Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction: Intensive Care Medicine https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07256-9
In the second paragraph of the second page, the first sentence
“When using chemical sterilisation, such as ethyleneoxide gas or glutaraldehyde solution for bronchoscopes, reusable equipment will typically always have a lower carbon footprint compared to reusables.”
should be changed into:
“When using chemical sterilisation, such as ethylene-oxide gas or glutaraldehyde solution for bronchoscopes, reusable equipment will typically always have a lower carbon footprint compared to single use.”
The original article has been corrected. The Authors apologize for the mistake.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGain, F., McAlister, S. Correction: Reusable versus single-use ICU equipment: what’s the environmental footprint?. Intensive Care Med 50, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07292-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07292-5