Log in

Intermediate analysis of magnesium alloy covered stent for a lateral aneurysm model in the rabbit common carotid artery

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the outcomes of a magnesium alloy covered stent (MACS) for a lateral aneurysm model in common carotid artery (CCA).

Methods

In 32 rabbits, a MACS (group A, n = 17) or a Willis covered stent (WCS; group B, n = 15) was inserted and the rabbits were sacrificed 1, 3, 6, or 12 months after stenting. Angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Scanning electron microscopy was performed for six stents in each group at 1, 3, and 6 months, and histopathology and histomorphology were conducted at 3 (n = 4), 6 (n = 4), and 12 (n = 12) months.

Results

Final angiography showed complete occlusion of the aneurysms in 12 cases. IVUS at 6 and 12 months revealed a significant increase in mean lumen area of the stented CCA in group A and also showed greater mean lumen area in group A than in group B. The endothelialization process was quicker in group A than in group B.

Conclusion

MACS is effective for occlusion of lateral aneurysms and is superior to WCS in growth of the stented CCA and endothelialization. Further work is needed to make this device available for human use.

Key points

The MACS is an effective approach for occlusion of a lateral aneurysm.

IVUS showed that the CCA could grow following degradation of the MACS.

The lumen area of the stented CCA was excellent in MACS.

HE staining displayed the degradation of the magnesium alloy stent.

Combination of IVUS and DSA were applied in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MACS:

Magnesium alloy covered stent

WCS:

Willis covered stent

CCA:

Common carotid artery

3D-TOF-MRA:

Three dimensional time-of-flight of magnetic resonance angiography

CA:

Cerebral aneurysm

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

IVUS:

Intravascular ultrasound

References

  1. Li MH, Chen SW, Li YD, Chen YC, Cheng YS, Hu DJ et al (2013) Prevalence of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Chinese Adults Aged 35 to 75 Years: A Cross-sectional Study. Ann Intern Med 159:514–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakagawa T, Hashi K (1994) The incidence and treatment of asymptomatic, unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 80:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ (2007) Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 369:306–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ (2011) Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:626–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frösen J, Tulamo R, Paetau A, Laaksamo E, Korja M, Laakso A et al (2012) Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 123:773–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW (2006) Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 355:928–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN et al (2009) American Heart Association. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 40:994–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wardlaw JM, White PM (2000) The detection and management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Brain 123:205–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J et al (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clip** versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mordasini P, Schroth G, Guzman R, Barth A, Seiler RW, Remonda L (2005) Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils: a 10-year single-center experience with special regard to technical development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1732–1738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szikora I, Seifert P, Hanzely Z, Kulcsar Z, Berentei Z, Marosfoi M et al (2006) Histopathologic evaluation of aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils or matrix detachable microcoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:283–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bavinzski G, Talazoglu V, Killer M, Richling B, Gruber A, Gross CE et al (1999) Gross and microscopic histopathological findings in aneurysms of the human brain treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 91:284–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Urso PI, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2011) Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: A review. Stroke 42:2363–2368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR et al (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: The Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li YD, Li MH, Gao BL, Fang C, Cheng YS, Wang W et al (2010) Endovascular treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with re-coiling or covered stents. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:74–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Luo QY, Cheng YS (2009) Treatment of Distal Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm with the Willis Covered Stent: A Prospective Pilot Study. Radiology 253:470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. John S, Bain MD, Hui FK, Hussain MS, Masaryk TJ, Rasmussen PA et al (2016) Long-term Follow-up of In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Flow Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery 78:862–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vargas SA, Diaz C, Herrera DA, Dublin AB (2016) Intracranial Aneurysms in Children: The Role of Stenting and Flow-Diversion. J Neuroimaging 26:41–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkland NT (2012) Magnesium biomaterials: past, present and future. Corros Eng Sci Technol 47:322–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J, Bonnier J, de Bruyne B, Eberli FR et al (2007) PROGRESS-AMS (Clinical Performance and Angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting with Absorbable Metal Stents) Investigators. Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 369:1869–1875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waksman R, Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J, de Bruyne B, Eberli FR et al (2009) PROGRESS-AMS (Clinical Performance Angiographic Results of Coronary Stenting with Absorbable Metal Stents) Investigators. Early- and long-term intravascular ultrasound and angiographic findings after bioabsorbable magnesium stent implantation in human coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:312–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yue Y, Wang L, Yang N, Huang J, Lei L, Ye H et al (2015) Effectiveness of Biodegradable Magnesium Alloy Stents in Coronary Artery and Femoral Artery. J Interv Cardiol 28:358–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mao L, Yuan GY, Niu JL, Zong Y, Ding WJ (2013) In vitro degradation behavior and biocompatibility of Mg- Nd-Zn- Zr alloy by hydro fluoric acid treatment. Mater Sci Eng C 33:242–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu F, Chen C, Niu J, Pei J, Zhang H, Huang H et al (2015) The processing of Mg alloy micro-tubes for biodegradable vascular stents. Mater Sci Eng C, Mater Biol Appl 48:400–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE et al (1992) Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:267–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chu Z, Zheng Q, Guo M, Yao J, Xu P, Feng W et al (2016) The effect of fluid shear stress on the in vitro degradation of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) acid membranes. J Biomed Mater Res A 104:2315–2324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reneman RS, Arts T, Hoeks AP (2006) Wall shear stress--an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure--in the arterial system in vivo. Discrepancies with theory. J Vasc Res 43:251–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen HY, Koo BK, Kassab GS (2015) Impact of bifurcation dual stenting on endothelial shear stress. J Appl Physiol (1985) 119:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haude M, Erbel R, Erne P, Verheye S, Degen H, Böse D et al (2013) Safety and performance of the drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold (DREAMS) in patients with de-novo coronary lesions: 12 month results of the prospective, multicentre, first-in-man BIOSOLVE-I trial. Lancet 381:836–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maeng M, Jensen LO, Falk E, Andersen HR, Thuesen L (2009) Negative vascular remodelling after implantation of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in porcine coronary arteries: a randomised comparison with bare-metal and sirolimus-eluting stents. Heart 95:241–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghimire G, Spiro J, Kharbanda R, Roughton M, Barlis P, Mason M et al (2009) Initial evidence for the return of coronary vasoreactivity following the absorption of bioabsorbable magnesium alloy coronary stents. EuroIntervention 4:481–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li H, Zhong H, Xu K, Yang K, Liu J, Zhang B et al (2011) Enhanced efficacy of sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium alloy stents in the prevention of restenosis. J Endovasc Ther 18:407–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Yong-Dong Li.

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

This work was supported the National Health and Family Planning Commission [grant number 201301006], the Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [grant number YG2015MS11], the Special Project of Chinese National Key R & D Program [grant number 2016YFC1102400], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 51571143], the Foundation of Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology Development of China [grant number 1241191201], and the Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [grant number 20124175].

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported.

Methodology:

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Dong Li, Yong-Li Wang or Guang-Yin Yuan.

Additional information

Fen-Bao Li is Co-first author

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 1262 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, Hk., Li, FB., Guo, YC. et al. Intermediate analysis of magnesium alloy covered stent for a lateral aneurysm model in the rabbit common carotid artery. Eur Radiol 27, 3694–3702 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4715-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4715-6

Keywords

Navigation