White A, Boyle A (2008) Fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures. Injury 39(7):791–795
Gjertsen J-E, Engesæter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T et al (2008) The norwegian hip fracture register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop 79(5):583–593
Yih-Shiunn L, Chien-Rae H, Wen-Yun L (2007) Surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthop 31(5):677–682
Filipov O (2011) Biplane double-supported screw fixation (F-technique): a method of screw fixation at osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck. Eur J Orthop Surg Tr 21(7):539–543
Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D et al (2017) Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable pauwels iii femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma 31(3):131–137
Chen J-y, She G-r, Luo S-m, Wu W-r, Zhuang T-f, Huan S-w et al (2020) Hemiarthroplasty compared with internal fixation for treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study. Injury 51(4):1021–1024
Shen J, Luo F, Sun D, Huang Q, Xu J, Dong S et al (2015) Mid-term results after treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP). Injury 46(2):347–357
Koval KJ, Sala DA, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD (1998) Postoperative weight-bearing after a fracture of the femoral neck or an intertrochanteric fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(3):352–356
Kim JW, Byun S-E, Chang JS (2014) The clinical outcomes of early internal fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fractures and early full weight-bearing in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):941–946
Atzmon R, Drexler M, Ohana N, Nyska M, Palmanovich E, Dubin J (2022) The effect of postoperative weight-bearing status on mortality rate following proximal femoral fractures surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(6):947–953
Sjöstedt Å, Zetterberg C, Hansson T, Hult E, Ekström L (1994) Bone mineral content and fixation strength of femoral neck fractures: a cadaver study. Acta Orthop Scan 65(2):161–165
Zhu J, Hu H, Deng X, Zhang Y, Cheng X, Tan Z et al (2021) Nomogram for predicting reoperation following internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):544
Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, de Oliveira AN, Sellenschloh K, Nüchtern J et al (2011) A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J Trauma Acute Care 71(3):625–634
Chen Y, Li H, Dai L, Yin Q, Li D, Wang X (2021) Imaging observation of percutaneous compression plate use in promoting femoral neck fracture healing. J Int Med Res 49(8):03000605211033501
Shu D-P, **ao Y-P, Bei M-J, Ji T, Peng Y-J, Ma B et al (2020) Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Dis 21(1):230
Yin H, Pan Z, Jiang H (2018) Is dynamic locking plate (Targon FN) a better choice for treating of intracapsular hip fracture? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:30–34
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82102535).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declared that no conflicts of interest specifically relevant to this study.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Yin, H., Zhao, X. et al. Comparison of percutaneous compression plate to parallel screws in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143, 7063–7071 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05029-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-05029-z