Log in

Benchmarks of graph invariants for hydrogen-bond networks in water clusters of different topology

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diversity of the various forms of water stems from systems of hydrogen bonds. Cooperative behaviour of hydrogen-bond networks gives rise to unique properties of water systems. A number of approaches to understand and model the collective behaviour of hydrogen bonds and predict their properties on the basis of a small number of calculations have been put forward. Among them, the concept of graph invariants provides most general descriptors for hydrogen-bond networks, which are routinely used to predict properties of water systems. In the present work, we examine the formalism of graph invariants and propose its modification which may be beneficial for water structures with defects. To benchmark graph invariants, we carried out quantum-chemical calculations of more than \(10^7\) water clusters with different hydrogen-bond configurations. The quality of the approximation is studied as a function of the type of graph invariant and its order. The results demonstrate that the method is applicable only to cage-like structures without significant strains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoepfner V, Deringer VL, Dronskowski R (2012) Accurate hydrogen positions in organic crystals: assessing a quantum-chemical aide. Cryst Growth Des 12:1014–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoepfner V, Deringer VL, Dronskowski R (2012) Hydrogen-bonding networks from first principles: exploring the guanidine crystal. J Phys Chem A 116:4551–4559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deringer VL, Englert U, Dronskowski R (2014) Covalency of hydrogen bonds in solids revisited. Chem Commun 50:11547–11549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernal JD, Fowler RH (1933) A theory of water and ionic solution, with particular reference to hydrogen and hydroxyl ions. J Chem Phys 1:515–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoo S, Kirov MV, Xantheas SS (2009) Low-energy networks of the T-cage \((\text{ H }_2{\rm O})_{24}\) cluster and their use in constructing periodic unit cells of the structure I (sI) hydrate lattice. J Am Chem Soc 131:7564–7566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chihaia V, Adams S, Kuhs WF (2004) Influence of water molecules arrangement on structure and stability of 5\(^{12}\) and 5\(^{12}\)6\(^2\) buckyball water clusters. A theoretical study. Chem Phys 297:271–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirov MV, Fanourgakis GS, Xantheas SS (2008) Identifying the most stable networks in polyhedral water clusters. Chem Phys Lett 461:180–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anick DJ (2003) Application of database methods to the prediction of B3LYP-optimized polyhedral water cluster geometries and electronic energies. J Chem Phys 119:12442–12456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tokmachev AM, Tchougréeff AL, Dronskowski R (2010) Hydrogen-bond networks in water clusters \((\text{ H }_2{\rm O})_{20}\): an exhaustive quantum-chemical analysis. ChemPhysChem 11:384–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo J-L, Coe JV, Singer SJ, Band YB, Ojamäe L (2001) On the use of graph invariants for efficiently generating hydrogen bond topologies and predicting physical properties of water clusters and ice. J Chem Phys 114:2527–2540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo J-L, Singer SJ (2003) Graph invariants for periodic systems: towards predicting physical properties from the hydrogen bond topology of ice. Phys Rev E 67:016114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer SJ, Kuo J-L, Hirsch TK, Knight C, Ojamäe L, Klein ML (2005) Hydrogen-bond topology and the ice VII/VIII and ice Ih/XI proton-ordering phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett 94:135701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knight C, Singer SJ, Kuo J-L, Hirsch TK, Ojamäe L, Klein ML (2006) Hydrogen bond topology and the ice VII/VIII and ice Ih/XI proton ordering phase transitions. Phys Rev E 73:056113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knight C, Singer SJ (2006) A reexamination of the ice III/IX hydrogen bond ordering phase transition. J Chem Phys 125:064506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knight C, Singer SJ (2008) Hydrogen bond ordering in ice V and the transition to ice XIII. J Chem Phys 129:164513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knight C, Singer SJ (2009) Site disorder in ice VII arising from hydrogen bond fluctuations. J Phys Chem A 113:12433–12438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tokmachev AM, Dronskowski R (2011) Hydrogen-bond networks in finite ice nanotubes. J Comp Chem 32:99–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tokmachev AM, Tchougréeff AL (2001) Semiempirical implementation of strictly localized geminals for analysis of molecular electronic structure. J Comp Chem 22:752–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tokmachev AM, Tchougréeff AL (2003) Fast NDDO method for molecular structure calculations based on strictly localized geminals. J Phys Chem A 107:358–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tokmachev AM, Tchougréeff AL (2005) Efficient multipole model and linear scaling of NDDO-based methods. J Phys Chem A 109:7613–7620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tchougréeff AL, Tokmachev AM, Dronskowski R (2009) Multipole model for the electron group function method. J Phys Chem A 113:11406–11415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Surján PR (1999) An introduction to the theory of geminals. Top Curr Chem 203:63–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokmachev AM (2015) Perspectives of geminal methods for large molecular systems. Int J Quantum Chem. doi:10.1002/qua.24963

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jeszenszki P, Nagy PR, Zoboki T, Szabados Á, Surján PR (2014) Perspectives of APSG-based multireference perturbation theories. Int J Quantum Chem 114:1048–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tokmachev AM, Tchougréeff AL (2006) Group functions approach based on the combination of strictly local geminals and molecular orbitals. Int J Quantum Chem 106:571–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Luo C, Fa W, Zhou J, Dong J, Zeng XC (2008) Ferroelectric ordering in ice nanotubes confined in carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 8:2607–2612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mikami F, Matsuda K, Kataura H, Maniwa Y (2009) Dielectric properties of water inside single-walled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano 3:1279–1287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Russian Science Foundation (Grant 14-19-00662), and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grants 13-07-00095 and 14-03-00867).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei L. Tchougréeff.

Additional information

Published as part of the special collection of articles “Festschrift in honour of P. R. Surjan”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokmachev, A.M., Tchougréeff, A.L. & Dronskowski, R. Benchmarks of graph invariants for hydrogen-bond networks in water clusters of different topology. Theor Chem Acc 134, 115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1720-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-015-1720-9

Keywords

Navigation