Log in

Online quantitative monitoring of milling cutter health condition based on deep convolutional autoencoder

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The health condition of milling cutters (HCOMC) could heavily affect workpiece quality. However, it is extremely difficult to be quantified online. To solve this problem, an online quantitative monitoring method (OQM) is proposed based on a deep convolutional autoencoder (CAE). In this method, a health indicator (HI) is constructed for fast HCOMC monitoring. The OQM is composed of two parts, offline training and online monitoring. In the offline stage, the multi-sensor monitoring data that record in the cutter normal wear stage (named normal wear data, NWD) are selected from a subsampled life testing dataset to train a deep CAE. In the online stage, each monitoring data segment (MDS) is directly input into the trained CAE to obtain deep representations. Then, the HI is constructed by the mean square error (MSE) between the MDS and the deep representations to monitor the HCOMC. It is called convolutional-autoencoder-reconstruction-error-based health indicator (CARE-HI). In addition to the above-mentioned method, a new metric named isometric fusion metric (IFM) is also designed to assess HI. IFM is able to address the uneven problem of property contribution when using some widely used HI metrics. In the experiment, 28 milling cutters were subjected to cutting experiments under different working conditions. The experimental result demonstrates that the proposed OQM can efficiently improve feature quality and precisely monitor HCOMC. It also illustrates that the CARE-HI outperformed some existing ones in five metric dimensions. Therefore, the proposed CARE-HI can provide more accurate guidance for tool changing in machining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Algorithm 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jardine A, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ** X, Siegel D, Weiss B, Gamel E, Wang W, Lee J, Ni J (2016) The present status and future growth of maintenance in US manufacturing: results from a pilot survey. Manuf Rev 3:10

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guo L, Yu Y, Liu Y, Gao H, Chen T (2022) Reconstruction domain adaptation transfer network for partial transfer learning of machinery fault diagnostics. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanachi H, Yu W, Kim Y, Liu J, Mechefske C (2019) Hybrid data-driven physics-based model fusion framework for tool wear prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:2861–2872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurada S, Bradley C (1997) A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Comput Ind 34(1):55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kong D, Chen Y, Li N (2018) Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 104:556–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain A, Lad B (2019) A novel integrated tool condition monitoring system. J Intell Manuf 30:1423–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohanraj T, Shankar S, Rajasekar R, Sakthivel N, Pramanik A (2020) Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process-a review. J Mater Res Technol 9(1):1032–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanzetta M (2001) A new flexible high-resolution vision sensor for tool condition monitoring. J Mater Process Technol 119(1–3):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim H, Son S, Wong Y, Rahman M (2007) Development and evaluation of an on-machine optical measurement device. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(10):1556–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. **dal A (2012) Analysis of tool wear rate in drilling operation using scanning electron microscope (SEM). J Miner Mater Charact Eng 11(1):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang J, Gao H, **ang S, Chen L, You Z, Lei Y (2022) Research on tool wear morphology and mechanism during turning nickel-based alloy GH4169 with PVD-TiAlN coated carbide tool. Wear:508, 204468–509

  13. Karthik A, Chandra S, Ramamoorthy B, Das S (1997) 3D tool wear measurement and visualisation using stereo imaging. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(11):1573–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu X, Lin X, Dai Y, Zhu K (2017) Image edge detection based tool condition monitoring with morphological component analysis. ISA Trans 69:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun W, Yeh S (2018) Using the machine vision method to develop an on-machine insert condition monitoring system for computer numerical control turning machine tools. Materials 11(10):1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen S, Luo Z (2020) Study of using cutting chip color to the tool wear prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. You Z, Gao H, Guo L, Liu Y, Li J (2020) On-line milling cutter wear monitoring in a wide field-of-view camera. Wear 460:203479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. You Z, Gao H, Guo L, Liu Y, Li J, Li C (2022) Machine vision based adaptive online condition monitoring for milling cutter under spindle rotation. Mech Syst Signal Process 171:108904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. You Z, Gao H, Li S, Guo L, Liu Y, Li J (2022) Multiple activation functions and data augmentation based light weight network for in-situ tool condition monitoring. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 69(12):13656–13664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abu-Mahfouz I (2003) Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signals and artificial neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(7):707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhat N, Dutta S, Pal S, Pal S (2016) Tool condition classification in turning process using hidden Markov model based on texture analysis of machined surface images. Measurement 90:500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwenzer M, Miura K, Bergs T (2019) Machine learning for tool wear classification in milling based on force and current sensors. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 520:012009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li H, Hao B, Dai Y, Yang R (2019) Wear status recognition for milling cutter based on compressed sensing and noise stacking sparse auto-encoder. J Mech Eng 55(14):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li G, Wang Y, He J, Hao Q, Yang H, Wei J (2020) Tool wear state recognition based on gradient boosting decision tree and hybrid classification RBM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karandikar J, Schmitz T, Smith S (2021) Physics-guided logistic classification for tool life modeling and process parameter optimization in machining. J Manuf Syst 59:522–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ou J, Li H, Huang G, Yang G (2021) Intelligent analysis of tool wear state using stacked denoising autoencoder with online sequential-extreme learning machine. Measurement 167:108153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Twardowski P, Tabaszewski M, Wiciak-Pikuła M, Felusiak-Czyryca A (2021) Identification of tool wear using acoustic emission signal and machine learning methods. Precis Eng 72:738–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang J, Duan J, Li T, Hu C, Liang J, Shi T (2022) Tool wear monitoring in milling based on fine-grained image classification of machined surface images. Sensors 22:8416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nouri M, Fussell B, Ziniti B, Linder E (2015) Real-time tool wear monitoring in milling using a cutting condition independent method. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Liu X, Yue C, Liu S, Zhang B, Li R, Liang S, Wang L (2021) A data-driven approach for tool wear recognition and quantitative prediction based on radar map feature fusion. Measurement 185:110072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo L, Yu Y, Gao H, Feng T, Liu Y (2022) Online remaining useful life prediction of milling cutters based on multisource data and feature learning. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 18(8):5199–5208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jiao J, Zhao M, Lin J, Liang K (2020) A comprehensive review on convolutional neural network in machine fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing 417:36–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Javed K, Gouriveau R, Zerhouni N, Nectoux P (2015) Enabling health monitoring approach based on vibration data for accurate prognostics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(1):647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo L, Yu Y, Duan A, Gao H, Zhang J (2022) An unsupervised feature learning based health indicator construction method for performance assessment of machines. Mech Syst Signal Process 167:108573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lei Y, Li N, Guo L, Li N, Yan T, Lin J (2018) Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mech Syst Signal Process 104:799–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported in part by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars under Grant 52105562, in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51905452, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant 2682022CX058, and in part by the Local Development Foundation guided by the Central Government under Grant 2020ZYD012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yuncong Lei and Changgen Li: writing—original draft, methodology, conceptualization, data curation, validation, investigation, and formal analysis. Liang Guo and Hongli Gao: writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, methodology, resources, and formal analysis. Junhua Liang: writing—review and editing, conceptualization, and formal analysis. Yi Sun: writing—review and editing, resources, and formal analysis. Jigang He: writing–review and editing, investigation, and formal analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors agreed to participate.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to manuscript submission.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, Y., Li, C., Guo, L. et al. Online quantitative monitoring of milling cutter health condition based on deep convolutional autoencoder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125, 4739–4752 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10963-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10963-8

Keywords

Navigation