Log in

Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as a treatment option for drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES–ISR), the most effective treatment strategy for DES–ISR is still under debate. Therefore, we compared long-term clinical outcomes following DCB treatment of DES–ISR with those following 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment. We identified 248 DES–ISR lesions in 238 patients that were treated with either 2nd-generation DES implantation (n = 56) or DCB angioplasty (n = 192). We compared the incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in the two groups during the 2-year period following treatment. MACE was defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization. The percentage of patients with diabetes and the mean age of patients in the DCB group were greater than in the DES group. The DCB group also had a smaller reference vessel diameter. The DES group had a larger post-intervention minimal luminal diameter. We found no significant difference in the MACE rate between the two groups during the 2 years following treatment (11.0 % in the DCB group vs. 8.9 % in the DES group, p = 0.660). Reference segment diameter was the only independent predictive factor for MACE in the post-treatment period (hazard ratio 0.35, 95 % confidence interval: 0.15–0.82, p = 0.016). Clinical efficacy of DCB angioplasty for treatment of DES–ISR was comparable to that of 2nd-generation DES implantation as measured by the rate of MACEs in the two groups. Reference segment diameter was the only statistically significant independent predictor for MACE in the 2-year period following treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cassese S, Byrne RA, Tada T, Pinieck S, Joner M, Ibrahim T, King LA, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Kastrati A (2014) Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10,004 patients with surveillance angiography. Heart 100:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R (2010) In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1897–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfonso F, Byrne RA, Rivero F, Kastrati A (2014) Current treatment of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:2659–2673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YH, Lee BK, Park DW, Park KH, Choi BR, Lee CW, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ (2006) Comparison with conventional therapies of repeated sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:1451–1454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Torguson R, Sabate M, Deible R, Smith K, Chu WW, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Suddath WO, Satler LF, Waksman R (2006) Intravascular brachytherapy versus drug-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:1340–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U (2006) Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 355:2113–2124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Unverdorben M, Vallbracht C, Cremers B, Heuer H, Hengstenberg C, Maikowski C, Werner GS, Antoni D, Kleber FX, Bocksch W, Leschke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Speck U, Degenhardt R, Scheller B (2009) Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Circulation 119:2986–2994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scheller B, Clever YP, Kelsch B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Speck U, Bohm M, Cremers B (2012) Long-term follow-up after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:323–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne RA, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J, Pinieck S, Wolff B, Tiroch K, Schulz S, Fusaro M, Ott I, Ibrahim T, Hausleiter J, Valina C, Pache J, Laugwitz KL, Massberg S, Kastrati A (2013) Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 381:461–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu B, Gao R, Wang J, Yang Y, Chen S, Liu B, Chen F, Li Z, Han Y, Fu G, Zhao Y, Ge J (2014) A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of paclitaxel-coated balloon versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis: results from the PEPCAD China ISR trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A (2014) 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35:2541–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100:1872–1878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115:2344–2351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BR, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand J-P, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon J-L, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1581–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wohrle J, Zadura M, Mobius-Winkler S, Leschke M, Opitz C, Ahmed W, Barragan P, Simon JP, Cassel G, Scheller B (2012) SeQuentPlease World Wide Registry: clinical results of SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in a large-scale, prospective registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1733–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whan Lee C, Kim SH, Suh J, Park DW, Lee SH, Kim YH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ (2008) Long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of restenosis within bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:594–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg DH, Gaglia MA Jr, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy P, Bonello L, De Labriolle A, Lemesle G, Torguson R, Kineshige K, Xue Z, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Lindsay J, Waksman R (2009) Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 103:491–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R (2011) The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1314–1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, Kolodgie FD, Ladich E, Kutys R, Skorija K, Gold HK, Virmani R (2006) Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:193–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taguchi I, Yoneda S, Abe S, Toyoda S, Nasuno T, Nishino S, Kageyama M, Tokura M, Ogawa M, Node K, Inoue T (2014) The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart Vessels 29:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikuta S, Kobuke K, Iwanaga Y, Nakauchi Y, Yamaji K, Miyazaki S (2014) Difference in neointimal coverage at chronic stage between bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent evaluated at stent-strut level by optical coherence tomography. Heart Vessels 29:320–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Tiroch K, Pinieck S, Schulz S, Kufner S, Massberg S, Laugwitz KL, Schomig A, Kastrati A (2010) Randomized trial of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents: the ISAR-DESIRE 2 (intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: drug eluting stents for in-stent restenosis 2) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2710–2716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kastrati A, Byrne R (2011) New roads, new ruts: lessons from drug-eluting stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:165–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Dutary J, Zueco J, Cequier A, Garcia-Touchard A, Marti V, Lozano I, Angel J, Hernandez JM, Lopez-Minguez JR, Melgares R, Moreno R, Seidelberger B, Fernandez C, Hernandez R (2012) Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [Restenosis Intra-Stent: balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent]). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:728–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alfonso F, Garcia J, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernando L, Hernandez R, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Macaya C (2009) New stent implantation for recurrences after stenting for in-stent restenosis: implications of a third metal layer in human coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1036–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waksman R, Pakala R (2009) Drug-eluting balloon: the comeback kid? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:352–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Almalla M, Schroder J, Pross V, Marx N, Hoffmann R (2014) Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83:881–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, García del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Minguéz JR, Benedicto A, Masotti M, Zueco J, Iñiguez A, Velázquez M, Moreno R, Mainar V, Domínguez A, Pomar F, Melgares R, Rivero F, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernández C, Macaya C (2015) A prospective randomized trial of drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: the RIBS IV randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:23–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Habara S, Mitsudo K, Goto T, Kadota K, Fujii S, Yamamoto H, Kato H, Takenaka S, Fuku Y, Hosogi S, Hirono A, Yamamoto K, Tanaka H, Hasegawa D, Nakamura Y, Tasaka H, Otsuru S, Okamoto Y, Yamada C, Miyamoto M, Inoue K (2008) The impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Heart 94:1162–1165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology Research and Development Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (Nos. A085136 and A102064), the Mid-career Researcher Program through NRF grant funded by the MEST, Republic of Korea (No. 2015R1A2A2A01002731) and the Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myeong-Ki Hong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

I. S. Kang and I. Shehata contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, I.S., Shehata, I., Shin, DH. et al. Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart Vessels 31, 1405–1411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6

Keywords

Navigation