Log in

Distinct sources of dynamical predictability for two types of Atlantic Niño

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atlantic Niño, lasting approximately 3 months, manifests as pronounced sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the eastern equatorial Atlantic on the interannual time scale. There are two primary types of Atlantic Niño events: one peaking in boreal summer and the other in boreal winter. Sources of dynamical predictability for the two types of Atlantic Niño remain elusive. Through the analysis of seasonal forecasts and hindcasts from various climate models, the present study uncovers distinct sources of dynamical predictability for the boreal summer and winter Atlantic Niño. The prediction skill of the boreal summer Atlantic Niño is closely associated with SST anomalies in the Angola coast, especially those tied to the Benguela Niño. In contrast, the prediction skill of the boreal winter type is significantly influenced by the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Due to the superior predictability of the IOD and ENSO in boreal autumn, there is an enhanced prediction skill for the boreal winter Atlantic Niño. Conversely, climate models often struggle to predict the Benguela Niño, leading to a diminished prediction accuracy for the boreal summer Atlantic Niño. Further analysis reveals that the strength of the simulated Atlantic–Benguela Niño connection is sensitive to the Benguela Niño-related surface wind anomalies over the equatorial western–central Atlantic and Angola coast. These results imply that the prediction skill of the Atlantic Niño, especially for the boreal summer type, might be further improved through better capturing the Atlantic–Benguela Niño connection in the models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The HadISST dataset is available at https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadisst/data/download.html. The GODAS dataset is available at https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/godas-ncep-global-ocean-data-assimilation-system. The ERA5 reanalysis dataset and the EUROSIP seasonal forecasts and hindcasts are available at https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/. The NMME model datasets can be obtained from http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/SOURCES/.Models/.NMME/, and the CMME model datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which helped us improve the quality of this paper.

Funding

This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (41975102, 42375064, U2142211), the Joint Research Project for Meteorological Capacity Improvement (22NLTSZ002), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1506003), and the China Meteorological Administration Key Innovation Team for Climate Prediction (CMA2023ZD03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **qing Zuo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1022 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, A., Zuo, J., Chen, L. et al. Distinct sources of dynamical predictability for two types of Atlantic Niño. Clim Dyn (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07169-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-024-07169-3

Keywords

Navigation