Log in

Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies examining dual adaptation to opposing novel environments have yielded contradictory results, with previous evidence supporting both successful dual adaptation and interference leading to poorer adaptive performance. Whether or not interference is observed during dual adaptation appears to be dependent on the method used to allow the performer of the task to distinguish between two novel environments. This experiment tested if colour cues, a separation in workspace, and presentation schedule, could be used to distinguish between two opposing visuomotor rotations and enable dual adaptation. Through the use of a purpose designed manipulandum, each visuomotor rotation was either presented in the same region of workspace and associated with colour cues (Group 1), different regions of workspace in addition to colour cues (Groups 2 and 3) or different regions of workspace only (Groups 4 and 5). We also assessed the effectiveness of the workspace separation with both randomised and alternating presentation schedules (Groups 4 and 5). The results indicated that colour cues were not effective at enabling dual adaptation when each of the visuomotor rotations was associated with the same region of workspace. When associated with different regions of workspace, however, dual adaptation to the opposing rotations was successful regardless of whether colour cues were present or the type of presentation schedule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bays P, Flanagan R, Wolpert DM (2005) Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory. Exp Brain Res 163:400–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Worringham C, Thomas M (2005) Concurrent adaptations of left and right arms to opposite visual distortions. Exp Brain Res 162:513–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial map**s suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:493–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi F, Bizzi E (1996) Motor leaning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3843–3846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghahramani Z, Wolpert D (1997) Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386:392–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang EJ, Donchin O, Smith M, Shadmehr R (2003) A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol 1:209–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi F (2002) Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143:520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor rotations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2004) Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7:111–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shemmell J, Forner M, Tresilian JR, Riek S, Barry BK, Carson RG (2005) Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target acquisition task: isometric torque production. J Neurophysiol 94:3046–3057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Young DE, Proteau L (1993) Determining movement onsets from temporal series. J Mot Behav 25:97–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M (2003) Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force-fields. Neurosci Res 46:319–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Sainburg RL (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25:4024–4030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore V, Tong C, Flanagan JR (2002) Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:447–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel G. Woolley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woolley, D.G., Tresilian, J.R., Carson, R.G. et al. Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace. Exp Brain Res 179, 155–165 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0778-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0778-y

Keywords

Navigation