SpringerLink
Log in

Central venous pressure not appropriate to guide volume administration in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Helms J, Carrier M, Klok FA (2023) High-risk pulmonary embolism in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07011-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R (2013) Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 41:1774–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A (2016) Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 42:324–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Jennings CS, Jiménez D, Kucher N, Lang IM, Lankeit M, Lorusso R, Mazzolai L, Meneveau N, F NÁ, Prandoni P, Pruszczyk P, Righini M, Torbicki A, Van Belle E, Zamorano JL (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 41:543–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orso D, Paoli I, Piani T, Cilenti FL, Cristiani L, Guglielmo N (2020) Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava to determine fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med 35:354–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao S, Friedman O (2020) Management of right ventricular failure in pulmonary embolism. Crit Care Clin 36:505–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic Internal Medicine and Medical Intensive Care, St.-Antonius-Hospital, Dechant-Deckers-Str. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Germany

    Uwe Janssens

Authors
  1. Uwe Janssens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Janssens.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07011-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssens, U. Central venous pressure not appropriate to guide volume administration in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism. Intensive Care Med 49, 894–895 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07094-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07094-9

Search

Navigation