Log in

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma in the elderly population: a propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 December 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

While robotic surgery is more costly and involves longer intra-operative time, it has a technical advantage over laparoscopic surgery. With our aging population, patients are being diagnosed with colon cancer at older ages. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients diagnosed with colon cancer at a national level.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database. Subjects ≥ 80-years-old who were diagnosed with stage I to III colon adenocarcinoma and underwent a robotic or laparoscopic colectomy from 2010–2018 were included. The laparoscopic group was propensity-score matched in a 3:1 ratio to the robotic group with 9343 laparoscopic and 3116 robotic cases matched. The main outcomes evaluated were 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rate, median survival, and length of stay.

Results

There was no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rate (OR = 1.1, CI = 0.94–1.29, p = 0.23) or 30-day mortality rate (OR = 1.05, CI = 0.86–1.28, p = 0.63) between both groups. Robotic surgery was associated with higher overall survival (42 vs 44.7 months, p < 0.001) using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Robotic surgery had a statistically significant shorter length of stay (6.4 vs. 5.9 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Robotic colectomies are associated with higher median survival rates and decrease in the length of hospital stay compared to laparoscopic colectomies in the elderly population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The primary database is available publicly through the American College of Surgeons (https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb). The data analyzed in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted Colorectal Surgery in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Trends and Outcomes. World J Surg 37(12):2782–2790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2024-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2876-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Srinath H, Kim TJ, Mor IJ, Warner RE (2022) Robot-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Octogenarians. J Am Med Dir Assoc 23(4):690–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palomba G, Dinuzzi VP, Capuano M et al (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience. J Robotic Surg 16:981–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tagliabue F, Burati M, Chiarelli M, Fumagalli L, Guttadauro A, Arborio E, De Simone M, Cioffi U (2020) Robotic vs laparoscopic right colectomy - the burden of age and comorbidity in perioperative outcomes: An observational study. World J Gastrointes Surg 12(6):287–297. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i6.287

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Oldani A, Bellora P, Monni M, Amato B, Gentilli S (2017) Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci **® System. Aging Clin Exp Res 29(Suppl 1):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0670-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceccarelli G, Andolfi E, Biancafarina A, Rocca A, Amato M, Milone M, Scricciolo M, Frezza B, Miranda E, De Prizio M, Fontani A (2017) Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review. Aging Clin Exp Res 29(Suppl 1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0676-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boffa D, Rosen J, Mallin K, Loomis A, Gay G, Palis B, Thoburn K, Gress D, McKellar DP, Shulman LN, Facktor M, Winchester D (2017) Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review. JAMA Oncol 3(12):1722–1728. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett DA (2001) How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health 25:464–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McCarthy E, Gough BL, Johns MS, Hanlon A, Vaid S, Petrelli N (2021) A Comparison of Colectomy Outcomes Utilizing Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Techniques. Am Surg 87(8):1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820973384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mirkin KA, Kulaylat AS, Hollenbeak CS, Messaris E (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(6):2894–2901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5999-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JS, Kang H, Park SY, Kim HJ, Woo IT, Park IK, Choi GS (2019) Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 33(9):2975–2981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6563-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu XL, Yan PJ, Yao L, Liu R, Wu DW, Du BB, Yang KH, Guo TK, Yang XF (2019) Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer. Surg Innovation 26(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618797822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benlice C, Aytac E, Costedio M, Kessler H, Abbas MA, Remzi FH, Gorgun E (2017) Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case‐matched comparison from the ACS‐NSQIP. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1783

  15. Hu DP, Zhu XL, Wang H, Liu WH, Lv YC, Shi XL, Feng LL, Zhang WS, Yang XF (2021) Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Short-term outcomes at a single center. Indian J Cancer 58(2):225–231. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_86_19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis B, Yoo AC, Moore M, Gunnarsson C (2014) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(2):211–224. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13753907291035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and Costs Associated With Robotic Colectomy in the Minimally Invasive Era. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):458–466. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827085ec

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Philip S, Jackson N, Mittal V (2018) Outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy and open colectomy when compared by operative duration for the procedure. Am J Surg 215(4):577–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Eduardo Serpa who contributed with the ideation of the concept in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data acquisition: Pacheco, Harris-Gendron. Statistical analysis: Pacheco, Zreik, Kamel. Drafting of Manuscript: Pacheco, Harris-Gendron, Luciano, Zreik. Critical revision of manuscript: Pacheco, Harris-Gendron, Luciano, Solh, Kamel.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felipe Pacheco.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was exempt from IRB approval and informed consent as the database is deidentified and available to the public.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the First name of the fifth author has been corrected to Mohamed.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pacheco, F., Harris-Gendron, S., Luciano, E. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma in the elderly population: a propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int J Colorectal Dis 38, 183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04481-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-023-04481-y

Keywords

Navigation