Log in

New urate depositions on dual-energy computed tomography in gouty arthritis during urate-lowering therapy

  • Imaging
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reduction of urate depositions in the joints, on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), in patients with gout during urate-lowering therapy (ULT) was demonstrated in previous studies. The aim of this study was to further investigate the changes in distribution of urate deposits during ULT. This randomized controlled trial enrolled 46 patients diagnosed with gout from Zhongshan Hospital, China, between October 2013 and June 2014. Epidemiological data, serum uric acid level, and arthritis attacks were recorded at monthly follow-up visits. DECT of bilateral feet and ankles was performed at baseline and after 6 months of ULT. Overall, 163 areas of urate deposition were found in the 46 patients; of these, 133/163 (81.6%) areas were associated with former arthritis attacks. On DECT at 6 months, the number of urate deposits decreased to 126, with 68 areas disappearing and 31 new deposits areas. The mean volume of urate deposits at baseline was 1.3 ± 3.8 cm3, decreasing to 0.6 ± 2.1 cm3 at the end of 6 months (P = 0.01), with 3/46 (6.5%) patients showing complete disappearance of urate deposits. New urate depositions were found in 21/46 (45.7%) patients, while urate depositions in some joints disappeared in some joints in 31/46 (67.4%) patients. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was significantly lower in patients with new deposits (4.6 ± 9.3 vs. 7.1 ± 7.6 mg/dL; P = 0.01). There is dynamic redistribution of urate depositions in gout patients receiving ULT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roddy E, Doherty M (2010) Epidemiology of gout. Arthritis Res Ther 12:223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu HJ, Liao MY, Xu LY (2015) Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for gout diagnosis. Clin Imaging 39(5):880–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Melzer R, Pauli C, Treumann T, Krauss B (2014) Gout tophus detection—a comparison of dual-energy CT (DECT) and histology. Semin Arthritis Rheum 43(5):662–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalbeth N, Choi HK (2013) Dual-energy computed tomography for gout diagnosis and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15(1):301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neogi R, Th Tim L, Jansen A, Dalbeth N et al (2015) Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 74(10):1789–1798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JH, Lan JL, Chen CF, Liang WM, Lin HY, Tsay GJ et al (2015) Effect of urate-lowering therapy on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hyperuricemic patients without gout: a case-matched cohort study. PLoS One 10(12):e0145193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna PP, Gladue HS, Singh MK, FitzGerald JD, Bae S, Prakash S et al (2014) Treatment of acute gout: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44(1):31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Ying, LiliMA Yi Zhou et al (2015) Features of urate deposition in patients with gouty arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 18(5):560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun Y, Chen H, Zhang Z, Ma L, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Ding Y, ** X, Jiang L (2015) Dual-energycomputed tomography for monitoring the effect of urate-lowering therapy in gouty arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 18(8):880–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF (1977) Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 20(3):895–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E et al (2017) 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 76(1):29–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinik O, Wechalekar MD, Falzon L, Buchbinder R, van der Heijde DM, Bombardier C (2014) Treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia for the prevention of gouty arthritis, renal disease, and cardiovascular events: a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol Suppl 92:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi D, Xu JX, Wu HX, Wang Y, Zhou QJ, Yu RS (2015) Methods of assessment of tophus and bone erosions in gout using dual-energy CT: reproducibility analysis. Clin Rheumatol 34(4):755–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mallinson PI, Reagan AC, Coupal T, Munk PL, Ouellette H, Nicolaou S (2014) The distribution of urate deposition with the extremities in gout: a review of 148 dual-energy CT cases. Skelet Radiol 43(3):277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajan A, Aati O, Kalluru R, Gamble GD, Horne A, Doyle AJ et al (2013) Lack of change in urate deposition by dual-energy computed tomography among clinical stable patients with long-standing tophaceous gout: a prospective longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther 15(5):R160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dalbeth N, Doyle AJ, McQueen FM, Sundy J, Baraf HS (2014) Exploratory study of radiographic change in patients with tophaceous gout treated with intensive irate-lowering therapy. Arthritis Care Res 66(1):82–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Araujo Elizabeth G, Bayat Sara, Petsch Christina et al (2015) Tophus resolution with pegloticase: a prospective dual-energy CT study. RMD Open 1(1):e000075. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K, Koenig N, Reid G, Abufayyah M et al (2012) Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 71(9):1466–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baer AN, Kurano T, Thakur UJ et al (2016) Dual-energy computed tomography has limited sensitivity for non-tophaceous gout: a comparison study with tophaceous gout. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:91

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Manger B, Lell M, Wacker J, Schett G, Rech J (2012) Detection of periarticular urate deposits with dual energy CT in patients with acute gouty arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 71(3):470–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glazebrook KN, Kakar S, Ida CM et al (2012) False-negative dual-energy computed tomography in a patient with acute gout. J Clin Rheumatol 18(3):138–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Scientific Research Project from Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai, China (grant no. 20154Y0061) and Young Investigator Award of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan university, China (grant no. 2015ZSQN21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindi Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Zhuojun Zhang declares that she has no conflict of interest. **aojie Zhang declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ying Sun declares that she has no conflict of interest. Huiyong Chen declares that he has no conflict of interest. **ufang Kong declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jianjun Zhou declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yi Zhou declares that he has no conflict of interest. Lili Ma declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lindi Jiang declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Sun, Y. et al. New urate depositions on dual-energy computed tomography in gouty arthritis during urate-lowering therapy. Rheumatol Int 37, 1365–1372 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3724-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3724-3

Keywords

Navigation