Log in

Complication rates in very low and extremely low birth weight infants following laparotomy: a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical site occurrences (SSO), including surgical site infection, dehiscence, and incisional hernia, are complications following laparotomy. SSO rates in premature neonates are poorly understood. We hypothesize that SSO rates are higher among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants compared to very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and strive to determine the optimal abdominal closure method for these infants.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of infants < 1.5 kg (kg) undergoing laparotomy at two institutions from 1/1/2020 to 5/1/2022. Patients were grouped by weight and closure; SSO rates were computed and the association tested using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

We identified 59 patients and 104 total operations. At initial surgery, 37 patients weighed < 1 kg (ELBW); 22 patients weighed 1–1.5 kg (VLBW). Complication rate for ELBW was 6(16%) vs. 2(9%) in VLBW, but not significant (p = 0.45). More complications followed a single-layer compared to a two-layer closure (18 vs. 2), but not significant (p = 0.30).

Conclusions

SSO rates are higher for ELBW infants undergoing laparotomy, and fewer complications follow two-layer closure. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to reduce postoperative complications in these infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data for this study is available upon request.

Abbreviations

ELBW:

Extremely low birthweight

kg:

Kilogram

SSO:

Surgical site occurrence

VLBW:

Very low birthweight

References

  1. Surgical site infection event (SSI). Natl Healthc Saf Netw Surg Site Infect Event 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf (Accessed 8 Aug 2022).

  2. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, Harbrecht BG, Jensen EH, Fry DE et al (2017) American college of surgeons and surgical infection society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. J Am Coll Surg 224:59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, Franz C, Song P, Yamin CK et al (2013) Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med 173:2039–2046. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR (2017) Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Willy C, Engelhardt M, Stichling M, Grauhan O (2016) The impact of surgical site occurrences and the role of closed incision negative pressure therapy. Int Wound J 13:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12659

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Catania VD, Boscarelli A, Lauriti G, Morini F, Zani A (2019) Risk factors for surgical site infection in neonates: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartz-Kurycki MA, Green C, Anderson KT, Alder AC, Bucher BT, Cina RA et al (2018) Enhanced neonatal surgical site infection prediction model utilizing statistically and clinically significant variables in combination with a machine learning algorithm. Am J Surg 216:764–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clements KE, Fisher M, Quaye K, O’Donnell R, Whyte C, Horgan MJ (2016) Surgical site infections in the NICU. J Pediatr Surg 51:1405–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woldemicael AY, Bradley S, Pardy C, Richards J, Trerotoli P, Giuliani S (2019) Surgical site infection in a tertiary neonatal surgery centre. Eur J Pediatr Surg Off J Austrian Assoc Pediatr Surg Al Z Kinderchir 29:260–265. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Segal I, Kang C, Albersheim SG, Skarsgard ED, Lavoie PM (2014) Surgical site infections in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr Surg 49:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD, Musters GD, Coultre SEL, de Jonge WJ, van Heurn LE, Derikx JPM (2021) Incisional hernia after abdominal surgery in infants: a retrospective analysis of incidence and risk factors. J Pediatr Surg 56:2107–2112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.01.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad PA, Wong-McLoughlin J, Patel S, Coffin SE, Zaoutis TE, Perlman J et al (2016) Surgical site infections in a longitudinal cohort of neonatal intensive care unit patients. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc 36:300–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirk RM (1972) Effect of method of opening and closing the abdomen on incidence of wound bursting. Lancet 300:352–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(72)91736-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goligher JC, Irvin TT, Johnston D, De Dombal FT, Hill GL, Horrocks JC (1975) A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds. Br J Surg 62:823–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800621019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henriksen NA, Deerenberg EB, Venclauskas L, Fortelny RH, Miserez M, Muysoms FE (2018) Meta-analysis on materials and techniques for laparotomy closure: the MATCH review. World J Surg 42:1666–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4393-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo W, Tao Y, Wang Y, Ouyang Z, Huang J, Long X (2022) Comparing running vs interrupted sutures for skin closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13863

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chana RS, Saxena VC, Agarwal A (1993) A prospective study of closure techniques of abdominal incisions in infants and children. J Indian Med Assoc 91:59–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Inoue M, Uchida K, Nagano Y, Matsushita K, Koike Y, Otake K et al (2018) Impact of relationship between the stoma site and the primary incision on occurrence of laparotomy wound infection in contaminated or dirty wound operations in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 34:957–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4310-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kronfli R, Maguire K, Walker GM (2013) Neonatal stomas: does a separate incision avoid complications and a full laparotomy at closure? Pediatr Surg Int 29:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3234-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blakely ML, Tyson JE, Lally KP, Hintz SR, Eggleston B, Stevenson DK et al (2021) Initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage in extremely low birthweight infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 274:e370–e380. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from the funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LL wrote the initial draft of the main manuscript text and created the database used for data management. NH performed the statistical analysis and prepared the tables. TN and CM collected data for the study and provided major edits to the main manuscript. KL developed the research question and supervised the research design, methodology, and provided major edits to the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda T. Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L.T., Hebballi, N.B., Nguyen, T. et al. Complication rates in very low and extremely low birth weight infants following laparotomy: a prospective study. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05520-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05520-z

Keywords

Navigation