Abstract
Media exposure can shape audience perceptions surrounding novel innovations, such as artificial intelligence (AI), and could influence whether they share information about AI with others online. This study examines the indirect association between exposure to AI in the media and information sharing about AI online. We surveyed 567 US citizens aged 18 and older in November 2020, several months after the release of Open AI’s transformative GPT-3 model. Results suggest that AI media exposure was related to online information sharing through psychological proximity to the impacts of AI and positive AI performance expectancy in serial mediation. This positive indirect association became stronger the more an individual perceived society to be changing due to new technology. Results imply that public exposure to AI in the media could significantly impact public understanding of AI, and prompt further information sharing online.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00146-024-01997-x/MediaObjects/146_2024_1997_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00146-024-01997-x/MediaObjects/146_2024_1997_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf Syst Res 9(2):204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS (2020) MTurk research: review and recommendations. J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969787
Ahva L, Pantti M (2014) Proximity as a journalistic keyword in the digital era: a study on the “Closeness” of amateur news images. Digit J 2(3):322–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.895505
Alaiad A, Zhou L (2014) The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Med Inf 83(11):825–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.003
Alalwan AA (2018) Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention. Int J Inf Manage 42:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.i**fomgt.2018.06.001
Assenmacher D, Clever L, Frischlich L, Quandt T, Trautmann H, Grimme C (2020) Demystifying social bots: On the intelligence of automated social media actors. Soc Med Soc 6:3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120939264
Badenschier F, Wormer H (2012) Issue selection in science journalism: towards a special theory of news values for science news? In: Rödder S, Franzen M, Weingart P (eds) The sciences’ media connection—public communication and its repercussions. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_4
Ball-Rokeach SJ (1985) The origins of individual media-system dependency: a sociological framework. Commun Res 12(4):485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365085012004003
Bednarek M, Caple H (2017) The discourse of news values: How news organizations create newsworthiness. In: The discourse of news values, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190653934.001.0001/acprof-9780190653934
Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Polit Anal 20(3):351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
Bingaman J, Brewer PR, Paintsil A, Wilson DC (2021) “Siri, Show Me Scary Images of AI”: effects of text-based frames and visuals on support for artificial intelligence. Sci Commun 43(3):388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547021998069
Bobkowski PS (2015) Sharing the news: effects of informational utility and opinion leadership on online news sharing. J Mass Commun Quart 92(2):320–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015573194
Brauner P, Hick A, Philipsen R, Ziefle M (2023) What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Front Comput Sci. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903
Brennen JS, Howard PN, Nielsen RK (2018) An industry-led debate: How UK media cover artificial intelligence (Oxford Martin Programme on Misinformation, Science and Media, p. 10) [Factsheet]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Oxford University. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-12/Brennen_UK_Media_Coverage_of_AI_FINAL.pdf
Brewer PR, Bingaman J, Paintsil A, Wilson DC, Dawson W (2022) Media use, interpersonal communication, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Sci Commun 44(5):559–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221130307
Brossard D (2013) New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:14096–14101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212744110
Bruun EPG, Duka A (2018) Artificial intelligence, jobs and the future of work: racing with the machines. Basic Income Stud 13:2. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2018-0018
Chang I-C, Hwang H-G, Hung W-F, Li Y-C (2007) Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl 33(2):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.001
CloudResearch (2021) Online participant recruitment for research & surveys. CloudResearch. https://www.cloudresearch.com/
Coeckelbergh M (2020) AI Ethics. MIT Press
Duan R, Zwickle A, Takahashi B (2022) Refining the application of construal level theory: egocentric and nonegocentric psychological distances in climate change visual communication. Environ Commun 16(1):92–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1964999
Dudo A, Dunwoody S, Scheufele DA (2011) The emergence of nano news: tracking thematic trends and changes in US newspaper coverage of nanotechnology. J Mass Commun Quart 88(1):55–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800104
Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Jeyaraj A, Clement M, Williams MD (2019) Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model. Inf Syst Front 21(3):719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Tamilmani K, Raman R (2020) A meta-analysis based modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (Meta-UTAUT): a review of emerging literature. Curr Opin Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Gao S, He L, Chen Y, Li D, Lai K (2020) Public perception of artificial intelligence in medical care: content analysis of social media. J Med Internet Res 22(7):e16649. https://doi.org/10.2196/16649
Goode L (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media Soc 11(8):1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341393
Grübler A (2010) Technological change and the environment. Routledge
Hallman WK (2017) What the public thinks and knows about science—and why it matters. In: Jamieson KH, Kahan DM, Scheufele D (eds) The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Oxford University Press, pp 61–72
Hauser DJ, Schwarz N (2016) Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav Res Methods 48(1):400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
Hayes AF (2005) Statistical methods for communication science, 1st edn. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613707
Hayles NK (2020) Ethics for cognitive assemblages: Who’s in charge here? In: Herbrechter S, Callus I, Rossini M, Grech M, de Bruin-Molé M, John Müller C (eds) Palgrave handbook of critical posthumanism. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_11-1
Heaven WD (2023) How existential risk became the biggest meme in AI. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/19/1075140/how-existential-risk-became-biggest-meme-in-ai/
Islam AKMN, Laato S, Talukder S, Sutinen E (2020) Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: an affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 159:120201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201
Kennedy B, Tyson A, Saks E (2023) Public awareness of artificial intelligence in everyday activities. Pew Res Center Sci Soc. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/15/public-awareness-of-artificial-intelligence-in-everyday-activities/
Kirkpatrick AW (2021) The spread of fake science: lexical concreteness, proximity, misinformation sharing, and the moderating role of subjective knowledge. Public Underst Sci 30(1):55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520966165
Kirkpatrick AW, Hmielowski JD, Boyd AD (2022) The indirect effects of episodic-thematic framing on information sharing about the economic threat of artificial intelligence. Commun Stud 73(5–6):577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2121737
Loges WE, Ball-Rokeach SJ (1993) Dependency relations and newspaper readership. J Q 70(3):602–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000311
Lyu Y, Wang X, Lin R, Wu J (2022) Communication in human–AI co-creation: perceptual analysis of paintings generated by text-to-image system. Appl Sci 12(22):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211312
MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Preacher KJ, Hong S (2001) Sample size in factor analysis: the role of model error. Multivar Behav Res 36(4):611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
Mao Y, Shi-Kupfer K (2023) Online public discourse on artificial intelligence and ethics in China: context, content, and implications. AI Soc 38(1):373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01309-7
McCombs M (2018) Setting the Agenda: mass media and public opinion, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Boca Raton
Melki J, Kozman C (2019) Media dependency, selective exposure and trust during war: media sources and information needs of displaced and non-displaced Syrians. Media War Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219861907
Milton CL (2023) ChatGPT and forms of deception. Nurs Sci Q 36(3):232–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184231169753
Nader K, Toprac P, Scott S, Baker S (2022) Public understanding of artificial intelligence through entertainment media. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01427-w
National Science Board (2018) Science and technology: public attitudes and public understanding (science & engineering indicators 2018). National Science Board. https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-technology-public-attitudes-and-understanding/highlights
Nguyen D, Hekman E (2022) The news framing of artificial intelligence: a critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01511-1
Nideröst S, Gredig D, Hassler B, Uggowitzer F, Weber P (2018) The intention to use HIV-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men in Switzerland: Testing an extended explanatory model drawing on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). J Public Health 26(3):247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0869-1
Nilsson NJ (2010) The quest for artificial intelligence: a history of ideas and achievements (web version). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819346
O’Shaughnessy MR, Schiff DS, Varshney LR, Rozell CJ, Davenport MA (2023) What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance? Sci Publ Policy 50(2):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac056
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Simon and Schuster, New York
Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business, New York
Schwalbe CB, Silcock BW, Candello E (2015) Gatecheckers at the visual news stream: a new model for classic gatekee** theory. J Pract 9(4):465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1030133
Seo SN (2017) Breakthrough technologies: technological innovations as an alternative global warming solution. In: Seo SN (ed) The behavioral economics of climate change. Academic Press, New York, pp 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811874-0.00005-2
Shoufan A (2023) Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access 11:38805–38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224
Simay AE, Wei Y, Gyulavári T, Syahrivar J, Gaczek P, Hofmeister-Tóth Á (2022) The e-WOM intention of artificial intelligence (AI) color cosmetics among Chinese social media influencers. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 35(7):1569–1598. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2022-0352
Singler B (2020) “Blessed by the algorithm”: theistic conceptions of artificial intelligence in online discourse. AI Soc 35(4):945–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00968-2
Slater MD (2007) Reinforcing spirals: the mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Commun Theory 17(3):281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
Srnicek N (2014) Cognitive assemblages and the production of knowledge. In: Acuto M, Curtis S (eds) Reassembling international theory: assemblage thinking and international relations. Palgrave, Macmillan, pp 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383969_5
Sun S, Zhai Y, Shen B, Chen Y (2020) Newspaper coverage of artificial intelligence: a perspective of emerging technologies. Telematics Inform 53:101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101433
Sundstrom B (2016) Mothers “Google It Up:” extending communication channel behavior in diffusion of innovations theory. Health Commun 31(1):91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.936339
Syme P (2023) A future “God-like AI” could destroy humans or make them obsolete if not properly contained, a prolific AI investor warned. Bus Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/god-like-ai-needs-safety-net-heated-competition-ai-investor-2023-4
Trilling D, Tolochko P, Burscher B (2017) From Newsworthiness to shareworthiness: how to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. J Mass Commun Quart 94(1):38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682
Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(2):440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Vergeer M (2020) Artificial intelligence in the Dutch press: an analysis of topics and trends. Commun Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1733038
Waldherr A (2012) The mass media as actors in innovation systems. In: Bauer J, Lang A, Schneider V (eds) Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries. Springer, pp 77–100
Walrave M, Waeterloos C, Ponnet K (2020) Ready or not for contact tracing? Investigating the adoption intention of COVID-19 contact-tracing technology using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0483
Weeks BE, Holbert RL (2013) Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: a focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. J Mass Commun Quart 90(2):212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906
Yadegaridehkordi E, Nizam Bin Md, Nasir MH, Noor FBM (2018) Predicting the adoption of cloud-based technology using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and structural equation modelling approaches. Appl Soft Comput 66:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.051
Zeng J, Chan C, Schäfer MS (2022) Contested Chinese dreams of AI? Public discourse about Artificial intelligence on WeChat and People’s Daily Online. Inf Commun Soc 25(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776372
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kirkpatrick, A.W., Boyd, A.D. & Hmielowski, J.D. Who shares about AI? Media exposure, psychological proximity, performance expectancy, and information sharing about artificial intelligence online. AI & Soc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01997-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01997-x