Log in

Arterial supply of the distal humerus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Distal humeral fractures are rare, but severe injuries, the treatment of which is often accompanied by serious complications and its outcome strongly depends on the quality of surgical therapy. Non-union is a common entity, compromising clinical results and requiring revision surgery. Osteonecrosis is an underestimated etiologic factor in the development of non-union. The present study aims to display the distribution patterns of the arterial vessels at the distal humerus, to correlate the displayed vessels with local nutrient foramina and to disclose an endangerment of these structures by common osteosynthetic implants.

Methods

Eight plastinated fresh frozen upper extremities were digitally analyzed regarding the vascular density of the cancellous bone, by calculating the ratio of area comprised by arterial vessels and the area comprised by cancellous bone on sagittal cuts of the distal humerus. Possible differences in the vascular density of the medial epicondylar region, the lateral epicondylar region and a watershed area between the epicondyles and distal to the supracondylar region were investigated. On the basis of 200 macerated humeri, the distribution pattern of cortical nutrient foramina and their anatomic relation to properly applied common distal humerus plates were documented.

Results

The data show a significantly higher density of vessels per cancellous bone in the epicondylar regions than in the watershed region (p < 0.000, median 0.148 vs. 0.103). The analysis of the nutrient foramina showed distinct distribution patterns with a single foramen over the medial epicondyle (55 specimens, 27.5 %) and an area of several foramina at the posterior part of the lateral epicondyle (200 of the specimens, 100 %). In almost every specimen, the application of the osteosynthetic implants led to an overlay over the investigated nutrient foramina.

Discussion

Osteonecrosis and non-union are severe complications in the surgical treatment of distal humeral fractures. The biology of the bone, especially the blood supply, has to be respected as much as possible during open procedures, to optimize bony healing. This has to be considered when performing periosteal strip** or applying osteosynthetic plates over the postero-lateral and medial epicondyle. The watershed area of the distal humerus has to be considered as being prone to minor arterial blood supply and thereby non-union is possible, if the arterial vessels coming from the epicondyles are destroyed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnander MW, Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto TM, Khaleel A (2008) A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22(5):332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll SE (1963) A study of the nutrient foramina of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45:176–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crock HV (ed) (1996) An atlas of vascular anatomy of the skeleton and spinal cord. Taylor and Francis Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haraldsson S (1957) The intra-osseous vasculature of the distal end of the humerus with special reference to capitulum; preliminary communication. Acta Orthop Scand 27(2):81–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi H, Doshi B, Malukar O (2011) A study of the nutrient foramina of the humeral diaphysis. Nat J Integrat Res Med 2(2):14–17

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kimball JP, Glowczewskie F, Wright TW (2007) Intraosseous blood supply to the distal humerus. J Hand Surg Am 32(5):642–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kizilkanat E, Boyan N, Ozsahin ET, Soames R, Oguz O (2007) Location, number and clinical significance of nutrient foramina in human long bones. Ann Anat 189(1):87–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, Lill H, Josten C, Schneider E et al (2004) A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma 18(5):286–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, Hessmann M, Kopf K, Goldhahn J et al (2005) Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S73–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kundel K, Braun W, Wieberneit J, Ruter A (1996) Intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Factors affecting functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 332:200–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laing PG (1956) The arterial supply of the adult humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 38(5):1105–1116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lob G, Burri C, Feil J (1984) Operative treatment of distal intra-articular humerus fractures; results of 412 follow-up cases (AO-collected statistics). Langenbecks Arch Chir 364:359–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murlimanju BV, Prashanth KU, Prabhu LV, Saralaya VV, Pai MM, Rai R (2011) Morphological and topographical anatomy of nutrient foramina in human upper limb long bones and their surgical importance. Rom J Morphol Embryol 52(3):859–862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Driscoll SW (2005) Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14((1 Suppl S)):S186–S194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Driscoll SW (2009) Parallel plate fixation of bicolumn distal humeral fractures. Instr Course Lect 58:521–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rath B, Notermans HP, Franzen J, Knifka J, Walpert J, Frank D et al (2009) The microvascular anatomy of the metatarsal bones: a plastination study. Surg Radiol Anat 31(4):271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubberdt A, Surke C, Fuchs T, Frerichmann U, Matuszewski L, Vieth V et al (2008) Preformed plate-fixation system for type AO 13C3 distal humerus fractures: clinical experiences and treatment results taking access into account. Unfallchirurg 111(5):308–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sodergard J, Sandelin J, Bostman O (1992) Mechanical failures of internal fixation in T and Y fractures of the distal humerus. J Trauma 33(5):687–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G (2008) Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res 26(6):778–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tien YC, Chen JC, Fu YC, Chih TT, Huang PJ, Wang GJ (2006) Supracondylar dome osteotomy for cubitus valgus deformity associated with a lateral condylar nonunion in children. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 1 Pt 2):191–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiggers JK, Ring D (2011) Osteonecrosis after open reduction and internal fixation of a bicolumnar fracture of the distal humerus: a report of four cases. J Hand Surg Am 36(1):89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamaguchi K, Sweet FA, Bindra R, Morrey BF, Gelberman RH (1997) The extraosseous and intraosseous arterial anatomy of the adult elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(11):1653–1662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zalavras CG, Vercillo MT, Jun BJ, Otarodifard K, Itamura JM, Lee TQ (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of parallel versus orthogonal plate fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(1):12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The biomechanical laboratory of the Department of Trauma Surgery is supported by a yearly grant by the “Medartis” Company, but not specifically for this study. K.J.B. and L.P.M. did not and will not receive any financial benefit in any form. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kilian Wegmann.

Additional information

Prof Koebke tragically deceased in February 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wegmann, K., Burkhart, K.J., Koslowsky, T. . et al. Arterial supply of the distal humerus. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 705–711 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1240-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1240-z

Keywords

Navigation