Log in

The impact of the laser fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of the fiber–tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model.

Methods

Four lasers were tested at 60 W using a 600-µm bare-ended fiber: a continuous wave (cw) thulium fiber laser (TFL), a super pulsed (SP) TFL, a Ho:YAG laser, and a blue diode laser (BDL). All tissue samples were mounted on a motorized XY-translation stage. The fiber–tissue distance was changed within a range from 0to 6 mm. Ten incisions were made with each laser at each distance. Afterwards, the tissue samples were sliced with a microtome for lactate dehydrogenase staining to determine zones of thermal damage.

Results

In contact mode, the largest incision depth was found for the cw TFL (1.7 ± 0.1 mm) compared to the SP TFL (1.0 ± 0.1 mm), BDL (0.9 ± 0.1 mm) and HoYAG laser (1.1 ± 0.1 mm), respectively. With regard to the coagulative properties, the SP TFL and the Ho:YAG laser showed comparable coagulation depths with 0.7 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. At 2 mm fiber–tissue distance, the Ho:YAG laser was the only laser that vaporized tissue (incision depth: 0.2 ± 0.1 mm). The BDL was the only laser that caused coagulation at a distance of 3–5 mm.

Conclusion

Our results support the clinical observation that cw TFL must be defocused for best coagulation, while the coagulation depth of the SP TFL remains nearly constant within the range of 0–3 mm. Increasing the distance of the laser fiber to the tissue up to 5 mm did not cause significant differences with regard to coagulation depth using the BDL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herrmann TRW, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U et al (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61:783–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach T, Muschter R, Sroka R et al (2012) Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences. Eur Urol 61:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Enikeev D, Okhunov Z, Rapoport L et al (2018) Novel thulium fiber laser for enucleation of prostate: a retrospective comparison with open simple prostatectomy. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker B, Enikeev D, Glybochko P et al (2019) Effect of optical fiber diameter and laser emission mode (cw vs pulse) on tissue damage profile using 1.94 µm Tm:fiber lasers in a porcine kidney model. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02944-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang D-L, Yang Z, Liu G-X et al (2019) A novel 450-nm blue laser system for surgical applications: efficacy of specific laser-tissue interactions in bladder soft tissue. Lasers Med Sci 34:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2668-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun A, Kettner M, Berthold M et al (2018) Efficiency of soft tissue incision with a novel 445-nm semiconductor laser. Lasers Med Sci 33:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2320-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Traxer O, Rapoport L, Tsarichenko D et al (2018) V03–02 first clinical study on superpulse thulium fiber laser for lithotripsy. J Urol 199:e321–e322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Traxer O, Keller EX (2019) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 8:S398–S417. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.08.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa I, Okamoto T, Morita S et al (2011) Blue-violet light emitting diode (LED) irradiation immediately controls socket bleeding following tooth extraction: clinical and electron microscopic observations. Photomed Laser Surg 29:333–338. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Emiliani E, Talso M, Haddad M et al (2018) The true ablation effect of holmium YAG laser on soft tissue. J Endourol 32:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang HW, Choi BB (2019) Dependence of laser-induced tissue ablation on optical fiber movements for laser prostatectomy. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03019-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fried NM, Murray KE (2005) High-power thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary tissues at 1.94 microm. J Endourol 19:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cecchetti W, Zattoni F, Nigro F, Tasca A (2004) Plasma bubble formation induced by holmium laser: an in vitro study. Urology 63:586–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yaroslavsky I, Kovalenko A, Arkhipova V et al (2018) Comparison of a novel 450-nm laser with Ho:YAG (2100 nm), Tm fiber (1940 nm), and KTP (532 nm) lasers for soft-tissue ablation. In: Kang HW, Chan KF (eds) Therapeutics and diagnostics in urology 2018. SPIE, San Francisco, p 15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherwood ME, Flotte TJ (2007) Improved staining method for determining the extent of thermal damage to cells. Lasers Surg Med 39:128–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Enikeev D, Netsch C, Rapoport L et al (2019) Novel thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a prospective comparison with conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Int J Urol 26:1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L et al (2018) Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol 18:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0400-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornu J-N, Ahyai S, Bachmann A et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67:1066–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE (1992) Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med 12:353–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arkhipova V, Enikeev M, Laukhtina E et al (2019) Ex vivo and animal study of the blue diode laser, Tm fiber laser, and their combination for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Lasers Surg Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meskawi M, Hueber P-A, Valdivieso R et al (2019) Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532-nm-laser photo-vaporization Greenlight XPS-180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia. World J Urol 37:1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2560-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen C-H, Chiang P-H, Lee W-C et al (2012) High-intensity diode laser in combination with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a new strategy for the treatment of large prostates (>80 ml). Lasers Surg Med 44:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hess MM, Fleischer S, Ernstberger M (2018) New 445 nm blue laser for laryngeal surgery combines photoangiolytic and cutting properties. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:1557–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4974-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore, share collective responsibility and accountability for the results. T: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. N: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. E: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. G: project development, manuscript editing. H: project development, manuscript editing. K: project development, manuscript editing. L: project development, data collection, data analysis. G: project development, manuscript editing. B: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Becker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not necessary in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taratkin, M., Netsch, C., Enikeev, D. et al. The impact of the laser fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model. World J Urol 39, 1607–1612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03326-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03326-5

Keywords

Navigation