Log in

Prevention of Breast Implant Displacement Using the Acellular Dermal Matrix Garter Belt

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since the issue of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, smooth breast implants tend to be the more preferred option in implant-based breast reconstructions, compared to its use previously. The most unfavorable aspect of smooth implants is lateral and inferior displacements, which are more common in patients who undergo breast reconstruction compared to augmentation mammoplasty. Hence, we introduce a prevention method for implant displacement using an acellular dermal matrix garter belt.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of patients who had undergone implant-based breast reconstruction between April 2019 and December 2020. Some patients who have highly possibility of implant displacement, had undergone the application of an ADM garter belt to prevent lateral or superior displacement. Implant displacement was assessed before and at least 6 months postoperatively.

Results

A total of 155 IBR cases were recorded. ADM garter belts were applied in 27 patients (17.4%) who had a high tendency of implant displacement for several reasons, which could be classified into two categories: wide breast pocket (56%) and tight inferomedial breast pocket (44%). The intraoperative average distance of lateral slip** on patients’ reconstructed breasts from the chest wall midline in supine position was 3.02 ± 0.81 cm and corrected to1.54 ± 0.69 cm at least 6 months postoperative follow-up.

Conclusions

We utilized an ADM strap as an internalized garter belt to minimize implant displacement. This ADM garter belt combined with capsuloplasty might be an effective way to prevent the displacement of smooth implants in the patients with a greater risk of implant displacement.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swanson E (2020) The food and drug administration bans Biocell textured breast implants: lessons for plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 84:343–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Food U, Administration D. The FDA requests Allergan voluntarily recall Natrelle BIOCELL textured breast implants and tissue expanders from the market to protect patients: FDA safety communication. 2019

  3. Zingaretti N, Galvano F, Vittorini P et al (2019) Smooth Prosthesis: our experience and current state of art in the use of smooth sub-muscular silicone gel breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43:1454–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buonomo OC, Morando L, Materazzo M et al (2020) Comparison of round smooth and shaped micro-textured implants in terms of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast reconstruction: a single-centre prospective study. Updat Surg 72:537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedén P, Montemurro P, Adams W et al (2015) Anatomical and round breast implants: how to select and indications for use. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calobrace MB, Schwartz MR, Zeidler KR et al (2017) Long-term safety of textured and smooth breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 38:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeCoster RC, Lynch EB, Bonaroti AR et al (2021) Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: defining future research priorities. Clin Plast Surg 48:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown MH, Somogyi RB, Aggarwal S (2016) Secondary breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:119e–135e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shestak KC (2011) Acellular dermal matrix inlays to correct significant implant malposition in patients with compromised local tissues. Aesthet Surg J 31:85s–94s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fracol M, Qiu CS, Chiu WK et al (2020) Lateral and Inferior Implant Malposition In Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: Incidence And Risk Factors. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8:e2752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chasan PE (2005) Breast capsulorrhaphy revisited: a simple technique for complex problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:296–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chasan PE, Francis CS (2008) Capsulorrhaphy for revisionary breast surgery. Aesthet Surg J 28:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson JD, Oven SD, Skalicky RJ (2018) A novel technique for treatment of recurrent capsular contracture using acellular dermal matrix in aesthetic revisional breast surgery. Am J Cosmet Surg 36:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21:81–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55:232–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E et al (2008) Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:418–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Namnoum J, Moyer H (2012) The role of acellular dermal matrix in the treatment of capsular contracture. Clin Plast Surg 39:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Woo A, Harless C, Jacobson SR (2017) Revisiting an old place: single-surgeon experience on post-mastectomy subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction. Breast J 23:545–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW et al (2019) Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 46:550–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arquero P, Zanata F, Ferreira L et al (2015) Capsular weakness around breast implant: a non-recognized complication. World J Plast Surg 4:168–174

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate Medical Art Studio (Sun-Joo Kim) for the preparation of the excellent illustrations and graphic design.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Euna Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors confirm that there are no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was conducted following the approval of the CHA University Bundang CHA Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 2021-07-059).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, H.J., Jeong, S.H., Yang, J.Y. et al. Prevention of Breast Implant Displacement Using the Acellular Dermal Matrix Garter Belt. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 1042–1049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02665-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02665-x

Keywords

Navigation