Log in

Identification of the intraparotid facial nerve on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Accurate preoperative localization of the intraparotid facial nerve (IFN) on MRI could reduce intraoperative injury. This study aimed to assess the detection rate of the IFN and its branches on MRI.

Methods

PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles published up to October 2019. The inclusion criteria were (a) adults, (b) MRI-based identification of IFN by radiologists, (c) original articles, and (d) detailed results to assess the proportion of visible IFN. Two radiologists reviewed the original articles. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was utilized to calculate the pooled estimates. Between-studies heterogeneity was evaluated using the chi-squared statistic test and Higgins’ inconsistency index (I2). A subgroup meta-regression was performed to explore the factors causing study heterogeneity.

Results

Nine original articles with 209 subjects were included. MRI reported a high pooled detection rate of 99.8% (95% CI, 98.4–100%) for the main trunk of the IFN. The pooled rates for the temporofacial and cervicofacial branches were 90.4% (95% CI, 84.1–96.7%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 96.1–99.5%), respectively. Heterogeneity was detected only in the temporofacial branch (I2 = 83%) as a result of both slice thickness and the use of steady-state sequences with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) implementation.

Conclusions

MRI showed an overall high detection rate of the IFN and its branches. Furthermore, an increased identification was observed in studies that used a slice thickness of < 1 mm and steady-state sequences with DWI implementation.

Key Points

• MRI showed an overall high detection rate of the intraparotid facial nerve and its branches.

• Higher detection rate was observed in studies that used a slice thickness of < 1 mm and steady-state sequences with diffusion-weighted imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

bFFE:

Balanced fast-field echo

CISS:

Constructive interference in the steady state

DESS:

Dual-echo steady state

GRASS:

Gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state

GRE:

Gradient echo

IFN:

Intraparotid facial nerve

PSIF:

Reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession

QUADAS-2:

Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2

SE:

Spin echo

SSFP:

Steady-state free precession

References

  1. Dulak D, Naqvi IA (2018) Neuroanatomy, cranial nerve 7 (facial) StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing

  2. Dulguerov P, Marchal F, Lehmann W (1999) Postparotidectomy facial nerve paralysis: possible etiologic factors and results with routine facial nerve monitoring. Laryngoscope 109:754–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grosheva M, Klussmann JP, Grimminger C et al (2009) Electromyographic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy for benign lesions does not improve the outcome of postoperative facial nerve function: a prospective two-center trial. Laryngoscope 119:2299–2305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laccourreye H, Laccourreye O, Cauchois R, Jouffre V, Ménard M, Brasnu D (1994) Total conservative parotidectomy for primary benign pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: a 25-year experience with 229 patients. Laryngoscope 104:1487–1494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meier JD, Wenig BL, Manders EC, Nenonene EK (2006) Continuous intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in predicting postoperative injury during parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 116:1569–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Upton DC, McNamar JP, Connor NP, Harari PM, Hartig GK (2007) Parotidectomy: ten-year review of 237 cases at a single institution. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:788–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Witt RL (1999) Facial nerve function after partial superficial parotidectomy: an 11-year review (1987-1997). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:210–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Z, Chen YA, Chow D, Talbott J, Glastonbury C, Shah V (2019) Practical applications of CISS MRI in spine imaging. Eur J Radiol Open 6:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahara T, Hendrikse J, Yamashita T et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted MR neurography of the brachial plexus: feasibility study. Radiology 249:653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, Bizzell C, Flammang A, Soldatos T (2011) 3 T MR neurography using three-dimensional diffusion-weighted PSIF: technical issues and advantages. Skeletal Radiol 40:1355–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chhabra A, Soldatos T, Subhawong TK et al (2011) The application of three-dimensional diffusion-weighted PSIF technique in peripheral nerve imaging of the distal extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu J, Zhou Z, Hong G et al (2013) High-resolution MRI of the intraparotid facial nerve based on a microsurface coil and a 3d reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession DWI sequence at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1643–1648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Attyé A, Karkas A, Troprès I et al (2016) Parotid gland tumours: MR tractography to assess contact with the facial nerve. Eur Radiol 26:2233–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Y, Yang B (2018) Value of visualization of the intraparotid facial nerve and parotid duct using a micro surface coil and three-dimensional reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession and diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. J Craniofac Surg 29:e754–e757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guenette JP, Ben-Shlomo N, Jayender J et al (2019) MR imaging of the extracranial facial nerve with the CISS sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suh CH, Park SH (2016) Successful publication of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. Korean J Radiol 17:5–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 16:1188–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol 16:1175–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons

  22. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ishibashi M, Fujii S, Kawamoto K et al (2010) The ability to identify the intraparotid facial nerve for locating parotid gland lesions in comparison to other indirect landmark methods: evaluation by 3.0 T MR imaging with surface coils. Neuroradiology 52:1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li C, Li Y, Zhang D, Yang Z, Wu L (2012) 3D-FIESTA MRI at 3 T demonstrating branches of the intraparotid facial nerve, parotid ducts and relation with benign parotid tumours. Clin Radiol 67:1078–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Naganawa S, Ishihara S, Satake H, Kawai H, Sone M, Nakashima T (2010) Simultaneous three-dimensional visualization of the intra-parotid facial nerve and parotid duct using a three-dimensional reversed FISP sequence with diffusion weighting. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qin Y, Zhang J, Li P, Wang Y (2011) 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation MR imaging of the intraparotid facial nerve at 1.5 T: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1167–1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi N, Okamoto K, Ohkubo M, Kawana M (2005) High-resolution magnetic resonance of the extracranial facial nerve and parotid duct: demonstration of the branches of the intraparotid facial nerve and its relation to parotid tumours by MRI with a surface coil. Clin Radiol 60:349–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta S, Mends F, Hagiwara M, Fatterpekar G, Roehm PC (2013) Imaging the facial nerve: a contemporary review. Radiol Res Pract 2013

  30. Lee JH, Cheng K-L, Choi YJ, Baek JH (2017) High-resolution imaging of neural anatomy and pathology of the neck. Korean J Radiol 18:180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Beaulieu C (2002) The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system–a technical review. NMR Biomed 15:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D (1994) MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 66:259–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon NG, Kliot M (2014) Diffusion weighted MRI and tractography for evaluating peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration. Neural Regen Res 9:2122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hiltunen J, Suortti T, Arvela S, Seppä M, Joensuu R, Hari R (2005) Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of distal peripheral nerves at 3 T. Clin Neurophysiol 116:2315–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Hachiya J (2004) Evaluation of MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle using a balanced fast-field-echo sequence: preliminary findings. Eur Radiol 14:239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jung NY, Moon W-J, Lee MH, Chung EC (2007) Magnetic resonance cisternography: comparison between 3-dimensional driven equilibrium with sensitivity encoding and 3-dimensional balanced fast-field echo sequences with sensitivity encoding. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:588–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dailiana T, Chakeres D, Schmalbrock P, Williams P, Aletras A (1997) High-resolution MR of the intraparotid facial nerve and parotid duct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:165–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Piagkou M, Tzika M, Paraskevas G, Natsis K (2013) Anatomic variability in the relation between the retromandibular vein and the facial nerve: a case report, literature review and classification. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 72:371–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Touré G, Vacher C (2010) Relations of the facial nerve with the retromandibular vein: anatomic study of 132 parotid glands. Surg Radiol Anat 32:957–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McGhee R, Chakeres D, Schmalbrock P, Brogan M, Negulesco J (1993) The extracranial facial nerve: high resolution three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:465–472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Veillon F, Ramos-Taboada L, Abu-Eid M, Charpiot A, Riehm S (2010) Imaging of the facial nerve. Eur J Radiol 74:341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Raghavan P, Mukherjee S, Phillips CD (2009) Imaging of the facial nerve. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 19:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangsean Choi.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Bum-soo Kim.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methodology

• Meta-analysis

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1946 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, MK., Choi, Y., Jang, J. et al. Identification of the intraparotid facial nerve on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31, 629–639 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07222-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07222-9

Keywords

Navigation