Abstract
This study examines shelter effect against the wind by using wind fence with various porosities and distance. The shelter effect of wind fence was investigated by a wind tunnel test. Flow characteristics of velocities and turbulences behind wind fence were measured using a hot-wire anemometer. This was done by varying the porosity by 0, 20, and 40% of the wind fence. The wind fence distance ranged from 1H to 9H. In addition, the overall characterization of the wind fence was investigated by measuring a total of 28 points on the wind fence, which forms a lattice structure on it with 7 points in the lateral direction and 4 points in the vertical direction. The results indicate that the degree of the turbulence is lowered and the velocity of the wind is decreased when porosity of 40% is used at a distance of 4H–7H. The effectiveness of the wind fence depends on the porosity and distance. Porosity of 20% proved to be effective for the protection area of 1H–3H, while that of 40% was effective for the protection area of 4H–6H.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig8a_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig8b_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig8c_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00254-008-1219-y/MediaObjects/254_2008_1219_Fig12_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Durst F, Rastogi AK (1979) Turbulent flow over two-dimensional fences, turbulence shear flow 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 219–231
Judd MJ, Raupach MR, Fininigan JJ (1996) A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple wind break, part I: velocity fields. Bound Layer Meteorol 80:127–165
Lee SJ, Kim HB (1999) Laboratory measurements of velocity and turbulence filed behind porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 80:311–326
Park CW, Lee SJ (2001) The effects of bottom gap and non-uniform porosity in a wind fence on the surface pressure of a triangular prism located behind the fence. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 89:1137–1154
Perera MDAES (1981) Shelter behind two-dimensional solid and porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 8:93–180
Plate EJ (1971) The aerodynamic of shelter belts. Agric Meteorol 8:203–222
Raine JK, Stevenson DC (1977) Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 2:159–180
Ranga RKG, Garde RJ, Singh SK, Singth N (1988) Experimental study on characteristics of flow past porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 29:155–163
Subhas C, Yaragal HS, Govinda R, Murthy KK (1997) An experimental investigation of flow fields downstream of solid and porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynam 66:127–140
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) through the National Research Lab. Program funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology [No. R0A-2005-000-10080-0 (2007)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
You, KP., Kim, YM. Effect of protection against wind according to the variation porosity of wind fence. Environ Geol 56, 1193–1203 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1219-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1219-y