Log in

Comparative functional analysis of the urinary tract microbiome for individuals with or without calcium oxalate calculi

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals with urinary stone disease (USD) exhibit dysbiosis in the urinary tract and the loss of Lactobacillus that promote urinary tract health. However, the microbial metabolic functions that differentiate individuals with USD from healthy individuals are unknown. The objective of the current study was to determine the microbial functions across prokaryotic, viral, fungal, and protozoan domains that are associated with calcium oxalate (CaOx) stone formers through comparative shotgun metagenomics of midstream, voided urine samples for a small number of patients (n = 5 CaOx stone formers, n = 5 healthy controls). Results revealed that CaOx stone formers had reduced levels of genes associated with oxalate metabolism, as well as transmembrane transport, proteolysis, and oxidation–reduction processes. From 17 draft genomes extracted from the data and > 42,000 full length reference genomes, genes enriched in the Control group mapped overwhelming to Lactobacillus crispatus and those associated with CaOx mapped to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia sp. The microbial functions that differentiated the clinical cohorts are associated with known mechanisms of stone formation. While the prokaryotes most differentiated the CaOx and Control groups, a diverse, trans-domain microbiome was apparent. While our sample numbers were small, results corroborate previous studies and suggest specific microbial metabolic pathways in the urinary tract that modulate stone formation. Future studies that target these metabolic pathways as well as the influence of viruses, fungi, and protozoa on urinary tract physiology is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw sequence reads and metadata are available at the Sequence Read Archive under BioProject # PRJNA718167. Constructed genomes are available under BioProject #PRJNA717274.

Abbreviations

USD:

Urinary stone disease

CaOx:

Calcium oxalate

References

  1. Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR (2017) Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investigative and clinical urology 58:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR, Project UDiA (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68:1808–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Batagello CM, Manoj; Miller, Aaron W. (2018) Urolithiasis: a case of missing microbes? J Endourol 32(11):995–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zampini A, Nguyen AH, Rose E, Monga M, Miller AW (2019) Defining dysbiosis in patients with urolithiasis. Sci Rep 9:5425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tasian GE, Thomas J, Goldfarb David S, Copelovitch L, Gerber Jeffrey S, Qufei Wu, Denburg Michelle R (2018) Oral antibiotic exposure and kidney stone disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 29(6):1731–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraro PM, Curhan GC, Gambaro G, Taylor EN (2019) Antibiotic use and risk of incident kidney stones in female nurses. Am J Kidney Dis 74:736–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dornbier RA, Bajic P, Van Kuiken M et al (2019) The microbiome of calcium-based urinary stones. Urolithiasis. 48(3):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sivaguru M, Saw JJ, Williams JC et al (2018) Geobiology reveals how human kidney stones dissolve in vivo. Sci Rep 8:13731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolfe AJ, Brubaker L (2015) “Sterile urine” and the presence of bacteria. Eur Urol 68:173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu F, Zhang N, Jiang P et al (2020) Characteristics of the urinary microbiome in kidney stone patients with hypertension. J Transl Med 18:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. **e J, Huang J-s, Huang X-j et al (2020) Profiling the urinary microbiome in men with calcium-based kidney stones. BMC Microbiol 20:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rani A, Ranjan R, McGee HS et al (2017) Urinary microbiome of kidney transplant patients reveals dysbiosis with potential for antibiotic resistance. Transl Res 181:59–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Garretto A, Thomas-White K, Wolfe AJ, Putonti C (2018) Detecting viral genomes in the female urinary microbiome. J Gen Virol 99:1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bushnell B, Rood J, Singer E (2017) BBMerge–accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE 12:e0185056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li H (2013) Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. 1–3. ar**v preprint ar**v:1303.3997.

  16. Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA (2017) metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:824–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seemann T (2014) Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W (2012) CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:3150–3152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. (2010) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.17–4. http://cran.r-project. org. Acesso em. 23:2010.

  21. Miller IJ, Rees ER, Ross J et al (2019) Autometa: automated extraction of microbial genomes from individual shotgun metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:e57–e57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen K-T, Liu C-L, Huang S-H et al (2018) CSAR: a contig scaffolding tool using algebraic rearrangements. Bioinformatics 34:109–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I (2009) ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Asnicar F, Thomas AM, Beghini F et al (2020) Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat Commun 11:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holmes RP, Assimos DG (2004) The impact of dietary oxalate on kidney stone formation. Urol Res 32:311–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang J, McFann K, Chonchol M (2012) Dietary zinc intake and kidney stone formation: evaluation of NHANES III. Am J Nephrol 36:549–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chi T, Kim MS, Lang S et al (2015) A Drosophila model identifies a critical role for zinc in mineralization for kidney stone disease. PLoS ONE 10:e0124150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reddy ST, Wang C-Y, Sakhaee K, Brinkley L, Pak CY (2002) Effect of low-carbohydrate high-protein diets on acid-base balance, stone-forming propensity, and calcium metabolism. Am J Kidney Dis 40:265–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan SR (2013) Reactive oxygen species as the molecular modulators of calcium oxalate kidney stone formation: evidence from clinical and experimental investigations. J Urol 189:803–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan SR (2014) Reactive oxygen species, inflammation and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Transl Androl Urol 3:256

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Grin PM, Kowalewska PM, Alhazzan W, Fox-Robichaud AE (2013) Lactobacillus for preventing recurrent urinary tract infections in women: meta-analysis. Can J Urol 20:6607–6614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nerurkar A, Solanky P, Naik SS (2012) Bacterial pathogens in urinary tract infection and antibiotic susceptibility pattern. J Pharm Biomed Sci 21:1–3.

  33. Atilla Aridoğan I, Ilkit M, Izol V, Ates A (2005) Malassezia and Candida colonisation on glans penis of circumcised men. Mycoses 48:352–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fonseca F, Lanna M, Campos M et al (1998) Morphological and molecular characterization of the poxvirus BeAn 58058. Adv Virol 143:1171–1186

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Goolam Mahomed T, Peters R, Allam M et al (2021) Lung microbiome of stable and exacerbated COPD patients in Tshwane South Africa. Sci Rep 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van de Vossenberg J, Hoiting Y, Kamara AK et al (2021) Double-Stranded DNA virus assemblages in groundwater in three informal urban settlements in sub-Saharan Africa differ from each other. ACS ES&T Water 1:1992–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mollerup S, Mikkelsen LH, Hansen AJ, Heegaard S (2019) High-throughput sequencing reveals no viral pathogens in eight cases of ocular adnexal extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Exp Eye Res 185:107677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Isaac R, Reis FCG, Ying W, Olefsky JM (2021) Exosomes as mediators of intercellular crosstalk in metabolism. Cell Metab 33:1744–1762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

NK was supported in part by the Urology Care Foundation Research Scholar Award Program and Endourological Society/Raju Thomas M.D. Award. Funding was also provided by NIH/NIDDK Grant 1R01DK121689-01A1 to AM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron W. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interests to report.

Ethics approval

The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Cleveland Clinic (IRB# 16-643).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1 Within group variance in Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of the metagenome profile.

Fig. S2 Significantly different microbial genes mapped to >42,000 reference genomes.

Table S1 Number of taxa in the urinary tract that differentiated CaOx patients from controls.

240_2022_1314_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx

Table S2 Microbial genes significantly different between the CaOx and Controls. Listed are the log2 fold change, p value and adjusted p value, group enriched, which genome the genes mapped to either the de novo or reference genomes, and the complete Gene Ontology annotation of the genes.

Supplementary file5 (XLSX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kachroo, N., Monga, M. & Miller, A.W. Comparative functional analysis of the urinary tract microbiome for individuals with or without calcium oxalate calculi. Urolithiasis 50, 303–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01314-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01314-5

Keywords

Navigation