Abstract
Mathematical modelling of the evolution of the size-spectrum dynamics in aquatic ecosystems was discovered to be a powerful tool to have a deeper insight into impacts of human- and environmental driven changes on the marine ecosystem. In this article we propose to investigate such dynamics by formulating and investigating a suitable model. The underlying process for these dynamics is given by predation events, causing both growth and death of individuals, while kee** the total biomass within the ecosystem constant. The main governing equation investigated is deterministic and non-local of quadratic type, coming from binary interactions. Predation is assumed to strongly depend on the ratio between a predator and its prey, which is distributed around a preferred feeding preference value. Existence of solutions is shown in dependence of the choice of the feeding preference function as well as the choice of the search exponent, a constant influencing the average volume in water an individual has to search until it finds prey. The equation admits a trivial steady state representing a died out ecosystem, as well as—depending on the parameter-regime—steady states with gaps in the size spectrum, giving evidence to the well known cascade effect. The question of stability of these equilibria is considered, showing convergence to the trivial steady state in a certain range of parameters. These analytical observations are underlined by numerical simulations, with additionally exhibiting convergence to the non-trivial equilibrium for specific ranges of parameters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen KH, Beyer JE (2006) Asymptotic size determines species abundance in the marine size spectrum. Am Nat 168(1):54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3844675
Andersen KH, Beyer JE (2015) Size structure, not metabolic scaling rules, determines fisheries reference points. Fish Fish 16:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12042
Benoît E, Rochet M-J (2004) A continuous model of biomass size spectra governed by predation and the effects of fishing on them. J Theor Biol 226(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00290-X
Blanchard JL, Heneghan RF, Everett JD, Trebilco R, Richardson AJ (2017) From bacteria to whales: using functional size spectra to model marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 32(3):174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.003
Boudreau P, Dickie L (1992) Biomass spectra of aquatic ecosystems in relation to fisheries yield. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49(8):1528–1538. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-169
Brilliantov N, Krapivsky PL, Bodrova A, Spahn F, Hayakawa H, Stadnichuk V, Schmidt J (2015) Size distribution of particles in Saturn’s rings from aggregation and fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(31):9536–9541
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-9000
Capitán JA, Delius GW (2010) Scale-invariant model of marine population dynamics. Phys Rev E 81(6):061901
Cercignani C, Illner R, Pulvirenti M (1994) The mathematical theory of dilute gases. Springer, New York
Cheng Z, Redner S (1990) Kinetics of fragmentation. J Phys A 23:1233–1258
Cuesta JA, Delius GW, Law R (2018) Sheldon spectrum and the plankton paradox: two sides of the same coin. A trait-based plankton size-spectrum model. J Math Biol 76(1):67–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1132-7
Datta S, Delius GW, Law R (2010) A Jump-growth model for predator–prey dynamics: derivation and application to marine ecosystems. Bull Math Biol 72(6):1361–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-009-9496-5
Datta S, Delius GW, Law R, Plank MJ (2011) A stability analysis of the power-law steady state of marine size spectra. J Math Biol 63(4):779–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0387-z
Dubovskii PB, Galkin VA, Stewart IW (1992) Exact solutions for the coagulation-fragmentation equation. J Phys A: Math Gen 25:4737–4744
Elton CS (1927) Animal ecology. MacMillan, New York
Ernst M, Pagonabarraga I (2007) The nonlinear fragmentation equation. J Phys A 40:F331–F337
Escobedo M, Mischler S, Perthame B (2002) Gelation in coagulation and fragmentation models. Commun Math Phys 231:157–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-002-0680-9
Escobedo M, Laurençot P, Mischler S (2004) On a kinetic equation for coalescing particles. Commun Math Phys 246:237–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-004-1037-3
Estes JA et al (2011) Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333(6040):301–306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1205106
Giri AK, Laurençot P (2021a) Weak solutions to the collision-induced breakage equation with dominating coagulation. J Differ Equ 280:690–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2021.01.043
Giri AK, Laurençot P (2021b) Existence and nonexistence for the collision-induced breakage equation. SIAM J Math Anal 53(4):4605–4636. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1386852
Hairston NG, Frederick ES, Lawrence BS (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 94(879):421–25
Huxley JS (1932) Problems of relative growth. Methuen, London
Kleiber M (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6(11):315–353. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315
McKendrick AG (1926) Applications of mathematics to medical problems. Proc Edinb Math Soc 40:98–130
Niethammer B, Velázquez JJL (2013) Self-similar solutions with fat tails for Smoluchowski’s coagulation equation with locally bounded kernels. Commun Math Phys 318:505–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-012-1553-5
Paloheimo JE, Dickie LM (1966) Food and growth of fishes. III. Relations among food, body size, and growth efficiency. J Fish Res Board Can 23:1209–1248
Perthame B (2006) Transport equations in biology. Birkhäuser, Basel
Rezakhanlou F, Villani C (2007) Entropy methods for the Boltzmann equation. Lecture notes in mathematics. Springer, Berlin
Rossberg AG, Gaedke U, Kratina P (2019) Dome patterns in pelagic size spectra reveal strong trophic cascades. Nat Commun 10:4396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12289-0
Sheldon RW, Prakash A, Sutcliffe WH Jr (1972) The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 17(3):327–340. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1972.17.3.0327
Sheldon RW, Sutcliffe WH Jr, Paranjape MA (1977) Structure of pelagic food chain and relationship between plankton and fish production. J Fish Res Board Can 34(12):2344–2353
Silvert W, Platt T (1978) Energy flux in the pelagic ecosystem: a time-dependent equation. Limnol Oceanogr 23(4):813–816. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1978.23.4.0813
Silvert W, Platt T (1980) Dynamic energy-flow model of the particle size distribution in pelagic ecosystems. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evol Ecol Zooplankt Commun. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 754–763
Smoluchowski M (1916) Drei Vorträge über diffusion, Brownsche Molekularbewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen. Phys Z 17(557–571):585–599 (in German)
Srivastava RC (1978) Parameterization of raindrop size distributions. J Atmos Sci 35:108–117
Villani C (2002) A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory. In: Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics, vol I. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 71–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-5792(02)80004-0
Ware DM (1978) Bioenergetics of pelagic fish: theoretical change in swimming speed and ration with body size. J Fish Board Can 35(2):220–228
Acknowledgements
We thank Nicolas Loeuille and Vincent Calvez for fruitful discussions, providing helpful insights and broadening our view on the existing literature. We also thank the careful referees for pointing out several improvements of a first version.
Funding
L.K. received funding by a Grant from the FORMAL team at ISCD - Sorbonne Université and by the European Commission under the Horizon2020 research and innovation programme, Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant agreement No 101034255. B.P. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No 740623).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Code availability
On request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanzler, L., Perthame, B. & Sarels, B. Structured model conserving biomass for the size-spectrum evolution in aquatic ecosystems. J. Math. Biol. 88, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-02043-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-02043-y