Log in

Multiplex STR panel for assessment of chimerism following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is used in chimerism monitoring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with various hematologic malignancies. Commercial forensic STR kits often contain loci with huge differences in power of discrimination (PD) across populations, causing some loci to be less informative for chimerism analysis in certain populations. This study aimed to construct a new STR multiplex panel with highly informative loci for efficient chimerism analysis. Thirteen STR markers which exhibit high PD (> 0.9) in at least 80% of 50 populations globally were selected to form a new panel and used in STR analysis of 253 Malaysian subjects. Cumulative power of discrimination (CPD) and combined power of exclusion (CPE) were determined from 253 Malaysian individuals. Loci informativity was assessed and compared to the commercial AmpFLSTR Identifiler PCR Amplification kit in 14 donor–recipient pairs. The new panel had detected 202 unique alleles including five novel alleles from the 253 individuals with high CPD and CPE (> 0.99999999999999999 and > 0.999999997 respectively). All loci from the new panel in the donor–recipient pair analysis showed higher than 50% informativity, while five loci from the commercial kit demonstrated lower than 50% informativity. Four loci from the new panel ranked the highest informativity. A sequenced allelic ladder which consists of 202 unique alleles from the 253 subjects was also developed to ensure accurate allele designation. The new 13-loci STR panel, thus, could serve as an additional powerful, accurate, and highly informative panel for chimerism analysis for HSCT patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

CPD:

Cumulative power of discrimination

CPE:

Combined power of exclusion

CV:

Coefficient of variance

GD:

Gene diversity

He:

Expected heterozygosity

Ho:

Observed heterozygosity

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

HWE:

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

MEC:

Mean paternity exclusion chance

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PDF :

Power of discrimination for female

PDM :

Power of discrimination for male

PE:

Probability of exclusion

PI:

Typical paternity index

PIC:

Polymorphism information content

PMF :

Matching probability for female

PMM :

Matching probability for male

SD:

Standard deviation

STR:

Short tandem repeat

UKMMC:

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

References

  1. Park B, Yoo KH, Kim C (2015) Hematopoietic stem cell expansion and generation: the ways to make a breakthrough. Blood Res 50(4):194–203. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2015.50.4.194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Ispizua AU (2003) The EBMT activity survey on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a novel instrument for quality control. Turk J Med Sci 33:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faraci M, Bagnasco F, Leoni M et al (2018) Evaluation of chimerism dynamics after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with Non-malignant diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 24(5):1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bader P, Niethammer D, Willasch A, Kreyenberg H, Klingebiel T (2005) How and when should we monitor chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation? Bone Marrow Transplant 35(2):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark JR, Scott SD, Jack AL, Lee H, Mason J, Carter GI, Pearce L, Jackson T, Clouston H, Sproul A, Keen L, Molloy K, Folarin N', Whitby L, Snowden JA, Reilly JT, Barnett D (2015) Monitoring of chimerism following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): technical recommendations for the use of short tandem repeat (STR) based techniques, on behalf of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service for Leucocyte Immunophenoty** Chimerism Working Group. Br J Haematol 168(1):26–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lion T, Watzinger F, Preuner S et al (2012) The EuroChimerism concept for a standardized approach to chimerism analysis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 26(8):1821–1828. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler JM (2012) Advanced topics in forensic DNA ty**: methodology. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  8. Butler JM (2005) Forensic DNA ty**: biology, technology, and genetics of STR markers. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  9. Butler JM (2005) Constructing STR multiplex assays. Methods Mol Biol 297:53–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler JM (2006) Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing. J Forensic Sci 51(2):253–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00046.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Bamshad MJ, Dixon ME, Ricker CE, Seielstad MT, Batzer MA (2000) The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data. Am J Hum Genet 66(3):979–988. https://doi.org/10.1086/302825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Romualdi C, Balding D, Nasidze IS et al (2002) Patterns of human diversity, within and among continents, inferred from biallelic DNA polymorphisms. Genome Res 12(4):602–612. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.214902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ariffin H, Daud SS, Mohamed Z et al (2007) Evaluation of two short tandem repeat multiplex systems for post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation chimerism analysis. Singap Med J 48(4):333–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han E, Kim M, Kim Y, Han K, Lim J, Kang D, Lee GD, Kim JR, Lee JW, Chung NG, Cho B, Eom KS, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Lee S, Cho SG, Min CK, Kim DW, Lee JW, Min WS (2017) Practical informativeness of short tandem repeat loci for chimerism analysis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Chim Acta 468:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saberzadeh J, Miri MR, Tabei MB, Dianatpour M, Fardaei M (2016) Genetic variations of 21 STR markers on chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y in the south Iranian population. Genet Mol Res 15(4):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr15049065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krenke BE, Tereba A, Anderson SJ et al (2002) Validation of a 16-locus fluorescent multiplex system. J Forensic Sci 47(4):773–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Butler JM, Schoske R, Vallone PM, Kline MC, Redd AJ, Hammer MF (2002) A novel multiplex for simultaneous amplification of 20 Y chromosome STR markers. Forensic Sci Int 129(1):10–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thiede C, Bornhauser M, Oelschlagel U et al (2001) Sequential monitoring of chimerism and detection of minimal residual disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation (BSCT) using multiplex PCR amplification of short tandem repeat-markers. Leukemia 15(2):293–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen DP, Tseng CP, Tsai SH et al (2008) Systematic analysis of stutters to enhance the accuracy of chimerism testing. Ann Clin Lab Sci 38(3):264–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10(3):564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodwin W, Linacre A, Hadi S (2007) An introduction to forensic genetics. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  22. Desmarais D, Zhong Y, Chakraborty R (1998) Development of a highly polymorphic STR marker for identity testing purposes at the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA). J Forensic Sci 43(5):1046–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fondevila M, Santos C, Phillips C et al (2011) An assessment of linkage between forensic markers: core STRs, mini-STRs and Indels. Proceedings of 22nd International Symposium of Human Identification, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Szibor R, Hering S, EdelmannJ (2006) A new web site compiling forensic chromosome X research is now online. Int J Legal Med 120(4):252–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-005-0029-y

  25. Seah LH, Jeevan NH, Othman MI, Jaya P, Ooi YS, Wong PC, Kee SS (2003) STR data for the AmpFlSTR Identifiler loci in three ethnic groups (Malay, Chinese, Indian) of the Malaysian population. Forensic Sci Int 138(1–3):134–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Rood JJ, Oudshoorn M (2008) Eleven million donors in bone marrow donors worldwide! Time for reassessment? Bone Marrow Transplant 41(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bar W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B et al (1997) DNA recommendations. Further report of the DNA commission of the ISFH regarding the use of short tandem repeat systems. International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics. Int J Legal Med 110(4):175–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gettings KB, Kiesler KM, Fait SA et al (2016) Sequence variation of 22 autosomal STR loci detected by next generation sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 21:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL (2011) Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet 13(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Odriozola A, Riancho JA, Colorado M, Zarrabeitia MT (2013) Evaluation of the sensitivity of two recently developed STR multiplexes for the analysis of chimerism after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 40(2):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-313X.2012.01123.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. ENFSI (2010) Recommended minimum criteria for the validation of various aspects of the DNA profiling process. http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/minimum_validation_guidelines_in_dna_profiling_-_v2010_0.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2015

  32. Zarrabeitia MT, Amigo T, Sanudo C et al (2002) Sequence structure and population data of two X-linked markers: DXS7423 and DXS8377. Int J Legal Med 116(6):368–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nollet F, Billiet J, Selleslag D, Criel A (2001) Standardisation of multiplex fluorescent short tandem repeat analysis for chimerism testing. Bone Marrow Transplant 28(5):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thiede C, Florek M, Bornhauser M et al (1999) Rapid quantification of mixed chimerism using multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat markers and fluorescence detection. Bone Marrow Transplant 23(10):1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1701779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nuckols JD, Rasheed BK, McGlennen RC et al (2000) Evaluation of an automated technique for assessment of marrow engraftment after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using a commercially available kit. Am J Clin Pathol 113(1):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1309/QP7P-J49V-8Q15-36MT

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rozi Hanisa from the National Blood Centre, Malaysia, for collecting the samples in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by ERGS Grant (ERGS/1/2012/SKK09/UKM/01/3), Ministry of Education, Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noor Hamidah Hussin.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the UKM Medical Centre, Malaysia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 657 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 12 kb)

ESM 3

(329  kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chia, W.C., Khoo, T.S., Abdul Wahid, S.F.S. et al. Multiplex STR panel for assessment of chimerism following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ann Hematol 98, 1279–1291 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03626-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03626-w

Keywords

Navigation