Log in

Impact of vanilla flavor on nicotine taste, choice, intake, and seeking behaviors

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Flavors can alter the orosensory properties of tobacco products. Specifically, flavors can serve as an oral cue for smokeless tobacco products.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the impact of oral vanillin, the principal chemical of vanilla flavor in tobacco products, on nicotine’s taste, and nicotine choice, intake, and seeking behaviors.

Methods

Experiments were performed in young adult Sprague Dawley rats. We employed a two-bottle free-choice test (2BC) to measure the preference for different concentrations of vanillin and its effect on nicotine preference. To explore the long-term effects of early exposure to sweetened vanillin, we utilized a combined 2BC and intraoral self-administration (IOSA) model. We assessed the nicotine taking and seeking behaviors in the presence or absence of vanillin. We performed a taste reactivity test (TRT) to quantify liking (ingestive) and disliking (aversive) taste responses to oral nicotine with or without vanillin.

Results

In 2BC, female rats preferred vanillin containing solutions more than their male counterparts. In IOSA, vanillin alone and in combination with nicotine led to greater IOSA compared to water. Female rats self-administered vanillin plus nicotine more than male rats. Vanillin increased motivation to nicotine taking, but only in females. In TRT, vanillin increased nicotine’s ingestive responses but blocked aversive responses in both sexes.

Conclusions

These results indicate that vanilla flavor can increase oral nicotine intake. It can also increase liking and decrease disliking of nicotine’s taste. Furthermore, the impact of vanilla flavor on nicotine taste and nicotine choice, intake, and seeking behaviors is concentration and sex dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere appreciation to Dr. Ralitza Gueorguieva, Director of Biostatistics in Department of Psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine, for their vital contribution to the robust statistical analysis, enhancing the quality of this article.

Funding

This work was supported by grant number [U54DA036151] from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) and the State of Connecticut, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the NIH, the FDA, or the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services or the State of Connecticut.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deniz Bagdas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

213_2024_6630_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 1: Fig. 1 Randomization in two-bottle choice paradigm experiments. Fig. 2 active and inactive lever press in Vanillin intraoral self-administration Active and inactive lever presses per hour over 15 days of self-administration of water (A, B), vanillin (10 µg/ml) (C, D), and vanillin (100 µg/ml) (E, F) in female and male rats. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of n = 7/sex/group. *p < 0.05 indicates main effects of test solution. Fig. 3 active and inactive lever press in vanillin and nicotine intraoral self-administration Active and inactive lever presses per hour over 15 days of self-administration of water (A, B), vanillin (10 µg/ml) (C, D), nicotine (10 µg/ml) (E, F), and vanillin + nicotine (G, H), for (A) female and (B) male rats. Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of n = 8–11/sex/group. * p < 0.05 indicates main effects of test solution.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagdas, D., Zepei, A.M., Harris, L. et al. Impact of vanilla flavor on nicotine taste, choice, intake, and seeking behaviors. Psychopharmacology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06630-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06630-9

Keywords

Navigation