Abstract
In order to compare the impacts of the choice of land surface model (LSM) parameterization schemes, meteorological forcing, and land surface parameters on land surface hydrological simulations, and explore to what extent the quality can be improved, a series of experiments with different LSMs, forcing datasets, and parameter datasets concerning soil texture and land cover were conducted. Six simulations are run for the Chinese mainland on 0.1° × 0.1° grids from 1979 to 2008, and the simulated monthly soil moisture (SM), evapotranspiration (ET), and snow depth (SD) are then compared and assessed against observations. The results show that the meteorological forcing is the most important factor governing output. Beyond that, SM seems to be also very sensitive to soil texture information; SD is also very sensitive to snow parameterization scheme in the LSM. The Community Land Model version 4.5 (CLM4.5), driven by newly developed observation-based regional meteorological forcing and land surface parameters (referred to as CMFD_CLM4.5_NEW), significantly improved the simulations in most cases over the Chinese mainland and its eight basins. It increased the correlation coefficient values from 0.46 to 0.54 for the SM modeling and from 0.54 to 0.67 for the SD simulations, and it decreased the root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 0.093 to 0.085 for the SM simulation and reduced the normalized RMSE from 1.277 to 0.201 for the SD simulations. This study indicates that the offline LSM simulation using a refined LSM driven by newly developed observation-based regional meteorological forcing and land surface parameters can better model reginal land surface hydrological processes.
摘要
本文利用不同模式参数化方案、气象**迫和地表参数设计了六个模拟试验,并与观测进行对比分析,揭示了影响**区域陆面水文要素(土壤湿度、蒸散发和雪深等)模拟的主要因子。结果表明,气象**迫是陆面水文过程模拟的主要影响因子,土壤湿度和雪深的模拟分别与土壤质地信息和陆面模式参数化方案紧密相关。利用新发展的融合观测信息的**区域气象**迫和地表参数信息驱动陆面模式模拟,显著提高了**大部分区域陆面水文过程模拟精度,并减少了模拟的不确定性。土壤湿度模拟与观测的相关系数从0.46提高到0.54,雪深模拟与观测的相关系数从0.54提高到0.67;土壤湿度模拟与观测的均方根误差从0.093降低到0.085,雪深模拟与观测的均方根误差从1.277降低到0.201。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albergel, C., P. de Rosnay, G. Balsamo, L. Isaksen, and J. Muñoz-Sabater, 2012: Soil moisture analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation using global ground-based in situ observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 1442–1460, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0107.1.
Bonan, G. B., S. Levis, L. Kergoat, and K. W. Oleson, 2002: Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 5–1–5–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001360.
Chen, J., B. Z. Chen, T. A. Black, J. L. Innes, G. Y. Wang, G. Kiely, T. Hirano, and G. Wohlfahrt, 2013: Comparison of terrestrial evapotranspiration estimates using the mass transfer and Penman-Monteith equations in land surface models. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 118, 1715–1731, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002446.
Dirmeyer, P. A., X. Gao, M. Zhao, Z. C. Guo, T. Oki, and N. Hanasaki, 2006: GSWP-2: Multimodel analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 1381–1398, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-10-1381.
Friedl, M. A., and Coauthors, 2002: Global land cover map** from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 287–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00078-0.
Gao, H., and G. S. Jia, 2013: Assessing disagreement and tolerance of misclassification of satellite-derived land cover products used in WRF model applications. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30(1), 125–141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-2037-4.
He, J., K. Yang, W. J. Tang, H. Lu, J. Qin, Y. Y. Chen, and X. Li, 2020: The first high-resolution meteorological forcing dataset for land process studies over China. Scientific Data, 7, 25, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0369-y.
Hoffman, F. M., and Coauthors, 2017: 2016 international land model benchmarking (ILAMB) workshop report. Technical Report DOE/SC-0186, 159 pp, https://doi.org/10.2172/1330803.
Hou, X. Y., 2001: Vegetation Atlas of China (1:1,000,000). Sciences Press, 260 pp. Bei**g. (in Chinese)
Jia, B. H., J. G. Liu, and Z. H. **e, 2015: Evaluation of a multi-satellite soil moisture product and the Community Land Model 4.5 simulation in China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 12, 5151–5186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-12-5151-2015.
Jia, B. H., J. G. Liu, Z. H. **e, and C. X. Shi, 2018: Interannual variations and trends in remotely sensed and modeled soil moisture in China. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 19(5), 831–847, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0003.1.
Jung, M., and Coauthors, 2010: Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467, 951–954, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09396.
Jung, M., and Coauthors, 2011: Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 116, G00J07, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001566.
Kato, H., and Coauthors, 2006: Sensitivity of Land Surface Simulations to Model Physics, Parameters, and Forcings, at Four CEOP Sites. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85A, 187–204, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85A.187.
Lawrence, D. M., and Coauthors, 2011: Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 3, M03001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS00045.
Lawrence, P. J., and T. N. Chase, 2007: Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0). J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 112, G01023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000168.
Li, W. K., W. D. Guo, B. Qiu, Y. K. Xue, P. C. Hsu, and J. F. Wei, 2018a: Influence of Tibetan Plateau snow cover on East Asian atmospheric circulation at medium-range time scales. Nature Communications, 9, 4243, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06762-5.
Li, J. D., F. Chen, G. Zhang, M. Barlage, Y. J. Gan, Y. F. **n, and C. Wang, 2018b: Impacts of land cover and soil texture uncertainty on land model simulations over the central Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10, 2121–2146, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001377.
Liang, X., and Y. J. Dai, 2008: A sensitivity study of the Common Land Model on soil texture and soil brightness. Climatic and Environmental Research, 13(5), 585–597. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu, J. G., and Z. H. **e, 2013: Improving simulation of soil moisture in China using a multiple meteorological forcing ensemble approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 3355–3369, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3355-2013.
Loveland, T. R., B. C. Reed, J. F. Brown, D. O. Ohlen, Z. Zhu, L. Yang, and J. W. Merchant, 2000: Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 21(6–7), 1303–1330, https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210191.
Lu, H., D. H. Zheng, K. Yang, and F. Yang, 2020: Last-decade progress in understanding and modeling the land surface processes on the Tibetan Plateau. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24, 5745–5758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5745-2020.
Makarieva, A. M., V. G. Gorshkov, D. Sheil, A. D. Nobre, P. Bunyard, and B. L. Li, 2014: Why does air passage over forest yield more rain? Examining the coupling between rainfall, pressure, and atmospheric moisture content Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, 411–426, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0190.1.
Niu, G. Y., Z. L. Yang, R. E. Dickinson, L. E. Gulden, and H. Su, 2007: Development of a simple groundwater model for use in climate models and evaluation with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment data. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 112, D07103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007522.
Nearing, G.S., D.M. Mocko, C.D. Peters-Lidard, S.V. Kumar, and Y. **a, 2016: Benchmarking NLDAS-2 soil moisture and evapotranspiration to separate uncertainty contributions. J. Hydrometeor., 17(3), 745–759, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0063.1.
Oleson, K. W., and Coauthors, 2007: CLM 3.5 documentation, 34 pp. [available online from http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/tss/clm/distribution/clm3.5/CLM3_5documentation.pdf.]
Oleson, K. W., and Coauthors, 2008: Improvements to the Community Land Model and their impact on the hydrological cycle. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 113, G01021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000563.
Oleson, K. W., and Coauthors, 2013: Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-503+STR, 422 pp.
Ran, Y. H., X. Li, L. Lu, and Z. Y. Li, 2012: Large-scale land cover map** with the integration of multi-source information based on the Dempster-Shafer theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(1), 169–191, https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.577745.
Rodell, M., and Coauthors, 2004: The global land data assimilation system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85, 381–394, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381.
Shangguan, W., Y. J. Dai, B. Y. Liu, A. Z. Ye, and H. Yuan, 2012: A soil particle-size distribution dataset for regional land and climate modelling in China. Geoderma, 171–172, 85–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.013.
Shangguan, W., and Coauthors, 2013: A China data set of soil properties for land surface modeling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 5(2), 212–224, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20026.
Sheffield, J., G. Goteti, and E. F. Wood, 2006: Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J. Climate, 19, 3088–3111, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1.
Sheffield, J., and E. F. Wood, 2007: Characteristics of global andregional drought, 1950–2000: Analysis of soil moisture data from off-line simulation of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D17115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008288.
Shi, X. Y., J. F. Mao, P. E. Thornton, and M. Y. Huang, 2013: Spatiotemporal patterns of evapotranspiration in response to multiple environmental factors simulated by the Community Land Model. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024012.
Sun, S. B., B. Z. Chen, Q. Q. Shao, J. Chen, J. Y. Liu, X. J. Zhang, H. F. Zhang, and X. F. Lin, 2017: Modeling evapotranspiration over China’s Landmass from 1979 to 2012 using multiple land surface models: Evaluations and analyses. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18, 1185–1203, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0212.1.
Swenson, S. C., and D. M. Lawrence, 2012: A new fractional snow-covered area parameterization for the Community Land Model and its effect on the surface energy balance. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 117, D21107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018178.
Tian, Y., R. E. Dickinson, L. Zhou, and M. Shaikh, 2004: Impact of new land boundary conditions from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data on the climatology of land surface variables. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 109, D20115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004499.
Wang, A. H., and X. B. Zeng, 2011: Sensitivities of terrestrial water cycle simulations to the variations of precipitation and air temperature in China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 116, D02107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014659.
Wang, A. H., X. B. Zeng, and D. L. Guo, 2016: Estimates of global surface hydrology and heat fluxes from the Community Land Model (CLM4.5) with four atmospheric forcing datasets. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 17, 2493–2510, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0041.1.
Wang, K. C., and R. E. Dickinson, 2012: A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000373.
Wu, L. Z., and X. Li, 2004: China Glacier Information System. China Ocean Press, 135 pp. (in Chinese)
**a, Y. L., J. Sheffield, M. B. Ek, J. R. Dong, N. Chaney, H. L. Wei, J. Meng, and E. F. Wood, 2014: Evaluation of multi-model simulated soil moisture in NLDAS-2, Journal of Hydrology, 512, 107–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.027.
**e, Z. P., Z. Y. Hu, Z. H. **e, B. H. Jia, G. H. Sun, Y. Z. Du, and H. Q. Song, 2018: Impact of the snow cover scheme on snow distribution and energy budget modeling over the Tibetan Plateau. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 131(3–4), 951–965, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-2020-6.
Yang, K., and J. He, 2019: China meteorological forcing dataset (1979–2018). National Tibetan Plateau Data Center, https://doi.org/10.11888/AtmosphericPhysics.tpe.249369.file.
Yu, Y., Z. H. **e, Y. Y. Wang, and F. Chen, 2014: Results of a CLM4 land surface simulation over China using a multisource integrated land cover dataset. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 7, 279–285, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.13.0083.
Zhang, Q., and Coauthors, 2020: Causes and changes of drought in China: Research progress and prospects. J. Meteor. Res., 34(3), 460–481, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-9829-8.
Zhang, S. Q., 2002: An introduction of wetland science database in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(2), 189. (in Chinese)
Zhang, Y. F., and Z. L. Yang, 2016: Estimating uncertainties in the newly developed multi-source land snow data assimilation system. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 121, 8254–8268, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024248.
Zheng, H., and Z. L. Yang, 2016: Effects of soil-type datasets on regional terrestrial water cycle simulations under different climatic regimes. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 121, 14 387–14 402, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025187.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2020JJ4074), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (Grant No. 2019QZKK0206), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2021073), the National Key Scientific and Technological Infrastructure project “Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility” (EarthLab), and the Huaihua University Double First-Class Initiative Applied Characteristic Discipline of Control Science and Engineering.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• A series of experiments with different land surface models, forcing datasets, and parameter datasets were conducted.
• The meteorological forcing is the most important factor governing output.
• A refined land surface model driven by observation-based meteorological forcing and land surface parameters can better model hydrological processes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Yang, ZL., Jia, B. et al. Elucidating Dominant Factors Affecting Land Surface Hydrological Simulations of the Community Land Model over China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 40, 235–250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2091-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2091-5