Log in

Electrorheological fluid–assisted ultrasonic polishing for IN625 additively manufactured surfaces

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology develops rapidly and is widely used in various fields. However, high surface roughness of metal components produced by representative AM processes for metallic materials such as laser-based powder bed fusion (L-PBF) is an important problem that needs to be solved. In this work, electrorheological (ER) fluid–assisted ultrasonic polishing is proposed to improve surface finish of metal AM parts. The principle of how an ER fluid works on the polishing process is discussed by calculating the electric field distribution and forces exerted on the abrasive particles. The effects of different field intensities caused by different voltages and electrode gaps on the ultrasonic polishing of AM surfaces are discussed by both experiments and simulations. The motion behaviors of abrasive particles after applying ER fluid are also studied by experimental observations. According to the simulation and experimental results, increasing voltage and reducing electrode gap can improve the electric field intensity, which improves the ER effect and makes a more stable aggregation of abrasive particles in the machining zone. Average surface roughness Ra is reduced to 2.74 μm from the initial value of 5.6 μm after 20 min ER fluid–assisted ultrasonic polishing under the voltage of 2000 V and the electrode gap of 3 mm. Ra improvement of the surface polished with ER effect is 11% higher than that without ER effect. The results show that in a certain range, ER effect can improve the ultrasonic polishing capability and a better surface finish can be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wei C, Zhang Z, Cheng D, Sun Z, Zhu M, Li L (2021) An overview of laser-based multiple metallic material additive manufacturing: from macro-to micro-scales. Int J Extrem Manuf 3:012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ABCE04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mueller B (2012) Additive manufacturing technologies—rapid prototy** to direct digital manufacturing. Assembly Autom 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/aa.2012.03332baa.010

  3. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 81:465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. **ong J, Lei Y, Chen H, Zhang G (2017) Fabrication of inclined thin-walled parts in multi-layer single-pass GMAW-based additive manufacturing with flat position deposition. J Mater Process Tech 240:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen L, Li H, Liu S, Shen S, Zhang T, Huang Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y, He B, Yang C (2019) Simulation of surface deformation control during selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg powder using an external magnetic field. AIP Adv 9(4):045012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumbhar NN, Mulay AV (2018) Post processing methods used to improve surface finish of products which are manufactured by additive manufacturing technologies: a review. J Inst Eng (India): Series C 99:481–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0340-z

  7. Lee JY, Nagalingam AP, Yeo SH (2021) A review on the state-of-the-art of surface finishing processes and related ISO/ASTM standards for metal additive manufactured components. Virtual Phys Prototy 16:68–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1830346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon ER, Shokrani A, Flynn JM, Goguelin S, Barclay J, Dhokia V (2016) A surface modification decision tree to influence design in additive manufacturing. In: Setchi R, Howlett R, Liu Y, Theobald P (eds) Sustainable design and manufacturing 2016. SDM 2016. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_36

  9. Löber L, Flache C, Petters R, Kühn U, Eckert J (2013) Comparison of different post processing technologies for SLM generated 316l steel parts. Rapid Prototy** J 19(3):173–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541311312166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu Y, Wang X, Gao H, Wei H, Li S (2016) Blade surface uniformity of blisk finished by abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 84:1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8270-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan KL, Yeo SH (2017) Surface modification of additive manufactured components by ultrasonic cavitation abrasive finishing. Wear 378:90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan KL, Vohra MS, Tan WL, Nagalingam AP, Yeo SH, Arthur WEE (2020) Finishing a surface of a component made by additive manufacturing: U.S. Patent Application 16/690,295[P]. 2020–5–28

  13. Tan KL, Yeo SH (2020) Surface finishing on IN625 additively manufactured surfaces by combined ultrasonic cavitation and abrasion. Addit Manuf 31:100938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J, Zhu J, Liew PJ (2019) Material removal in ultrasonic abrasive polishing of additive manufactured components. Appl Sci-Basel 9(24):5359. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang S, Zhao H, Zhang Q (2017) The application status and development trends of ultrasonic machining technology. J Mech Eng 53:22–32. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2017.19.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hocheng H, Kuo KL (2002) Fundamental study of ultrasonic polishing of mold steel. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00099-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim WB, Min BK, Lee SJ (2004) Development of a padless ultraprecision polishing method using electrorheological fluid. J Mater Process Tech 155:1293–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu JB, Yan QS, Tian H, Kong LY (2009) Polishing properties of tiny grinding wheel based on Fe3O4 electrorheological fluid. J Mater Process Tech 209:4954–4957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang H, Cheng H, Feng Y (2017) Improvement of high-power laser performance for super-smooth optical surfaces using electrorheological finishing technology. Appl Optics 56:9822–9829. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.009822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim WB, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lee ES (2003) The electromechanical principle of electrorheological fluid-assisted polishing. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00143-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao T, Deng Q, Yuan J, Lyu B, Lin Y (2016) An experimental investigation of flat polishing with dielectrophoretic (DEP) effect of slurry. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 84:1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8372-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuriyagawa T, Saeki M, Syoji K (2002) Electrorheological fluid-assisted ultra-precision polishing for small three-dimensional parts. Precis Eng 26:370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(02)00112-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Linoya K (1986) Powder technology handbook. Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun (in Japanese)

  24. Reisman GE, Wang YC, Brennen CE (1998) Observations of shock waves in cloud cavitation. J Fluid Mech 355:255–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112097007830

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Lind SJ, Phillips TN (2012) Bubble collapse in compressible fluids using a spectral element marker particle method. Part 1. Newtonian fluids. Int J Numer Meth Fl 70:1167–1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2737

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51805067), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2019M651093), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant no. 3132019366).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J. Wang; investigation, X. Liu, and D. Teng; methodology, J. Wang, and P. Liew; validation, X. Liu, and C. Huang; writing-original draft preparation, X. Liu; writing—review and editing, J. Wang, P. Liew, and C. Huang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **gsi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The author hopes that this paper can be applied to the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Consent for publication

The authors agree to be published in the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Wang, J., Teng, D. et al. Electrorheological fluid–assisted ultrasonic polishing for IN625 additively manufactured surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 891–905 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08838-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08838-5

Keywords

Navigation