Log in

Surgical Management of Breast Capsular Contracture—A Multi-institutional Data Analysis of Risk Factors for Early Complications

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Capsular contracture (CC) is a common complication following implant-based breast surgery, often requiring surgical intervention. Yet, little is known about risk factors and outcomes following CC surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2008–2021) to identify female patients diagnosed with CC and treated surgically. Outcomes of interest included the incidence of surgical and medical complications at 30-days, reoperations, and readmissions. Confounder-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed to establish risk factors.

Results

5,057 patients with CC were identified (mean age: 55 ± 12 years and mean body mass index [BMI]: 26 ± 6 kg/m2). While 2,841 (65%) women underwent capsulectomy, capsulotomy was performed in 742 patients (15%). Implant removal and replacement were recorded in 1,160 (23%) and 315 (6.2%) cases, respectively. 319 (6.3%) patients experienced postoperative complications, with 155 (3.1%) reoperations and 99 (2.0%) readmissions. While surgical adverse events were recorded in 139 (2.7%) cases, 86 (1.7%) medical complications occurred during the 30 day follow-up. In multivariate analyses, increased BMI (OR: 1.04; p = 0.009), preoperative diagnosis of hypertension (OR: 1.48; p = 0.004), and inpatient setting (OR: 4.15; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of complication occurrence.

Conclusion

Based on 14 years of multi-institutional data, we calculated a net 30 day complication rate of 6.3% after the surgical treatment of CC. We identified higher BMI, hypertension, and inpatient setting as independent risk factors of postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons may wish to integrate these findings into their perioperative workflows, thus optimizing patient counseling and determining candidates’ eligibility for CC surgery.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgery (2020) Plastic surgery statistics. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics

  2. The Aesthetic Society (2022) The Aesthetic society releases annual statistics revelaing significant increase in face, breast, and body in 2021. Available from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-aesthetic-society-releases-annual-statistics-revealing-significant-increases-in-face-breast-and-body-in-2021-301522417.html#:~:text=Women%20accounted%20for%20approximately%2094,not%20replaced%20(%2B47%25

  3. Swanson E (2013) Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(1):30e–45e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swanson E (2023) Incision and capsular contracture risk: Is there a relationship in breast augmentation and augmentation/mastopexy? Ann Plast Surg 90(4):389–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):532–543

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wan D, Rohrich RJ (2016) Revisiting the management of capsular contracture in breast augmentation: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):826–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham B, McCue J (2009) Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(3):440–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammond DC et al (2012) Mentor contour profile gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(6):1381–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sobti N et al (2020) Evaluation of capsular contracture following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Sci Rep 10(1):1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachour Y (2021) Capsular contracture in breast implant surgery: Where are we now and where are we going? Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(3):1328–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prantl L et al (2007) Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hameed MR, Erlandson R, Rosen PP (1995) Capsular synovial-like hyperplasia around mammary implants similar to detritic synovitis a morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 19(4):433–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shin BH et al (2018) Silicone breast implant modification review: overcoming capsular contracture. Biomater Res 22:37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT (2008) Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol 20(2):86–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zingaretti N et al (2021) Surgical treatment of capsular contracture (CC): literature review and outcomes utilizing implants in revisionary surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(5):2036–2047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Berry MG, Cucchiara V, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation: part II–Adverse capsular contracture. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(12):2098–2107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Araco A et al (2009) Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1808–1819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf R et al (2015) Prevention of capsular contracture using leukotriene antagonists. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(5):592e–596e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otten A et al (2023) Capsulectomy versus capsulotomy to treat breast capsular contracture: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 11(21):22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Little G, Baker JL (1980) Jr Results of closed compression capsulotomy for treatment of contracted breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 65(1):30–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman BS (1972) Successful treatment of some fibrous envelope contractures around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 50(2):107–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision breast surgery: long-term outcomes and safety with neopectoral pockets. Aesthet Surg J 34(4):551–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hidalgo DA, Spector JA (2014) Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(4):567e–583e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Acellular dermal matrix for reoperative breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(5):932–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Namnoum JD, Moyer HR (2012) The role of acellular dermal matrix in the treatment of capsular contracture. Clin Plast Surg 39(2):127–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu J et al (2020) Efficacy of acellular dermal matrix in capsular contracture of implant-based breast reconstruction: a single-arm meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(3):735–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu C et al (2020) Transaxillary endoscopic approach to capsular contracture following previous breast augmentation: operative technique and clinical outcome. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lynch MP, Chung MT, Rinker BD (2015) A Comparison of dermal autograft and acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander breast reconstruction: long-term aesthetic outcomes and capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 74(Suppl 4):S214–S217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bresnick SD (2022) Correlation between capsular contracture rates and access incision location in vertical augmentation mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 150(5):1029–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee S et al (2023) Capsular contracture rate in augmentation mammoplasty with motiva breast implant insertion: a single-center experience in Korea. Aesthet Surg J 43(11):1248–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abi-Rafeh J et al (2021) Lack of evidence on complication profile of breast implant capsulectomy: a call to action for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 148(1):157e–158e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson RL et al (2022) Browse: a multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 48(1):73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McCarthy CM et al (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57s–66s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Knoedler S et al (2023) Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after rhinoplasty: a multi-Institutional ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Craniofac Surg 34(6):1722–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Knoedler S et al (2024) An ACS-NSQIP data analysis of 30-day outcomes following surgery for bell’s palsy. J Craniofac Surg 35(1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Knoedler S et al (2024) Surgical management of breast fat necrosis: multi-institutional data analysis of early outcomes and risk factors for complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 88:292–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Knoedler S et al (2024) Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 90:149–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Knoedler S et al (2023) Association of age with perioperative morbidity among patients undergoing surgical management of minor burns. Front Surg 10:1131293

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Abi-Rafeh J et al (2022) Complications of capsulectomies: an analysis of the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program database. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 4:ojac025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ali A et al (2022) Risk factors for capsular contracture in alloplastic reconstructive and augmentation mammaplasty: analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database. Aesthetic Plast Surg 47(5):1678–1682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Papaconstantinou A et al (2020) Nonsurgical treatment of capsular contracture: review of clinical studies. J Int Med Res 48(6):300060520927873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tehrani K (2018) What is capsular contracture and how can it be treated? American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/blog/what-is-capsular-contracture-and-how-can-it-be-treated

  43. Huang CK, Handel N (2010) Effects of singulair (montelukast) treatment for capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 30(3):404–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Swanson E (2016) Open capsulotomy: an effective but overlooked treatment for capsular contracture after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(10):e1096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chopra K et al (2015) Complications after primary breast augmentation: capsular contracture. Eplasty 15:ic40

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Afshari A et al (2022) Incidence and preoperative risk factors for major complications after capsulectomy: analysis of 3048 patients. Aesthet Surg J 42(6):603–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hung CC (2020) Endoscopic transaxillary capsulectomy with immediate reimplantation performed as a single-operator outpatient procedure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(12):2225–2231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Knoedler S et al (2022) Perioperative outcomes and risk profile of 4,730 cosmetic breast surgery cases in academic institutions: An ACS-NSQIP analysis. Aesthet Surg J 43(4):433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. ZinoAlarki SMK, Mortada H, Abdullah IA, Alkhalidi H, Alrehaili M et al (2022) Early onset of capsular contracture after breast augmentation with implant: report of two cases & review of literature. Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg 9:1151–1157

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zeplin PH, Corduff N (2015) Influence of patient age on capsular contracture after aesthetic breast augmentation. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23(2):67–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Henriksen TF et al (2003) Incidence and severity of short-term complications after breast augmentation: results from a nationwide breast implant registry. Ann Plast Surg 51(6):531–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Maher JL et al (2010) Breast augmentation: a geographical comparison. Can J Plast Surg 18(4):e44–e46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Knoedler S et al (2023) The significance of timing in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: An ACS-NSQIP analysis. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg 89:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pagani A, Aitzetmüller MM, Larcher L (2022) A forgotten entity following breast implant contracture: Does baker need a change? Arch Plast Surg 49(3):360–364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Torres-Zuniga S, Ziade NV, Zambrano JC (2022) Ultrasound criteria and baker scale for breast implant capsular contracture diagnosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(10):e4582

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Gossner J (2017) Sonography in capsular contracture after breast augmentation: value of established criteria, new techniques and directions for research. J Ultrasound 20(1):87–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Calobrace MB et al (2018) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:20s–28s

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. de Kerckhove M, Iwahira Y (2020) Risk factors for capsular contracture: aretrospective study in immediate reconstruction versus delayed reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(5):e2864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bachour Y et al (2018) Risk factors for develo** capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(9):e29–e48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Vaccari S et al (2023) Implant-based breast reconstruction: impact of body mass index on postoperative complications and aesthetic results: a 5-year. Single Cent Study Aesthet Surg J 43:12

    Google Scholar 

  61. McGuire P, Reisman NR, Murphy DK (2017) Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture, malposition, and late seroma in subjects receiving natrelle 410 form-stable silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Largent JA et al (2013) Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 33(4):529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Srinivasa DR et al (2020) Obesity and breast reconstruction: complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicentre, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):481e–490e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Knoedler S et al (2023) The surgical patient of yesterday, today, and tomorrow-a time-trend analysis based on a cohort of 8.7 million surgical patients. Int J Surg 109(9):2631–2640

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gill PS et al (2004) A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(4):1153–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fischer JP et al (2013) Peri-operative risk factors associated with early tissue expander (TE) loss following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR): a review of 9305 patients from the 2005–2010 ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(11):1504–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Xue DQ et al (2012) Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(5):375–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Park JW et al (2021) Effects of antihypertensive drugs on surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a nationwide population-based claim study. Gland Surg 10(7):2130–2139

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Kurosaka M et al (2009) Reduced angiogenesis and delay in wound healing in angiotensin II type 1a receptor-deficient mice. Biomed Pharmacother 63(9):627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Takeda H et al (2004) Effects of angiotensin II receptor signaling during skin wound healing. Am J Pathol 165(5):1653–1662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Leyngold MM et al (2012) Contributing variables to post mastectomy tissue expander infection. Breast J 18(4):351–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lu Y et al (2020) Inpatient admission following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with higher postoperative complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(8):2486–2493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Khazi ZM et al (2021) Inpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with higher postoperative complications compared with same-day discharge: a matched cohort analysis. Arthroscopy 37(1):42–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Virden CP et al (2020) Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(4):1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Schoenfelder SM et al (2010) Success through diversity—how Staphylococcus epidermidis establishes as a nosocomial pathogen. Int J Med Microbiol 300(6):380–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Stevenson P, Marguet M, Regulski M (2023) Biofilm and hospital-acquired infections in older adults. Crit Care Nurs Clin N Am 35(4):375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Galdiero M et al (2018) Microbial evaluation in capsular contracture of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):23–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Shiloach M et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no funding for data collection or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no relevant financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kauke-Navarro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

IRB Protocol ID: 2000035387, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knoedler, S., Knoedler, L., Boroumand, S. et al. Surgical Management of Breast Capsular Contracture—A Multi-institutional Data Analysis of Risk Factors for Early Complications. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04203-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04203-x

Keywords

Navigation