Log in

Manufacturing signature in variational and vector-loop models for tolerance analysis of rigid parts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To control and to manage the geometric deviations along the product life cycle, the first step is to consider, during the design stage, the tolerance specification, the tolerance allocation and the tolerance analysis. Many approaches of the literature for tolerance analysis of rigid assemblies exist, and different commercial computer-aided tolerancing (CAT) software packages were developed with those models. However, there is a growing interest in considering working conditions and operating windows in CAT. As a response to these needs, skin model concept was proposed. The aim of this paper is to connect a point cloud-based discrete geometry framework (i.e. a skin model representation) to the manufacturing processes, in order to bring the CAT simulation tools closer to reality. In this work, the effect of a manufacturing process on solving a stack-up function is investigated throughout circular profiles obtained by a turning process. A case study has been defined and solved using two literature models, the variational model and the vector-loop one, by considering the manufacturing signature. The results have been compared to those obtained by the same models without considering the manufacturing signature. Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out by solving the stack-up functions into Matlab® software, and statistical analyses have been carried out by Minitab® software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schleich B, Anwer N, Mathieu L, Wartzack S (2014) Skin Model Shapes: a new paradigm shift for geometric variations modelling in mechanical engineering. Comput Aid Des 50:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armillotta A, Semeraro Q (2011) Geometric tolerances-impact on product design, quality inspection and statistical process monitoring. In: Colosimo BM, Senin N (eds) Geometric tolerance specification, 1st revision. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chase KW, Gao J, Magleby SP (1995) General 2-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments. J Des Manuf 5(4):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao J, Chase KW, Magleby SP (1998) General 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments. IIE Trans 30:367–377

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martino PM, Gabriele GA (1989) Application of variational geometry to the analysis of mechanical tolerance. In: 8th Biennal Conference on Failure Prevention and Reliability. Quebec, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyer M, Stewart NF (1991) Modeling spaces for toleranced objects. Int Journal Rob Res 10:470–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta S, Turner JU (1993) Variational solid modelling for tolerance analysis. IEEE Comput Graph 13:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Desrochers A, Rivière A (1997) A matrix approach to the representation of tolerance zones and clearances. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13:630–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lafond P, Laperrière L (1999) Jacobian-based modeling of dispersions affecting pre-defined functional requirements of mechanical assemblies. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Porto, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laperrière L, Lafond P (1999) Modeling tolerances and dispersions of mechanical assemblies using virtual joints. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Sept. 12–15, Las Vegas, NV

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clément A, Riviére A, Serré P, Valade C (1998) The TTRSs: 13 constraints for dimensioning and tolerancing. In: ElMaraghy HA (ed) Geometric design tolerancing: theories, standards and applications, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 123–131

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rivest L, Fortini C, Morel C (1994) Tolerancing a solid model with a kinematic formulation. Comput Aid Des 26:465–476

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourdet P, Mathieu L, Lartigue C, Ballu A (1996) The concept of the small displacement torsor in metrology. Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology II, World Scientific, Singapore, pp 110–122

    Google Scholar 

  14. Desrochers A, Ghie W, Laperrière L (2003) Application of a unified Jacobian-Torsor model for tolerance analysis. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3:1–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson JK, Mujezinovic A, Shah JJ (2002) A new mathematical model for geometric tolerances as applied to round faces. J Mech Des-T ASME 124:609–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ameta A, Davidson JK, Shah JJ (2007) Influence of form on frequency distribution for 1-D clearance which is generated from tolerance-maps. In: Proceedings of the Tenth CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Mar. 21–23, Erlangen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anselmetti B, Chavanne R, Yang J-X, Anwer N (2010) Quick GPS: a new CAT system for single-part tolerancing. Comput Aided Des 42(9):768–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Armillotta A, Semeraro Q (2012) Critical operating conditions for assemblies with parameter-dependent dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing

    Google Scholar 

  19. Polini W (2012) Taxonomy of models for tolerance analysis in assembling. Int J Prod Res 50(7):2014–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ameta G, Serge S, Giordano M (2011) Comparison of spatial math models for tolerance analysis: tolerance-maps, deviation domain, and TTRS. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 11(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charpentier F, Ballu A, Pailhes J (2012) A scientific point of view of a simple industrial tolerancing process. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on computer aided tolerancing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dantan JK, Anwer N, Mathieu L (2003) Integrated tolerancing process for conceptual design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technology 52(1):135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moroni G, Pacella M (2008) An approach based on process signature modeling for roundness evaluation of manufactured items. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marziale M, Polini W (2010) A new model based on variational solid modelling. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Instanbul, Turkey, July 12–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marziale M, Polini W (2009) A review of two models for tolerance analysis of an assembly: vector loop and matrix. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 43(11-12):1106–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilma Polini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrado, A., Polini, W. Manufacturing signature in variational and vector-loop models for tolerance analysis of rigid parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 2153–2161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8947-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8947-z

Keyword

Navigation