Log in

Biolixiviation of Metals from Computer Printed Circuit Boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Bioremoval of Metals by Mixed Culture Subjected to a Magnetic Field

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crushed and ground printed circuit board (PCB) samples were characterized to evaluate copper, lead, and aluminum using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) and the morphology was done by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The XRF characterizations showed 0.12% lead, 3.72% copper, and 12.73% aluminum in the PCBs. The metal solubilization experiments using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans indicated higher values of total metal solubilization when the initial pH of the inoculum was adjusted. However, these experiments did not show higher metal solubilization by bioleaching. The sequential bioremoval experiments using mixed culture after bioleaching assays with A. ferrooxidans with initial adjustment of inoculum pH and without applying a magnetic field removed 100% of Al, 27.34% of Cu, and 96.43% of Pb from the lixiviate medium; with magnetic field application, 100% of Al, 83.82% of Cu, and 98.27% of Pb were removed. A similar bioleaching experiment without inoculum pH adjustment and without field application achieved 99.74% removal for Cu and 91.92% for Pb. When the magnetic field was applied, 100% of Cu and 95.76% of Pb were removed. Bioreactors with a magnetic field do not show significantly better removal of any of the metals analyzed.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forti V, Baldé CP, Kuehr R, Bel G, The Global E-waste Monitor (2020) Quantities, Flows and the Circular Economy Potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)—co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam

  2. Demajorovic J, Augusto EGF, de Souza MTS (2016) Reverse logistics of e-waste in develo** countries. Ambiente Sociedade São Paulo 5(2):117–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awasthi AK, Zlamparet GL, Zeng X, Li J (2017) Evaluating waste printed circuit boards recycling: opportunities and challenges, a mini review. Waste Manag Res 35:346–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yaashikaa PR, Priyanka B, Kumar PS, Karishma S, Jeevanantham S, Indraganti S (2022) A review on recent advancements in recovery of valuable and toxic metals from e-waste using bioleaching approach. Chemosphere 287:132230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Yang M, Shi Q, Kuang X, Jerry QH, Wang T (2019) Recycling waste circuit board efficiently and environmentally friendly through small-molecule assisted dissolution. Sci Rep 9:17902. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-019-54045-W

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Q, Zhang B, Yu S, **ong J, Yao Z, Hu B, Yan J (2020) Waste-printed circuit board recycling: focusing on preparing polymer composites and geopolymers. ACS Omega 5(16):17850–17856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang K, Guo J, Xu Z (2009) Recycling of waste printed circuit boards: a review of current technologies and treatment status in China. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):399–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cucchiella F, D’adamo I, Lenny Koh SC, Rosa P (2015) Recycling of weees: an economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 51:263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Rser.2015.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Capitani (2009) Diagnóstico e tratamento da intoxicação por chumbo em crianças e adultos. Medicina 42(3):319–329

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birloaga I, de Michelis I, Ferella F, Buzatu M, Vegliò F (2013) Study on the influence of various factors in the hydrometallurgical processing of waste printed circuit boards for copper and gold recovery. Waste Manage 33:935–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sodha AB, Tipre DR, Dave SR (2020) Optimization of biohydrometallurgical batch reactor process for copper extraction and recovery from non-pulverized waste printed circuit boards. Hydrometallurgy 191:105170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Monneron-Enaud B, Wiche O, Schlömann M (2020) Biodismantling, a novel application of bioleaching in recycling of electronic wastes. Recycling 5:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling5030022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Li Q, Li Y, Sun X, Li J, Shen J, Han W, Wang L (2018) A Novel Approach for recovery of metals from waste printed circuit boards and simultaneous removal of iron from steel pickling waste liquor by two-step hydrometallurgical method. Waste Manage 71:411–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yken JV, Cheng KY, Boxall NJ, Nikoloski AN, Moheimani N, Valix M, Sahajwalla V, Kaksonen AH (2020) Potential of metals leaching from printed circuit boards with biological and chemical lixiviants. Hydrometallurgy 196:105433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Motaghed M, Mousavi SM, Rastegar SO, Shojaosadati SA (2014) Platinum and rhenium extraction from a spent refinery catalyst using Bacillus Megaterium as a cyanogenic bacterium. Statistical modeling and process optimization. Bioresource Technol 171:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Biortech.2014.08.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang G, Tang J, Liu W, Zhou Q (2013) Optimizing mixed culture of two acidophiles to improve copper recovery from printed circuit boards (PCBs). J Hazard Mater 250:238–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi M-S, Cho K-S, Kim D-S, Kim D-J (2004) Microbial recovery of copper from printed circuit boards of waste computer by Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans. J Environ Sci Health Part A 39(11):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brandl H, Faramarzi MA (2006) Microbe-metal-interaction for the biotechnological treatment of metal-containing solid waste. China Particuol 4(2):93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu W, Bai J, Lu L, Zhuang X, Zhao J, Yuan W, Zhang C, Wang J (2019) Improved bioleaching efficiency of metals from waste printed circuit boards by mechanical activation. Waste Manag 98:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dev S, Sachan A, Dehghani F, Ghosh T, Briggs A, Aggarwal S (2020) Mechanisms of biological recovery of rare-earth elements from industrial and electronic wastes: a review. Chem Eng J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boxall NJ, Cheng KY, Bruckard W, Kaksonen AH (2018) Application of indirect non-contact bioleaching for extracting metals from waste lithium-ion batteries. J Hazard Mater 360:504–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murugesan MP, Kannan K, Selvaganapathy T (2020) Bioleaching recovery of copper from printed circuit boards and optimization of various parameters using response surface methodology (RSM). Mater Today Proceedings 26(2):2720–2728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kasper AC, Viet HM (2018) Gold recovery from printed circuit boards of mobile phones scraps using a leaching solution alterative to cyanide. Braz J Chem Eng 35:931–942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fathollahzadeh H, Khaleque, H.N., Eksteen, J., Kaksonen, A.H., Watkin, E.L.J., (2019) Effect of glycine on bioleaching of rare earth elements from Western Australian monazite by heterotrophic and autotrophic microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy 189, 105137. Franke, D., Suponik.

  25. **a MC, Wang YP, Peng TJ, Shen L, Yu RL, Liu YD, Chen M, Li JK, Wu XL, Zeng WM (2017) Recycling of metals from pretreated waste printed circuit boards effectively in stirred tank reactor by a moderately thermophilic culture. J Biosci Bioeng 123:714–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.12.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hubau A et al (2018) Continuous production of a biogenic ferric iron lixiviant for the bioleaching of printed circuit boards (PCBs). Hydrometallurgy 180:180–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Adamo I, Ferella F, Gastaldi M, Maggiore F, Rosa P, Terzi S (2019) Towards sustainable recycling processes: wasted printed circuit boards as a source of economic opportunities. Resour Conserv Recycl 149:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava RR, Ilyas S, Kim H, Choi S, Trinh HB, Ghauri MA, Ilyas N (2020) Biotechnological recycling of critical metals from waste printed circuit boards. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 95:2796–2810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Faramarzi MA, Mogharabi-Manzaria MBH (2020) Bioleaching of metals from wastes and low-grade sources by HCN-forming microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy 191:105228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tomska A, Wolny L (2008) Enhancement of biological wastewater treatment by magnetic field exposure. Desalination 222:368–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zieliński M, Rusanowska P, Dębowski M, Hajduk A (2018) Influence of static magnetic field on sludge properties. Sci Total Environ 625:738–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dias RM, Cardoso VL, de Resende MM (2016) Influence of magnetic field frequency generated by permanent magnets in mixed culture used for the treatment of effluent contaminated with chromium. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dias RM, da Costa EJX, Cardoso VL, De Resende MM (2020) Interference of a magnetic field generated by circular magnets in the retention of chromium by microbial cells and in the morphology of a mixed culture during the bio-removal of chromium from effluent. Chem Eng Process 154:108019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia O Jr (1991) Isolation and purification of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans from some coal and uranium mines of Brazil. Rev Microbiol 22:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paulino LC, Bergamo RF, Mello MP, Garcia O Jr, Manfio GP, Ottoboni LMM (2001) Molecular characterization of Acidithiobacillus, ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans strains isolated from mine wastes in Brazil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 80:65–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dermou E, Velissariou A, Xenos D, Vayenas DV (2005) Biological chromium (VI) reduction using a trickling filter. J Hazardous Mater B126:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. **n B, Zhang D, Zhang X, **a Y, Wu F, Chen S, Li L (2009) Bioleaching mechanism of Co and Li from spent lithium-ion battery by the mixed culture of acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing and iron-oxidizing bacteria. Biores Technol 100(24):6163–6169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dias RM, Silva JG, Cardoso VL, de Resende MM (2020) Removal and desorption of chromium in synthetic effluent by a mixed culture in a bioreactor with a magnetic field. J Environ Sci 91:151–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. APHA, Awwa & WEF. In Rice, E. W., Baird, R. B., Eaton, A. D. (ed) (2017) 23rd edn. American Water Works Association; American Public Works Association; Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC

  40. Madigan, M.T. , Martinko, J.M., Dunlap, P.V., Clark , D. P., (2004) Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 12th Ed. - San Francisco, Calif.: Pearson/Benjamin Cummings.

  41. ABNT (1987) Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR 9898: Preservação e Técnicas de Amostragem de Efluentes Líquidos e Corpos Receptores, Rio de Janeiro.

  42. de Queiroz JRC, Marocho SS, Benetti P, Tango RN, Nogueira JL (2012) Métodos de caracterização de materiais para pesquisa em odontologia. Revistas Eletrônicas de Odontologia 17:1

    Google Scholar 

  43. Priya A, Hait S (2020) Biometallurgical recovery of metals from waste printed circuit boards using pure and mixed strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidiphilium, acidophilum. Process Saf Environ Prot 143:262–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gandolfi MG, Sauro S, Mannocci F, Watson TF, Zanna S, Capoferri M et al (2007) New tetrasilicate cements as retrograde filling material: an in vitro study on fluid penetration. J Endod 33:742–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ye M, Liang J, Liao X, Li L, Feng X, Zhou WQS, Sun S (2021) Bioleaching for detoxification of waste flotation tailings: Relationship between EPS substances and bioleaching behavior. J Environ Manage 111795:0301–4797

    Google Scholar 

  46. Utimura S, Arevalo SJ, Rosario CGA, Aguilar MQ, Tenório JAS, Espinosa DCR (2019) Bioleaching of metal from waste using a native strain of Acidithiobacillus isolate from a coal mine drainage. Can J Chem Eng 97(11):2920–2927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lebkowska M, Rutkowska-Narozniak A, Pajor E, Pochanke Z (2011) Effect of a static magnetic field on formaldehyde biodegradation in wastewater by activated sludge. Biores Technol 102:8777–8782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Maoyou Y, Yan P, Sun S, Han D, **ao X, Zheng L, Huang S, Chen Y, Zhuang S (2017) Bioleaching combined brine leaching of heavy metals from lead-zinc mine tailings: transformations during the leaching process. Chemosphere 168:1115–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rouchalova D, Rouchalova K, Janakova I, Cablik V, Janstova S (2020) Bioleaching of Iron, Copper, Lead, And Zinc From The Sludge Mining Sediment At Diferent Particle Sizes, Ph, And Pulp Density Using Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans. Minerals 10:1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/Min10111013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Abraham, J.; Chatterjee, A.; Sharma, J. (2020). Isolation and Characterization of a New Bacillus licheniformis Strain for Bioleaching Heavy Metals, J Appl Biotechnol Rep.7(3):139–144.

  51. Ji Y, Wang Y, Sun J, Yan T, Li J, Zhao T, Yin X, Sun C (2010) (2010) Enhancement of biological treatment of wastewater by magnetic field. Biores Technol 101:8535–8540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Federal University of Uberlândia, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—Process: 424724/2018-9 (CNPq-Brazil), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES-Brazil), and Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais for promoting research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors, JGS and RMD, were responsible for writing the Experimental part of the manuscript and writing it. Professors VLC and MMR guided the experiments and corrected the manuscript's text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Maria de Resende.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, J.G., da Silva, M.T., Dias, R.M. et al. Biolixiviation of Metals from Computer Printed Circuit Boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Bioremoval of Metals by Mixed Culture Subjected to a Magnetic Field. Curr Microbiol 80, 197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03307-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03307-y

Navigation