Log in

Prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures among women prescribed osteoporosis medication in five European countries: the POSSIBLE EU® study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

European observational 1-year study assessed osteoporosis and fracture patterns in 3,402 postmenopausal women prescribed osteoporosis medication. Almost 40% of patients had a previous fracture, while 25% had neither fracture nor dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) diagnosis and were prescribed medication, probably due to other risk factors.

Introduction

This analysis assessed osteoporosis and fracture prevalence in postmenopausal women prescribed osteoporosis treatment in the Prospective Observational Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience in Europe(POSSIBLE EU®).

Methods

Women in this observational, multicenter 1-year study were categorized by fracture history and location at baseline. Baseline characteristics were analyzed according to no DXA and DXA diagnosis (osteoporosis or osteopenia). Fractures occurring during the 1-year follow-up period were recorded.

Results

Of the 3,402 women enrolled, 39% had a previous fracture, of whom 30% had ≥2 fractures. One thousand seven hundred and eighty-four (52%) patients had a DXA diagnosis (osteoporosis 68%, osteopenia 31%, and unknown 1%). Among the osteoporosis patients, 37% had a previous fracture (hip 2.9%, vertebral 8.8%, and non-hip, non-vertebral 25%) and 35% had fractures associated with major trauma. Of the 3,402 women, 1,476 (43%) had no DXA diagnosis; of these, 57% had no fracture (25% of all women). Risk factors varied across patients with and without DXA diagnosis. During the 1-year follow-up period, the fracture incidence in patients with or without a previous fracture at baseline was 4.7% and 1.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Almost 40% of patients prescribed osteoporosis medication had a previous fracture, highlighting a population with advanced disease. In contrast, 25% of patients had neither a previous fracture nor DXA diagnosis and were prescribed treatment, probably due to other risk factors. There is a need for continued improvement of disease management in European women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. FRAX® is a trademark of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases.

References

  1. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP et al (2003) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract 9:544–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delmas PD, Marin F, Marcus R et al (2007) Beyond hip: importance of other nonspinal fractures. Am J Med 120:381–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A et al (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC et al (2000) Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 11:556–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA et al (2003) The implications of regional variations in medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med 138:273–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE et al (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301:513–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C et al (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. (2009) Dachverband Osteologie. S3-Leitlinie Osteoporose. Version 2009. http://www.dv-osteologie.org/. Accessed on 27th April, 2010

  14. Freemantle N, Cooper C, Roux C et al (2010) Baseline observations from the POSSIBLE EU study: characteristics of postmenopausal women receiving bone loss medications. Arch Osteoporos (in press). doi:10.1007/s11657-010-0035-7

  15. Harrington JT, Ste-Marie LG, Brandi ML et al (2004) Risedronate rapidly reduces the risk for non-vertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 74:129–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan SG, Siris ES et al (2008) Wrist fracture as a predictor of future fractures in younger versus older postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 19:607–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borgström F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O et al (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Geel TA, van Helden S, Gleusens PP et al (2009) Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 68:99–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adami S, Isaia G, Luisetto G et al (2006) Fracture incidence and characterization in patients on osteoporosis treatment: the ICARO study. J Bone Miner Res 21:1565–1570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sambrook P, Adami S, Anderson FA et al (2009) Multinational comparison of bone health in women 55 years of age and older. The global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women [abstract]. Bone 44:S115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The steering committee thanks the investigators and patients who contributed to this study. The steering committee comprises the following: Nick Freemantle (Chair), Cyrus Cooper, Adolfo Díez-Pérez, Francis Guillemin, Rob Horne, Bengt Jonsson, Luc Martinez, Sergio Ortolani, Johannes Pfeilschifter and Christian Roux. Assistance in writing this manuscript was provided by Antonia Panayi, PhD, Amgen (Europe) GmbH and Andy Lockley, PhD, Bioscript Stirling Ltd, UK funded by Amgen (Europe) GmbH and GlaxoSmithKline. We would also like to thank Jon Cooke of Biometrica Ltd for biostatistical support and Alison Dobson of Amgen Ltd, UK, and Philip R. Holland of Holland Numerics Ltd, for programming support.

Funding

The study was sponsored by Amgen Inc.

Conflicts of interest

CR has received research grants and/or honoraria from Amgen, Alliance, MSD, Novartis, Roche and Servier. ADP has served as a speaker and consultant for Amgen. BJ has received funding for advisory boards from Amgen. LM has received consultancy fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche and Novo Nordisk. SO has received funding for advisory boards from Amgen, consulting fees and grant/research support from the Institut International de Recherche Servier, speaker’s fees from GlaxoSmithKline and grant research/support from Nycomed. NF has received funding for research, consulting and/or travel from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Servier, Pfizer and Sanofi Aventis. MG, GM and SS are employees of Amgen. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Roux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roux, C., Cooper, C., Díez-Pérez, A. et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures among women prescribed osteoporosis medication in five European countries: the POSSIBLE EU® study. Osteoporos Int 22, 1227–1236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1321-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1321-3

Keywords

Navigation