Abstract
Ambiguity sensitive preferences must fail either Consequentialism or Dynamic Consistency (DC), two properties that are compatible with subjective expected utility and Bayesian updating, while forming the basis of backward induction and dynamic programming. We examine the connection between these properties in a general environment of convex preferences over monetary acts and find that, far from being incompatible, they are connected in an economically meaningful way. In single-agent decision problems, positive value of information characterises one direction of DC. We propose a weakening of DC and show that one direction is equivalent to weakly valuable information, whereas the other characterises the Bayesian updating of the subjective beliefs which are revealed by trading behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Al-Najjar, N.I., Weinstein, J.: The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment. Econ. Philos. 25(03), 249–284 (2009)
Amarante, M., Filiz, E.: Ambiguous events and maxmin expected utility. J. Econ. Theory 134(1), 1–33 (2007)
Anscombe, F.J., Aumann, R.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Stat. 34, 199–205 (1963)
Araujo, A., Chateauneuf, A., José, H.F., Bruno, H.: Updating pricing rules. Econ. Theory 68(2), 335–361 (2019)
Asano, T., Kojima, H.: Consequentialism and dynamic consistency in updating ambiguous beliefs. Econ. Theory 68(1), 223–250 (2019)
Blackwell, D.: Comparison of experiments. In: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 93–102. University of California Press (1951)
Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Montrucchio, L.: Uncertainty averse preferences. J. Econ. Theory 146(4), 1275–1330 (2011)
Chateauneuf, A., Faro, J.H.: Ambiguity through confidence functions. J. Math. Econ. 45(9–10), 535–558 (2009)
Dempster, A.P: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) (1968)
Dominiak, A., Lefort, J.-P.: Unambiguous events and dynamic Choquet preferences. Econ. Theory 46(3), 401–425 (2011)
Dominiak, A., Duersch, P., Lefort, J.-P.: A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment. Games Econ. Behav. 75(2), 625–638 (2012)
Eichberger, J., Kelsey, D.: Uncertainty aversion and dynamic consistency. Int. Econ. Rev. 37(3), 625–640 (1996)
Eichberger, J., Grant, S., Kelsey, D.: CEU preferences and dynamic consistency. Math. Soc. Sci. 49, 143–151 (2005)
Eichberger, J., Grant, S., Kelsey, D.: Randomization and dynamic consistency. Econ. Theory 62(3), 547–566 (2016)
Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75, 643–669 (1961)
Epstein, L.G.: An axiomatic model of non-Bayesian updating. Rev. Econ. Stud. 73(2), 413–436 (2006)
Epstein, L.G., Le Breton, M.: Dynamically consistent beliefs must be Bayesian. J. Econ. Theory 61(1), 1–22 (1993)
Epstein, L.G., Marinacci, M.: Mutual absolute continuity of multiple priors. J. Econ. Theory 137(1), 716–720 (2007)
Epstein, L.G., Schneider, M.: Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econ. Theory 113(1), 1–31 (2003)
Ergin, H., Gul, F.: A theory of subjective compound lotteries. J. Econ. Theory 144(3), 899–929 (2009)
Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: A new approach to updating beliefs. In: Bonissone, P.P., Henrion, M., Kanal, L.N., Lemmer, J.F. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, vol. 6, pp. 347–374. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991)
Faro, J.H., Lefort, J.-P.: Dynamic objective and subjective rationality. Theor. Econ. 14(1), 1–14 (2019)
Galanis, S.: The value of information under unawareness. J. Econ. Theory 157, 384–396 (2015)
Galanis, S.: The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness. Games Econ. Behav. 97, 1–18 (2016)
Galanis, S.: Speculative trade and the value of public information. J. Public Econ. Theory 23(1), 53–68 (2021)
Galanis, S., Kotronis, S.: Updating awareness and information aggregation. B.E. J. Theor. Econ., (forthcoming)
Galanis, S., Ioannou, C., Kotronis, S.: Information aggregation under ambiguity: theory and experimental evidence. Discussion Paper 20/05, City, University of London, London, UK, (November 2019). https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23527/
Geanakoplos, J.: Game theory without partitions, and applications to speculation and consensus. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 914 (1989)
Ghirardato, P.: Revisiting Savage in a conditional world. Econ. Theory 20(1), 83–92 (2002)
Ghirardato, P., Siniscalchi, M.: Risk sharing in the small and in the large. J. Econ. Theory 175, 730–765 (2018)
Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M.: Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J. Econ. Theory 118(2), 133–173 (2004)
Ghirardato, P., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M.: Revealed ambiguity and its consequences: updating. In: Mohammed, A., John H .(eds.) Advances in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty, volume 42 of Theory and Decision Library, pp. 3–18. Springer (2008)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18, 141–153 (1989)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Updating ambiguous beliefs. J. Econ. Theory 59, 33–49 (1993)
Grant, S., Kajii, A., Polak, B.: Preference for information and dynamic consistency. Theory Decis. 48(3), 263–286 (2000)
Green, J.R., Stokey, N.L.: Two representations of information structures and their comparisons. Technical report, Technical report no. 271: Economics series: Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University (1978)
Hanany, E., Klibanoff, P.: Updating preferences with multiple priors. Theor. Econ. 2, 261–298 (2007)
Hanany, E., Klibanoff, P.: Updating ambiguity averse preferences. B.E. J. Theor. Econ. 9(1), 1–53 (2009)
Hansen, L.P., Sargent, T.J.: Robust control and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. Papers Proc. 91(2), 60–66 (2001)
Hayashi, T., Miao, J.: Intertemporal substitution and recursive smooth ambiguity preferences. Theor. Econ. 6(3), 423–472 (2011)
Hirshleifer, J.: The private and social value of information and the reward to incentive activity. Am. Econ. Rev. 61, 561–574 (1971)
Jaffray, J.-Y.: Bayesian updating and belief functions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1144–1152 (1992)
Jaffray, J.-Y.: Dynamic decision making with belief functions. In: Ronald R.Y., Janusz K., Mario F. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster–Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 331–352. Wiley, New York (1994)
Karni, E., Safra, Z.: Dynamic consistency in English auctions and expected utility theory. Working paper 13-86, Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel (1986)
Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., Mukerji, S.: A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6), 1849–1892 (2005)
Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., Mukerji, S.: Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences. J. Econ. Theory 144(3), 930–976 (2009)
Kreps, D.: A representation theorem for “preference for flexibility”. Econometrica 47(3), 565–77 (1979)
Li, J.: Preferences for partial information and ambiguity. Theor. Econ. 13, 1059–1094 (2020)
Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6), 1447–1498 (2006a)
Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Dynamic variational preferences. J. Econ. Theory 128(1), 4–44 (2006b)
Machina, M.J.: Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econ. Lit. 27(4), 1622–68 (1989)
Madrian, B.C., Shea, D.F.: The power of suggestion: inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116(4), 1149–1187 (2001)
Harry, M.: Markowitz. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7, 77–91 (1952)
Masatlioglu, Y., Efe, A.O.: Rational choice with status quo bias. J. Econ. Theory 121(1), 1–29 (2005)
Milgrom, P., Stokey, N.: Information, trade, and common knowledge. J. Econ. Theory 26, 17–27 (1982)
Nau, R.F.: Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Manag. Sci. 52(1), 136–145 (2006)
Nehring, K.: Capacities and probabilistic beliefs: a precarious coexistence. Math. Soc. Sci. 38(2), 197–213 (1999)
Ortoleva, P.: Status quo bias, multiple priors and uncertainty aversion. Games Econ. Behav. 69(2), 411–424 (2010)
Pires, P.: A rule for updating ambiguous beliefs. Theory Decis. 53(2), 137–152 (2002)
Rigotti, L., Shannon, C., Strzalecki, T.: Subjective beliefs and ex ante trade. Econometrica 76(5), 1167–1190 (2008)
Sagi, J.S.: Anchored preference relations. J. Econ. Theory 130(1), 283–295 (2006)
Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R.: Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1(1), 7–59 (1988)
Sarin, R., Wakker, P.P.: Dynamic choice and nonexpected utility. J. Risk Uncertain. 17, 87–119 (1998)
Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley (1954)
Schlee, E.E.: The value of information in efficient risk-sharing arrangements. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(3), 509–524 (2001)
Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571–87 (1989)
Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Siniscalchi, M.: Bayesian updating for general maxmin expected utility preferences. Technical report, Discussion Paper 1366, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University (2001)
Siniscalchi, M.: Two out of three ain’t bad: a comment on “the ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment.” Econ Philos 25(03), 335–356 (2009)
Siniscalchi, M.: Dynamic choice under ambiguity. Theor. Econ. 6(3), (2011)
Snow, A.: Ambiguity and the value of information. J. Risk Uncertain. 40(2), 133–145 (2010)
Takashi, H.: Intertemporal substitution, risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Econ. Theory 25, 933–956 (2005)
Tobin, J.: Liquidity preference as behavior toward risk. Rev. Econ. Stud. 25, 65–86 (1958)
Vergopoulos, V.: Dynamic consistency for non-expected utility preferences. Econ. Theory 48(2), 493–518 (2011)
Wakker, P.: Non-expected utility as aversion to information. J Behav. Decis. Making 1, 169–175 (1988)
Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)
Wang, T.: Conditional preferences and updating. J. Econ. Theory 108, 286–321 (2003)
Wasserman, L., Kadane, J.B.: Bayes’ theorem for Choquet capacities. Ann. Stat. 18, 1328–1339 (1990)
Yaari, M.E.: Some remarks on measures of risk aversion and on their uses. J. Econ. Theory 1, 315–329 (1969)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper supersedes the paper “Dynamic Consistency and Subjective Beliefs”. I am grateful to the editor and two referees, Alain Chateauneuf, Michèle Cohen, Martin Cripps, Adam Dominiak, Paolo Ghirardato, Jürgen Eichberger, Larry G. Epstein, Tassos Karantounias, Peter Klibanoff, Stelios Kotronis, Jean-Philippe Lefort, Jian Li, Sujoy Mukerji, Pietro Ortoleva, Luca Rigotti, Chris Shannon and audiences at CRETE 2014, ASSET 2014, RES 2015, RUD 2015, Cergy-Pontoise, Manchester, Warwick and Royal Holloway.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Galanis, S. Dynamic consistency, valuable information and subjective beliefs. Econ Theory 71, 1467–1497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01351-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01351-y