Log in

Readability of patient and family education materials on pediatric surgical association websites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Globally, pediatric surgical association websites present patient/family education materials on an extensive list of conditions, including descriptions of the condition, signs and symptoms, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options. The purpose of this project was to assess the readability of pediatric surgical association websites’ patient/family education materials.

Methods

With IRB approval, we accessed all patient/family education materials on pediatric surgical association websites from around the globe and used multiple grade-level assessments and readability assessments to determine the reading level at which the information is presented.

Results

The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) website and the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons (BAPS) present publicly accessible patient/family education materials. Seventy-four (74) conditions on APSA’s website were analyzed. Three grade-level assessments and the Flesch Reading Ease assessment indicated that the articles are written at high school reading levels. No articles were available in languages other than English. BAPS presented 6 conditions, most of which were more readable than their APSA counterparts.

Conclusions

Our analysis indicates that the patient/family education materials available on pediatric surgical association websites may not be written at a level that is comprehensible by the general population. Potential solutions include re-writing the materials with an emphasis on readability and presenting materials in languages other than English.

Level of evidence

V.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eysenbach G, Kohler C (2003) What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. In: AMIA annual symposium Proceedings, pp 225–229

  2. Sepucha KR, Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Freiberg A, Malchau H, Mangla M et al (2018) Informed, patient-centered decisions associated with better health outcomes in orthopedics: prospective cohort study. Med Decis Mak 38(8):1018–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR (1998) Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med 158(2):166–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Safeer RS, Keenan J (2005) Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician 72(3):463–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 32(3):221–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freimuth VS (1979) Assessing the readability of health education messages. Public Health Rep 94(6):568–570

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leichter SB, Nieman JA, Moore RW, Collins P, Rhodes A (1981) Readability of self-care instructional pamphlets for diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 4(6):627–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Shah R, Schmitt PJ, Baredes S, Setzen M et al (2014) Analysis of the readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Laryngoscope 124(2):405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kue J, Klemanski DL, Browning KK (2021) Evaluating readability scores of treatment summaries and cancer survivorship care plans. JCO Oncol Pract 17(10):615–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Okuhara T, Ishikawa H, Ueno H, Okada H, Kato M, Kiuchi T (2022) Readability assessment of vaccine information: a systematic review for addressing vaccine hesitancy. Patient Educ Couns 105(2):331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler GA, Heater B (1983) Guidelines for clinical evaluation. J Nurs Educ 22(9):402–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: AG. Acquisition of data: LW. Analysis and interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting and revision of manuscript: all authors. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankush Gosain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willis, L., Gosain, A. Readability of patient and family education materials on pediatric surgical association websites. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 156 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05446-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05446-6

Keywords

Navigation