Log in

Effect of electrical and chemical (activation versus inactivation) stimulation of the infralimbic division of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats with chronic neuropathic pain

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP) represents a complex disorder with sensory, cognitive, and emotional symptoms. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) takes critical regulatory roles and may change functionally and morphologically during chronic NP. There needs to be a complete understanding of the neurophysiological and psychopharmacological bases of the NP phenomenon. This study aimed to investigate the participation of the infralimbic division (IFL) of the mPFC in chronic NP, as well as the role of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAr) in the elaboration of chronic NP. Male Wistar rats were submitted to the von Frey and acetone tests to assess mechanical and cold allodynia after 21 days of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve or Sham-procedure (“false operated”). Electrical neurostimulation of the IFL/mPFC was performed by low-frequency stimuli (20 μA, 100 Hz) applied for 15 s by deep brain stimulation (DBS) device 21 days after CCI. Either cobalt chloride (CoCl2 at 1.0 mM/200 nL), NMDAr agonist (at 0.25, 1.0, and 2.0 nmol/200 nL) or physiological saline (200 nL) was administered into the IFL/mPFC. CoCl2 administration in the IFL cortex did not alter either mechanical or cold allodynia. DBS stimulation of the IFL cortex decreased mechanical allodynia in CCI rats. Chemical stimulation of the IFL cortex by an NMDA agonist (at 2.0 nmol) decreased mechanical allodynia. NMDA at any dose (0.25, 1.0, and 2.0 nmol) reduced the flicking/licking duration in the cold test. These findings suggest that the IFL/mPFC and the NMDAr of the neocortex are involved in attenuating chronic NP in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, R.L. de Freitas, upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Mr. Paulo Castilho, Ms. Ariane Santana, Mr. Daoud Hibrahim Elias Filho, and Ms. Maria Rossato for their expert technical assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (Research Grant 2013/12916-0 and Multi-user Equipment Grant 2014/11869-0) and Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (CNPq) (Grant 427397/2018-9). Neither of these funding sources had any role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, report writing, or decision to submit the paper for publication. R L de Freitas was supported by FAPESP (Scientific Initiation Scholarship Grant 2001/03752-6, M.Sc. fellowship grant 2003/05256-1, post-doctoral fellowship Grant 2009/17258-5, and researcher fellowship grant 2014/07902-2) and CAPES (Sc.D. fellowship Grant 001). FAPESP also supported Priscila de Medeiros (Sc.D. fellowship Grant 2012/25167–2; post-doctoral fellowship grant 2017/13560-5). CNPq supported Priscila Medeiros (post-doctoral fellowship Grant 150806/2021-3). CAPES supported Renata C. Martins Pereira (M.Sc. fellowship Grant 88887.474986/2020-00). Neither of these funding sources had any role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, report writing, or decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TLM-P, PM and RCMP performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and designed the figures; TLM-P, RCMP and RLF wrote the manuscript. LS, CRL-P, HRM and NCC analyzed and interpreted the data and revised the final manuscript. Renato Leonardo de Freitas designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato Leonardo de Freitas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest concerning the work presented herein.

Additional information

Communicated by Francesco Lacquaniti.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLS 69 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moura-Pacheco, T.L., Martins-Pereira, R.C., Medeiros, P. et al. Effect of electrical and chemical (activation versus inactivation) stimulation of the infralimbic division of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats with chronic neuropathic pain. Exp Brain Res 241, 2591–2604 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06657-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06657-y

Keywords

Navigation