Log in

The impact of pathologic nodal status on survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, the accuracy rates of preneoadjuvant therapy nodal staging and potential nodal downstaging make the prognostic significance of nodal status unclear. We therefore sought to review our experience in order to better understand the impact of clinical and pathologic nodal status upon patient outcomes.

Methods

174 patients were identified as having undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation and resection for rectal cancer. For analytic purposes, patients were grouped into four nodal categories (uN 0· pN 0, uN 0· pN +, uN + · pN 0, and uN + · pN +). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

104 men and 70 women of median age 60 years (29–85 years) were followed for a median of 31 months (1–121 months). Nodal staging was available for 129 patients, with a median of 8 lymph nodes (range 0–39) evaluated. Disease recurred in 3 of 41 (7 %) uN   0·pN   0, 10 of 52 (20 %) uN    +·pN   0, 7 of 18 (41 %) uN   0·pN    +, and 6 of 17 (35 %) uN   +·pN   + patients. Those patients having nodal downstaging (uN   +·pN   0) experienced superior overall survival (p = 0.03). Only pathologic nodal status was a significant predictor of both disease-free and overall survival in multivariate modeling. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact disease-free or overall survival for patients with pN0.

Conclusions

Pathologic nodal status may represent a superior predictor of survival for patients with local advanced rectal cancers. Our findings may have potential implications for the application of adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, Redmond C, Deutsch M et al (1988) Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst 80:21–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. (1985) Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. N Engl J Med 312: 1465–1472.

  3. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson AB 3rd, Bekaii-Saab T, Chan E, Chen YJ, Choti MA et al (2012) Rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10:1528–1564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landmann RG, Wong WD, Hoepfl J, Shia J, Guillem JG et al (2007) Limitations of early rectal cancer nodal staging may explain failure after local excision. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1520–1525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:9–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JC, Kim HC, Yu CS, Han KR, Kim JR et al (2006) Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging. Am J Surg 192:89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Das P, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Feig BW, Chang GJ et al (2007) Predictors of tumor response and downstaging in patients who receive preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Cancer 109:1750–1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim JG, Cho HM, Shim BY (2011) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: predictors of the tumor response and the long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys 81:431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moureau-Zabotto L, Farnault B, de Chaisemartin C, Esterni B, Lelong B et al (2011) Predictive factors of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys 80:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Casado E, Garcia VM, Sanchez JJ, Blanco M, Maurel J et al (2011) A combined strategy of SAGE and quantitative PCR provides a 13-gene signature that predicts preoperative chemoradiotherapy response and outcome in rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:4145–4154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horisberger K, Erben P, Muessle B, Woernle C, Stroebel P et al (2009) Topoisomerase I expression correlates to response to neoadjuvant irinotecan-based chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 20:519–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi H, Hashiguchi Y, Ueno H, Shinto E, Kajiwara Y et al (2007) Absence of cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression is a predictor of tumor regression in rectal cancer treated with preoperative short-term chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1354–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudrimoti M, Lee EY, Kang Y, Ahmed M, Mohiuddin M (2007) Genetic markers predictive of response to induction chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. J Ky Med Assoc 105:18–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuremsky JG, Tepper JE, McLeod HL (2009) Biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol, Biol, Phys 74:673–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin LC, Lee HH, Hwang WS, Li CF, Huang CT et al (2006) p53 and p27 as predictors of clinical outcome for rectal-cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Surg Oncol 15:211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pucciarelli S, Rampazzo E, Briarava M, Maretto I, Agostini M et al (2012) Telomere-specific reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and cell-free RNA in plasma as predictors of pathologic tumor response in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3089–3096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saigusa S, Toiyama Y, Tanaka K, Okugawa Y, Fujikawa H et al (2012) Prognostic significance of glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) gene expression in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Surg Today 42:460–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Mescoli C, Belluco E et al (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Maretto I, Zandona M, Del Bianco P et al (2011) Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Surgery 149:56–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdul-Jalil KI, Sheehan KM, Kehoe J, Cummins R, O'Grady A, et al. (2013) The prognostic value of tumour regression grade following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis

  22. Arredondo J, Baixauli J, Beorlegui C, Arbea L, Rodriguez J et al (2013) Prognosis factors for recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer preoperatively treated with chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 56:416–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elezkurtaj S, Moser L, Budczies J, Muller AJ, Blaker H et al (2013) Histopathological regression grading matches excellently with local and regional spread after neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer. Pathol Res Pract 209:424–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhadda AS, Bessell EM, Scholefield J, Dickinson P, Zaitoun AM (2014) Mandard tumour regression grade, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin and post-chemoradiation nodal status strongly predict outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 26:197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Damin DC, Rosito MA, Contu PC, Tarta C, Ferreira PR et al (2012) Lymph node retrieval after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1573–1580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai CJ, Crane CH, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Chang GJ et al (2011) Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis among pathologically lymph node-negative patients after preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer 117:3713–3722

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L, de Sousa JB, Buta M, Lavery IC et al (2013) Less than 12 nodes in the surgical specimen after total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: it means more than you think! Ann Surg Oncol 20:3398–3406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sprenger T, Rothe H, Becker H, Beissbarth T, Homayounfar K et al (2013) Lymph node metastases in rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy: impact of intramesorectal distribution and residual micrometastatic involvement. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1283–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P et al (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1114–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Moffitt TJF Colorectal Cancer Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Shibata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez, J.M., Clark, W., Weber, J. et al. The impact of pathologic nodal status on survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 1061–1068 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1917-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1917-8

Keywords

Navigation