Abstract
The dynamical prediction of the Asian-Australian monsoon (AAM) has been an important and long-standing issue in climate science. In this study, the predictability of the first two leading modes of the AAM is studied using retrospective prediction datasets from the seasonal forecasting models in four operational centers worldwide. Results show that the model predictability of the leading AAM modes is sensitive to how they are defined in different seasonal sequences, especially for the second mode. The first AAM mode, from various seasonal sequences, coincides with the El Niño phase transition in the eastern-central Pacific. The second mode, initialized from boreal summer and autumn, leads El Niño by about one year but can exist during the decay phase of El Niño when initialized from boreal winter and spring. Our findings hint that ENSO, as an early signal, is conducive to better performance of model predictions in capturing the spatiotemporal variations of the leading AAM modes. Still, the persistence barrier of ENSO in spring leads to poor forecasting skills of spatial features. The multimodel ensemble (MME) mean shows some advantage in capturing the spatiotemporal variations of the AAM modes but does not provide a significant improvement in predicting its temporal features compared to the best individual models in predicting its temporal features. The BCC_CSM1.1M shows promising skill in predicting the two AAM indices associated with two leading AAM modes. The predictability demonstrated in this study is potentially useful for AAM prediction in operational and climate services.
摘要
亚澳季风(AAM)的动力预测一直是气候学研究中的重要课题. 本研究基于四个国际业务预报中心开发的季节预报模式回算数据, 对AAM年际变率前两个主模态的可预报性进行了系统性地分析. 结果表明, 模式对AAM主模态的可预测性与定义它们的季节顺序有关, 尤其是对于第二模态. 无论是从何季节开始, AAM第一模态都与厄尔尼诺在中-东太**洋的位相转变一致. 而AAM第二模态与厄尔尼诺的关系有差异: 从夏季与秋季起始的AAM第二模态超前于厄尔尼诺一年; 从春季与冬季起始的AAM第二模态则存在于厄尔尼诺衰退阶段. 研究结果进一步表明, 厄尔尼诺和南方涛动(ENSO)作为早期信号, 有助于动力模式更好地捕捉AAM主模态的时空变化特征. 然而, ENSO的春季持续障碍会影响动力模式对其空间特征的预测能力. 多模式集合在预测AAM主模态的时空变化特征方面具有一定的优势, 但与最好单模式相比, 在预测AAM主模态时间变化方面它并没有提供显著改进. 另外, BCC_CSM1.1M模式在预测AAM主模态指数时有较高的预报技巧. 整体上, 本研究的分析结果对于AAM的业务预测和气候服务具有着重要意义.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present). Journal of Hydrometeorology, 4, 1147–1167, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2.
Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2018: The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly analysis (new version 2.3) and a review of 2017 global precipitation. Atmosphere, 9(4), 138, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138.
Chevuturi, A., N. P. Klingaman, A. G. Turner, and S. Hannah, 2018: Projected changes in the Asian-Australian monsoon region in 1.5°C and 2.0°C global-warming scenarios. Earth’s Future, 6, 339–358, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000734.
Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.
Dunstone, N., and Coauthors, 2020: Skilful interannual climate prediction from two large initialised model ensembles. Environmental Research Letters, 15, 094083, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9f7d.
**, L., H. Zhang, A. Moise, G. Martin, S. Milton, and J. Rodriguez, 2019: Australia-Asian monsoon in two versions of the UK Met Office Unified Model and their impacts on tropical-extratropical teleconnections. Climate Dyn., 53, 4717–4741, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04821-1.
Krishnamurti, T. N., C. M. Kishtawal, T. E. Larow, D. R. Bachiochi, Z. Zhang, C. E. Williford, S. Gadgil, and S. Surendran, 1999: Improved weather and seasonal climate forecasts from multimodel superensemble. Science, 285, 1548–1550, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5433.1548.
Kumar, K. K., M. Hoerling, and B. Rajagopalan, 2005: Advancing dynamical prediction of Indian monsoon rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(8), L08704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021979.
Li, J., Y. M. Yang, and B. Wang, 2018: Evaluation of NESMv3 and CMIP5 Models’ performance on simulation of Asian-Australian monsoon. Atmosphere, 9(9), 327, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9090327.
Ma, L. B., and Z. J. Jiang, 2020: Improved leading modes of interannual variability of the Asian-Australian monsoon in an AGCM via incorporating a stochastic multicloud model. Climate Dyn., 54, 759–775, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05025-3.
Ma, L. B., Z. J. Jiang, and J. Cao, 2020: Effects of a stochastic multicloud parameterization on the simulated Asian-Australian monsoon rainfall in an AGCM. International Journal of Climatology, 40(5), 2580–2598, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6352.
Molteni, F., and Coauthors, 2011: The New ECMWF Seasonal Forecast System (System 4). ECMWF Technical Memoranda, https://doi.org/10.21957/4nery093i. https://doi.org/10.21957/4nery093i.
Mooley, D. A., and B. Parthasarathy, 1983: Indian summer monsoon and El Niño. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 121(2), 339–352, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590143.
Normand, C., 1953: Monsoon seasonal forecasting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 79, 463–473, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707934202.
Palmer, T. N., C. Branković, and D. S. Richardson, 2000: A probability and decision-model analysis of PROVOST seasonal multi-model ensemble integrations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 2013–2033, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656703.
Ren, H.-L., F.-F. **, B. Tian, and A. A. Scaife, 2016: Distinct persistence barriers in two types of ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10973–10979, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071015. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071015.
Ren, H.-L., F. Zheng, J. J. Luo, R. Wang, M. H. Liu, W. J. Zhang, T. J. Zhou, and G. Q. Zhou, 2020: A review of research on tropical air-sea interaction, ENSO dynamics, and ENSO prediction in China. J. Meteor. Res., 34, 43–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9155-1.
Ren, H.-L., and Coauthors, 2017: Prediction of primary climate variability modes at the Bei**g Climate Center. J. Meteor. Res., 31(1), 204–223, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6097-3.
Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2014: The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J. Climate, 27, 2185–2208, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1.
Stevens, B., and Coauthors, 2013: Atmospheric component of the MPI-M earth system model: ECHAM6. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 5, 146–172, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20015.
Takaya, Y., and Coauthors, 2018: Japan Meteorological Agency/Meteorological Research Institute-Coupled Prediction System version 2 (JMA/MRI-CPS2): atmosphere-land-ocean-sea ice coupled prediction system for operational seasonal forecasting. Climate Dyn., 50, 751–765, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3638-5.
Tian, B., H.-L. Ren, F.-F. **, and M. F. Stuecker, 2019: Diagnosing the representation and causes of the ENSO persistence barrier in CMIP5 simulations. Climate Dyn., 53, 2147–2160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04810-4.
Wang, B., and S.-I. An, 2005: A method for detecting season-dependent modes of climate variability: S-EOF analysis. Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, L15710, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022709.
Wang, B., R. G. Wu, and K. M. Lau, 2001: Interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon: Contrasts between the Indian and the western North Pacific-east Asian monsoons. J. Climate, 14, 4073–4090, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<4073:IVOTAS>2.0.CO;2.
Wang, B., R. G. Wu, and T. Li, 2003: Atmosphere-Warm Ocean interaction and its impacts on Asian-Australian monsoon variation. J. Climate, 16, 1195–1211, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)16<1195:AOIAII>2.0.CO;2.
Wang, B., I.-S. Kang, and J.-Y. Lee, 2004: Ensemble simulations of Asian-Australian monsoon variability by 11 AGCMS. J. Climate, 17, 803–818, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0803:ESOAMV>2.0.CO;2.
Wang, B., J. Yang, T. J. Zhou, and B. Wang, 2008b: Interdecadal changes in the major modes of Asian-Australian monsoon variability: Strengthening relationship with ENSO since the late 1970s. J. Climate, 21, 1771–1789, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1981.1.
Wang, B., S. Y. Yim, J. Y. Lee, J. Liu, and K. J. Ha, 2014: Future change of Asian-Australian monsoon under RCP 4.5 anthropogenic warming scenario. Climate Dyn., 42(1), 83–100, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1769-x.
Wang, B., and Coauthors, 2008a: How accurately do coupled climate models predict the leading modes of Asian-Australian monsoon interannual variability? Climate Dyn., 30(6), 605–619, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0310-5.
Wang, H. J., and Coauthors, 2015: A review of seasonal climate prediction research in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 149–168, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-014-0016-7.
Webster, P. J., V. O. Magaña, T. N. Palmer, J. Shukla, R. A. Tomas, M. Yanai, and T. Yasunari, 1998: Monsoons: Processes, predictability, and the prospects for prediction. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 103, 14451–14510, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02719. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02719.
Weisheimer, and Coauthors., 2009: ENSEMBLES: A new multimodel ensemble for seasonal-to-annual predictions—Skill and progress beyond DEMETER in forecasting tropical Pacific SSTs. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L21711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040896.
Wu, B., T. J. Zhou, and T. M. Li, 2009: Contrast of Rainfall-SST relationships in the Western North Pacific between the ENSO-Develo** and ENSO-Decaying summers. J. Climate, 22, 4398–4405, https://doi.org/10.1175/0099JLLI2648.1.
Wu, R. G., and B. P. Kirtman, 2005: Roles of Indian and Pacific Ocean air-sea coupling in tropical atmospheric variability. Climate Dyn., 25, 155–170, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0003-x.
Wu, T. W., and Coauthors, 2014: An overview of BCC climate system model development and application for climate change studies. J. Meteor. Res., 28, 34–56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-3041-7.
Wu, Z. W., and J. P. Li, 2008: Prediction of the Asian-Australian monsoon interannual variations with the Grid-point Atmospheric Model of IAP LASG (GAMIL). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 25, 387–394, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-008-0387-8.
Zhang, R. H., A. Sumi, and M. Kimoto, 1996: Impact of El Niño on the East Asian monsoon: A diagnostic study of the ‘86/87’ and ‘91/92’ events. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 74, 49–62, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.74.1_49.
Zhou, F., H.-L. Ren, M.-H. Liu, R. Wang, and K. Huang, 2021: Leading modes of Asian-Australian monsoon interannual variability as represented in CMIP5 models. International Journal of Climatology, 41(2), 896–916, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6702.
Zhou, T. J., B. Wu, and B. Wang, 2009: How well do atmospheric general circulation models capture the leading modes of the interannual variability of the Asian-Australian monsoon? J. Climate, 22, 1159–1173, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2245.1.
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U2242206, 41975094 and 41905062), the National Key Research and Development Program on monitoring, Early Warning and Prevention of Major Natural Disaster (Grant Nos. 2017YFC1502302 and 2018YFC1506005), the Basic Research and Operational Special Project of CAMS (Grant No. 2021Z007), and the Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The model predictability of the leading AAM modes is sensitive to their definitions of different seasonal sequences, especially for the second mode.
• ENSO, as an early signal, is conducive to a better performance of model predictions in capturing spatiotemporal variations of the leading AAM modes.
• The analysis and evaluation results reported in this work provide valuable guidance for operational prediction.
This paper is a contribution to the 2nd Special Issue on Climate Science for Service Partnership China
Electronic Supplementary Material to
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, L., Ren, HL., Zhou, F. et al. Dynamical Predictability of Leading Interannual Variability Modes of the Asian-Australian Monsoon in Climate Models. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1998–2012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-2288-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-023-2288-2
Key words
- Asian-Australian monsoon (AAM)
- leading interannual variability modes
- El Niño
- seasonal forecasting models
- multimodel ensemble (MME)