Log in

Multicenter phase II study of the CyclOBEAP (CHOP-like + etoposide and bleomycin) regimen for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to study the efficacy of the addition of etoposide and bleomycin to a [cyclophosphamide (CPA), doxorubicin (DXR), vincristine (VCR), and prednisone (PDN)] CHOP-like regimen for the treatment of aggressive lymphoma. The CyclOBEAP regimen was administered over a total period of 12 weeks. Doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2, was given every 2 weeks in combination with either cyclophosphamide, 1,000 mg/m2, (weeks 1, 5, 9) or etoposide, 70 mg/m2 qd ×4 (weeks 3, 7, 11). During the alternate weeks, non-myelosuppressive vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum, 2.0 mg/body), was given either with bleomycin, 10 mg/m2 (weeks 2, 6, 10), or alone (weeks 4,8,12). Prednisolone, 40 mg/m2, was administered daily for 14 days during weeks 1–2, 5–6, and 9–10. There were 121 eligible patients and median age of 51 years. A complete response was achieved in 106 patients (88%) and a partial response in 11 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 72% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 62%. When the patients were divided according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), the 5-year OS and PFS rates did not significantly differ among risk groups. When the patients with DLBCL were divided according to the IPI, the 5-year OS and PFS rates also did not significantly differ. World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 91 patients and thrombocytopenia in 13 patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed. The addition of etoposide and bleomycin to CHOP therapy may enhance the effect of CHOP therapy for aggressive lymphoma. We will perform a prospective study of CyclOBEAP regimen combined with rituximab and test its safety and efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 17:1244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Stat Soc Br 34:187–202

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elias L, Portlock CS, Rosenberg SA (1978) Combination chemotherapy of diffuse histiocytic lymphoma with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). Cancer 42:1705–1710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S et al (1993) Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 328:1002–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW (2001) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klimo P, Connors JM (1985) MACOP-B chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Ann Intern Med 102:596–602

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Linch DC, Smith P, Hancock BW et al (2000) A randomized British National Lymphoma Investigation trial of CHOP vs. a weekly multi-agent regimen (PACEBOM) in patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 11:87–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Longo DL, DeVita VT Jr, Duffey PL et al (1991) Superiority of Pro-MACE-CytaBOM over Pro-MACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse aggressive lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized study. J Clin Oncol 9:25–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Niitsu N, Okamoto M, Kuraishi Y, Nakamura S, Kodama F, Hirano M (2000) CyclOBEAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, prednisolone) regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a pilot study. The Adult Lymphoma Treatment Study Group (ALTSG). Eur J Haematol 65:188–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Classification Project (1982) National Cancer Institute sponsored study of classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usage. Cancer 49:2112–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M et al (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:634–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M et al (2004) Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood 104:626–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Ma D et al (2004) Randomized intergroup trial of first line treatment for patients ≤60 years with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (DLBCL) with a CHOP-like regimen with or without the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab-early stop** after the first interim analysis. J Clin Oncol (Abstracts) 22:#6500

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shipp MA: International non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma prognostic factors project (1993) A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilly H, Lepage E, Coiffier B et al (2003) Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 102:4284–4289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Travis LB, Curtis RE, Stovall M et al (1994) Risk of leukemia following treatment for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1450–1457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1:80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf M, Matthews JP, Stone J, Cooper IA, Robertson TI, Fox RM (1997) Long-term survival advantage of MACOP-B over CHOP in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Australian and New Zealand Lymphoma Group. Ann Oncol 8:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Nakamine, Dr. S. Nakamura, Dr. Oshima, Dr. Tamaru, and Dr. N. Nakamura for performing the pathological diagnosis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nozomi Niitsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niitsu, N., Okamoto, M., Aoki, S. et al. Multicenter phase II study of the CyclOBEAP (CHOP-like + etoposide and bleomycin) regimen for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma. Ann Hematol 85, 374–380 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-006-0080-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-006-0080-x

Keywords

Navigation