Log in

MR arthrogram of the postoperative glenoid labrum: normal postoperative appearance versus recurrent tears

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to describe the MR arthrogram appearance of the postoperative glenoid labrum and to describe the features consistent with recurrent tear.

Materials and Methods

We identified 30 patients who had undergone glenoid labral repair, had a subsequent MR arthrogram of his or her shoulder, and went on to repeat shoulder arthroscopy. Each MR arthrogram was reviewed blindly, and the glenoid labrum was described as normal, irregular, or torn. Additional findings recorded included the presence or absence of a paralabral cyst and suture anchors in the glenoid. The operative report was also reviewed for each patient to determine the status of the labrum at arthroscopy.

Results

Following consensus review, 18/30 MRIs were felt to demonstrate recurrent glenoid labral tear, 11/30 showed an irregular labrum, and 1/30 was called normal. The radiology impression regarding the presence or absence of a recurrent glenoid labral tear agreed with the operative report in 24/30 (80%) cases, and was discrepant in six. This equals 83.3% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity of MR arthrogram in the diagnosis of recurrent labral tear in this study. A paralabral cyst was present in 3/30 (10%) cases, all three of which were torn.

Conclusions

MR arthrogram findings of signal equal to gadolinium or fluid within or underlying the glenoid labrum and markedly diminutive or absent labrum were the most useful features to diagnose recurrent tear. Some signal underlying the labrum, which is confined to the anterosuperior quadrant, may be normal. The secondary finding of a paralabral cyst was also highly sensitive for recurrent tear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohana-Borges AV, Chung CB, Resnick D. MR imaging and MR arthrography of the postoperative shoulder: spectrum of normal and abnormal findings. Radiographics. 2004;24(1):69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park YH, Lee JY, Moon SH, et al. MR arthrography of the labral capsular ligamentous complex in the shoulder: imaging variations and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(3):667–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson G, Ho Y, Finlay K, Friedman L, Harish S. Normal anatomy and common labral lesions at MR arthrography of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(10):805–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zlatkin MB. MRI of the postoperative shoulder. Skelet Radiol. 2002;31(2):63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandnani VP, Yeager TD, DeBerardino T, et al. Glenoid labral tears: prospective evaluation with MRI imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161(6):1229–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1994;190(3):645–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Probyn LJ, White LM, Salonen DC, Tomlinson G, Boynton EL. Recurrent symptoms after shoulder instability repair: direct MR arthrographic assessment--correlation with second-look surgical evaluation. Radiology. 2007;245(3):814–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner SC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Fenlin JM Jr, Bartolozzi AR. Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury--initial findings. Radiology. 2002;222(1):196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bancroft LW, Wasyliw C, Pettis C, Farley T. Postoperative shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2012;20(2):313–25. xi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beltran LS, Bencardino JT, Steinbach LS. Postoperative MRI of the shoulder. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40(6):1280–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce JL, Nacey NC, Jones S, et al. Postoperative shoulder imaging: rotator cuff, labrum, and biceps tendon. Radiographics. 2016;36:1648–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS. MR arthrographic appearance of the postoperative acetabular labrum in patients with suspected recurrent labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(6):W1118–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardello P, Gigli C, Ricci A, Chiatti L, Voglino N, Pofi E. Retears of postoperative knee meniscus: findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) by using low and high field magnets. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38(2):149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gobexie R, Zurakowski D, Lavery K, Millett PJ, Cole BJ, Warner JJ. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP tears using the Snyder classification. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1373–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christin A. Tiegs-Heiden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiegs-Heiden, C.A., Rhodes, N.G., Collins, M.S. et al. MR arthrogram of the postoperative glenoid labrum: normal postoperative appearance versus recurrent tears. Skeletal Radiol 47, 1475–1481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2947-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2947-z

Keywords

Navigation