Log in

Langzeiterfolg nach Vorhofflimmerablation

Long-term success after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die aktuelle Datenlage zur langfristigen Effektivität der Vorhofflimmerablation ist umfangreich und limitiert zugleich. Die Pulmonalvenenisolation (PVI) ist dabei der einzige etablierte Endpunkt mit reproduzierbarer Wirksamkeit. Definierte und in ihrer Effektivität reproduzierbare Therapiestrategien für Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen Formen von Vorhofflimmern fehlen bislang. Für Patienten mit persistierendem Vorhofflimmern und fortgeschrittenem Substrat müssen mehrere Eingriffe mit z. T. komplexeren Ablationsstrategien in Betracht gezogen werden, um die Wahrscheinlichkeit von stabilem Sinusrhythmus zu erhöhen. Die Langzeiterfolgsraten nach einem einzelnen Eingriff werden für Patienten mit paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern mit 60–70 % und nach wiederholten Eingriffen mit bis zu 80 % angegeben. Die Erfolgsraten bei persistierendem oder langanhaltend persistierendem Vorhofflimmern sind weniger überzeugend (Primäreingriff: 40–50 %, multiple Eingriffe: ca. 70 %). Daher ist eine frühzeitige Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern zu empfehlen, um den Progress der Erkrankung und des atrialen Substrats aufzuhalten. Darüber hinaus ist sie der medikamentösen Therapie hinsichtlich der Effektivität überlegen.

Abstract

Ablation is an established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with convincing success rates and a reasonable safety profile. Ablation strategies going beyond pulmonary vein isolation in patients with chronic forms of AF are less well established and reproducible. Especially in patients with progressed AF forms multiple ablation procedures might be mandatory to achieve reasonable clinical success. An early ablation strategy might stop or prolong the progress from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In addition, ablation is more effective than drug-based treatment and comparably safe. Long-term success rates after a single and after multiple ablation procedures in paroxysmal AF are reported with 60–70% and up to 80%, while success rates in persistent or long-standing persistent AF are less favorable (single procedure 40–50%, multiple procedures 70%). However, currently non-recurrence of AF is the most established but potentially not the best endpoint. The burden of AF after ablation as assessed by novel monitoring modalities might gain further clinical importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L et al (2017) 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Heart Rhythm 14(10):e445–e494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C et al (2020) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J

  3. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G et al (1998) Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 339(10):659–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganesan AN, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, Kuklik P, Lau DH, Lim HS et al (2013) Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2(2):e4549

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks S, Metzner A, Wohlmuth P, Lin T, Wissner E, Tilz R et al (2018) Insights into ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: lessons from 6‑year clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29(2):257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tilz RR, Rillig A, Thum AM, Arya A, Wohlmuth P, Metzner A et al (2012) Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 5‑year outcomes of the Hamburg Sequential Ablation Strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(19):1921–1929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarnette JA, Brooks AG, Mahajan R, Elliott AD, Twomey DJ, Pathak RK et al (2018) Outcomes of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 20(FI_3):f366–f376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaita F, Scaglione M, Battaglia A, Matta M, Gallo C, Galata M et al (2018) Very long-term outcome following transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Are results maintained after 10 years of follow up? Europace 20(3):443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, Bernick J, Redpath CJ, Szczotka A et al (2016) Relationship between pulmonary vein Reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2(4):474–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, Hachiya H, Mavrakis H, Deger FT et al (2005) Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double lasso technique. Circulation 111(2):127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuck KH, Albenque JP, Chun KJ, Furnkranz A, Busch M, Elvan A et al (2019) Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 12(6):e7247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin D, Santangeli P, Zado ES, Bala R, Hutchinson MD, Riley MP et al (2015) Electrophysiologic findings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(4):371–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sotomi Y, Inoue K, Ito N, Kimura R, Toyoshima Y, Masuda M et al (2013) Incidence and risk factors for very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Europace 15(11):1581–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erhard N, Mauer T, Ouyang F, Sciacca V, Rillig A, Reissmann B et al (2023) Mechanisms of late arrhythmia recurrence after initially successful pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 46(2):161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fink T, Schluter M, Heeger CH, Lemes C, Maurer T, Reissmann B et al (2018) Combination of left atrial appendage isolation and ligation to treat Nonresponders of pulmonary vein isolation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(12):1569–1579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Akoum N, Marchlinski F et al (2014) Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 311(5):498–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Narayan SM, Baykaner T, Clopton P, Schricker A, Lalani GG, Krummen DE et al (2014) Ablation of rotor and focal sources reduces late recurrence of atrial fibrillation compared with trigger ablation alone: extended follow-up of the CONFIRM trial (conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation). J Am Coll Cardiol 63(17):1761–1768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fink T, Schluter M, Heeger CH, Lemes C, Maurer T, Reissmann B et al (2017) Stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional substrate modification as index ablation procedures in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: the randomized Alster-lost-AF trial (ablation at st. Georg hospital for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 10(7)

  19. Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, Schreiber D, Luker J, Servatius H et al (2015) Pulmonary vein isolation versus Defragmentation: the CHASE-AF clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(24):2743–2752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takigawa M, Takahashi A, Kuwahara T, Okubo K, Takahashi Y, Watari Y et al (2014) Long-term follow-up after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the incidence of recurrence and progression of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7(2):267–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerr CR, Humphries KH, Talajic M, Klein GJ, Connolly SJ, Green M et al (2005) Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Canadian registry of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 149(3):489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, Prins MH, Tieleman RG, Coelen RJ et al (2010) Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(8):725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuck KH, Lebedev DS, Mikhaylov EN, Romanov A, Geller L, Kalejs O et al (2021) Catheter ablation or medical therapy to delay progression of atrial fibrillation: the randomized controlled atrial fibrillation progression trial (ATTEST). Europace 23(3):362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andrade JG, Deyell MW, Macle L, Wells GA, Bennett M, Essebag V et al (2023) Progression of atrial fibrillation after Cryoablation or drug therapy. N Engl J Med 388(2):105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Piccini JP, Baloch KN, Monahan KH et al (2019) Effect of catheter ablation vs medical therapy on quality of life among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(13):1275–1285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, Brandes A, Eckardt L, Elvan A et al (2020) Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 383(14):1305–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J et al (2021) Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 384(4):305–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S et al (2021) Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 384(4):316–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ekanem E, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Reichlin T, Neven K, Metzner A et al (2022) Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF). Europace 24(8):1256–1266

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE et al (2019) Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(13):1261–1274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L et al (2018) Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 378(5):417–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Verma A, Champagne J, Sapp J, Essebag V, Novak P, Skanes A et al (2013) Discerning the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation before and after catheter ablation (DISCERN AF): a prospective, multicenter study. JAMA Intern Med 173(2):149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuck KH, Furnkranz A, Chun KR, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Schluter M et al (2016) Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J 37(38):2858–2865

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen LY, Chung MK, Allen LA, Ezekowitz M, Furie KL, McCabe P et al (2018) Atrial fibrillation burden: moving beyond atrial fibrillation as a binary entity: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 137(20):e623–e644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brachmann J, Sohns C, Andresen D, Siebels J, Sehner S, Boersma L et al (2021) Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 7(5):594–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Metzner.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Rottner und A. Metzner geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rottner, L., Metzner, A. Langzeiterfolg nach Vorhofflimmerablation. Herzschr Elektrophys 34, 286–290 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00972-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00972-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation