Abstract
This paper presents a multi-objective topology optimization process for the body structure of the suspension mounting point to determine the optimum configuration that reduces the acceleration under external dynamic loads. As it is difficult to avoid the excitation force that occurs inside or outside the vehicle while driving, it is important to install a reinforcing structure in the vehicle to decrease the vibration that can directly affect the ride comfort of occupants. However, when a dynamic load is considered in the topology optimization problem, it is difficult to determine the optimum reinforcing bracket configurations because the material distribution is not always continuous, and the design variables converge to intermediate values that make the optimum design representation ambiguous. Discontinuous and unclear design tends to occurs more in dynamic load problems since the distribution of material in a design domain mostly affects the dynamic performance. Moreover, the objective function results would be worsened or enhanced depending on how the design space is defined. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a systematic process to derive an optimized design that not only enhances performance but is also suitable for manufacturability. Accordingly, an optimum reinforcing bracket configuration was obtained via a systematic approach. The area connected to nearby components is determined via sequential optimization, and both dynamic and static loads are simultaneously considered in the multi-objective optimization to derive a continuous design. The material distribution trend in the design space is investigated from the obtained designs, and the final design is modeled using shell elements considering manufacturability. It was confirmed that within a limited amount of material, the overall vehicle acceleration could be reduced.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00158-022-03409-4/MediaObjects/158_2022_3409_Fig16_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armentani E, Giannella V, Parente A, Pirelli M (2020) Design for NVH: topology optimization of an engine bracket support. Procedia Structural Integrity 26:211–218
Ding H, Xu B, Duan Z, Zhao Y (2021) Concurrent design of the free dam** structure for minimizing the frequency response in a broad frequency band. Eng Optim 54:1–16
Jung J, Hyun J, Goo S, Wang S (2015) An efficient design sensitivity analysis using element energies for topology optimization of a frequency response problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 296:196–210
Kwon K, Seo M, Kim H, Lee TH, Lee J, Min S (2019) Multi-objective optimisation of hydro-pneumatic suspension with gas–oil emulsion for heavy-duty vehicles. Vehicle Syst Dyn 58:1–20
Li Z, Duan LB, Cheng AG, Yao ZP, Chen T, Yao W (2019) Lightweight and crashworthiness design of an electric vehicle using a six-sigma robust design optimization method. Eng Optim 51(8):1393–1411
Liu T, Zhu JH, Zhang WH, Zhao H, Kong J, Gao T (2019) Integrated layout and topology optimization design of multi-component systems under harmonic base acceleration excitations. Struct Multidisc Optim 59(4):1053–1073
Olhoff N, Du J (2016) Generalized incremental frequency method for topological design of continuum structures for minimum dynamic compliance subject to forced vibration at a prescribed low or high value of the excitation frequency. Struct Multidisc Optim 54(5):1113–1141
Ryu N, Seo M, Min S (2021) Multi-objective topology optimization incorporating an adaptive weighed-sum method and a configuration-based clustering scheme. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 385:114015
Şendur P (2020) Application and optimization of dam** pad to a body-in-white of a vehicle for improved road noise, vibration and harshness performance. Int J Auto Eng Technol 9(1):42–51
Silva OM, Neves MM, Lenzi A (2019) A critical analysis of using the dynamic compliance as objective function in topology optimization of one-material structures considering steady-state forced vibration problems. J Sound Vib 444:1–20
Silva OM, Neves MM, Lenzi A (2020) On the use of active and reactive input power in topology optimization of one-material structures considering steady-state forced vibration problems. J Sound Vib 464:114989
Silva OM, Valentini F, Cardoso EL (2021) Shape and position preserving design of vibrating structures by controlling local energies through topology optimization. J Sound Vib 515:116478
Song Z, Li J, Han X, Xu L, Lu L, Ouyang M, Hofmann H (2014) Multi-objective optimization of a semi-active battery/supercapacitor energy storage system for electric vehicles. Appl Energy 135:212–224
Song CY, Lee J, Choi HY (2019) Multi-objective optimization in the vibration characteristics of a hydraulic steering system using a conservative and feasible response surface method. Eng Optim 52:1–19
Takezawa A, Daifuku M, Nakano Y, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto T, Kitamura M (2016) Topology optimization of dam** material for reducing resonance response based on complex dynamic compliance. J Sound Vib 365:230–243
Valentini F, Silva OM, Cardoso EL (2021) Robust topology optimization for harmonic displacement minimization of structures subjected to uncertainty in the excitation frequency. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 379:113767
Vicente WM, Zuo ZH, Pavanello R, Calixto TKL, Picelli R, **e YM (2016) Concurrent topology optimization for minimizing frequency responses of two-level hierarchical structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:116–136
Wang X (ed) (2010) Vehicle noise and vibration refinement. Elsevier, pp 21–24
Wang D, Zhang S, Xu W (2019) Multi-objective optimization design of wheel based on the performance of 13° and 90° impact tests. Int J Crashworthiness 24(3):336–361
**ong F, Wang D, Chen S, Gao Q, Tian S (2018) Multi-objective lightweight and crashworthiness optimization for the side structure of an automobile body. Struct Multidisc Optim 58(4):1823–1843
Zhao X, Wu B, Li Z, Zhong H (2018) A method for topology optimization of structures under harmonic excitations. Struct Multidisc Optim 58(2):475–487
Zhao J, Yoon H, Youn BD (2019) An efficient concurrent topology optimization approach for frequency response problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:700–734
Zhong W, Su R, Gui L, Fan Z (2016) Multi-objective topology and sizing optimization of bus body frame. Struct Multidisc Optim 54(3):701–714
Zhu JH, He F, Liu T, Zhang WH, Liu Q, Yang C (2018) Structural topology optimization under harmonic base acceleration excitations. Struct Multidisc Optim 57(3):1061–1078
Funding
The study was supported by the Hyundai Motor Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Replication of results
The code used in this paper cannot be disclosed as it is the property of Hyundai Motor Group that funded this study.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Axel Schumacher
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ryu, N., Hwang, K.H., Park, J.H. et al. Body reinforcement design of suspension mounting point under dynamic loads using multi-objective topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 65, 301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03409-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03409-4