Log in

The posterior crescent sign on MRI and MR arthrography: is it a marker of hip dysplasia and instability?

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of the ‘posterior crescent sign’ in symptomatic patients referred for MRI/MR arthrogram of the hip and identify any correlation with imaging features of joint pathology.

Materials and methods

Retrospective imaging assessment of a cohort of 1462 hips, from 1380 included MR examinations (82 bilateral) retrieved from a search of all examinations in patients 16–50 years old from June 2018 to June 2021, with median age 45.8 years (range 17.8–50.0) and 936 hips (64%) in women. Radiographic and MR findings related to hip dysplasia, femoroacetabular im**ement and osteoarthritis were assessed.

Results

Fifty-one hips (3.5%) were positive for the posterior crescent sign, median age of 45.8 years (range 17.8–50.0) and 29 (58%) in women. Radiographic findings included the following: mean lateral centre edge angle (LCEA) 22.2° (± 7.8°) with LCEA < 20° in 15 (31%) and LCEA 20–25° in 17 (35%) and mean acetabular index (AI) of 13.1° (± 5.8°) with AI > 13° in 22 (45%). MR findings included the following: mean anterior acetabular sector angle (AASA) 54.3° (± 9.8°), mean posterior acetabular sector angle (PASA) 92.7° (± 7.0°), labral tear at 3–4 o’clock in 20 (39%), high-grade acetabular chondral loss in 42 (83%) and ligamentum teres abnormality in 20 (39%).

Conclusion

The posterior crescent sign occurs in 3.5% of symptomatic young and middle-aged adults on MR. It is associated with overt and borderline hip dysplasia and other findings of hip instability. It is also associated with osteoarthritis in some cases and should be interpreted with caution in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolia I, Chahla J, Locks R, Briggs K, Philippon MJ. Microinstability of the hip: a previously unrecognized pathology. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016;6:354–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Safran MR, Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Vaughn ZD, Lindsey DP, et al. In vitro analysis of peri-articular soft tissues passive constraining effect on hip kinematics and joint stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1655–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charbonnier C, Kolo FC, Duthon VB, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Menetrey J. Assessment of congruence and im**ement of the hip joint in professional ballet dancers: a motion capture study. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:557–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyatt MC, Beck M. The management of the painful borderline dysplastic hip. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018;5:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Safran MR. Microinstability of the hip – gaining acceptance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalisvaart MM, Safran MR. Microinstability of the hip – it does exist: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2:123–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dangin A, Tardy N, Wettstein M, May O, Bonin N. Microinstability of the hip: a review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:S301–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodward RM, Philippon MJ. Persistent or recurrent symptoms after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular im**ement: a review of imaging findings. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63:15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shibata KR, Matsuda S, Safran MR. Is there a distinct pattern to the acetabular labrum and articular cartilage damage in the non-dysplastic hip with instability? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:84–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Safran MR, Murray IR, Andrade AJ, Aoki SK, Ayeni OR, Balakumar J, et al. Criteria for the operating room confirmation of the diagnosis of hip instability: the results of an international expert consensus conference. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2022;38:2837–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen D, Jean P-O, Patel M, Aravinthan N, Simunovic N, Duong A, et al. Hip microinstability diagnosis and management: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06976-7.

  12. Akiyama K, Sakai T, Koyhanagi J, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Evaluation of translation in the normal and dysplastic hip using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and voxel-based registration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:700–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burke CJ, Walter WR, Gyftopoulos S, Pham H, Baron S, Gonzalez-Lomas G, et al. Real-time assessment of femoroacetabular motion using radial gradient echo magnetic resonance arthrography at 3 Tesla in routine clinical practice: a pilot study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2019;35:2366–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beltran LS, Rosenberg ZS, Mayo JD, Diaz de Tuesta M, Martin O, Neto LP, et al. Imaging evaluation of developmental hip dysplasia in the young adult. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:1077–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haefeli PC, Steppacher SD, Babst D, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. An increased iliocapsularis-to-rectus-femoris ratio is suggestive for instability in borderline hips. Clin Orthop. 2015;473:3725–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mascarenhas VV, Ayeni OR, Egund N, Jurik AG, Caetano A, Castro M, et al. Imaging methodology for hip preservation: techniques, parameters, and thresholds. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019;23:197–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad KA, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:115–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chadayammuri V, Garabekyan T, Bedi A, Pascual-Garrido C, Rhodes J, O’Hara J, et al. Passive hip range of motion predicts femoral torsion and acetabular version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baker KB, Vesey RM, Clark B, Billington K, Woodward RM. Assessment of the iliocapsularis muscle on magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;66:920–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zurmühle CA, Kuner V, McInnes J, Pfluger DH, Beck M. The crescent sign – a predictor of hip instability in magnetic resonance arthrography. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021;8:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonoda K, Hara T. “Anterior-shift sign”: a novel MRI finding of adult hip dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:1763–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkin GP, Ibrahim MM, Smit KM, Beaulé PE. A contemporary definition of hip dysplasia and structural instability: toward a comprehensive classification for acetabular dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:S20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nepple JJ, Wells J, Ross JR, Bedi A, Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC. Three patterns of acetabular deficiency are common in young adult patients with acetabular dysplasia. Clin Orthop. 2017;475:1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tannast M, Fritsch S, Zheng G, Sibenrock KA, Steppacher SD. Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt? Clin Orthop. 2015;473:1255–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Fine JP. Classification and localization of acetabular labral tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Suter A, Dietrich TJ, Maier M, Dora C, Pfirrmann CW. MR findings associated with positive distraction of the hip joint achieved by axial traction. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris JD. Hypermobile hip syndrome. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2019;27:101–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barlow B. Iliopsoas fractional lengthening: treating a disease or a symptom? Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2019;35:1441–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cerezal L, Kassarjian A, Canga A, Dobado MC, Montero JA, Llopis E, et al. Anatomy, biomechanics, imaging, and management of ligamentum teres injuries. Radiographics. 2010;30:1637–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perumal V, Woodley SJ, Nicholson HD, Brick MJ, Bacon CJ. Ligamentum teres lesions are associated with poorer patient outcomes in a large primary hip arthroscopy cohort of 1,935 patients. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4:e1363–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Woodward RM, Vesey RM, Bacon CJ, White SG, Brick MJ, Blankenbaker DG. Microinstability of the hip: a systemic review of the imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:1903–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayes S, Ferris A-R, Smith P, Garnham A, Cook J. Atraumatic tears of the ligamentum teres are more frequent in professional ballet dancers than a sporting population. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45:959–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Munoz del Rio A. Imaging appearance of the normal and partially torn ligamentum teres on hip MR athrography. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:1093–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shakoor D, Farahani SJ, Hafezi-Nejad N, Johnson A, Vaidya D, Khanuja HS, et al. Lesions of ligamentum teres: diagnostic performance of MRI and MR arthrography – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:W52-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Field RE, Rajakulendran K. The labro-acetabular complex. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. MacDonald.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacDonald, A.A., Blankenbaker, D.G., Brick, M.J. et al. The posterior crescent sign on MRI and MR arthrography: is it a marker of hip dysplasia and instability?. Skeletal Radiol 52, 1127–1135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04248-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04248-6

Keywords

Navigation