Log in

Understanding hypovolaemia

  • Understanding the Disease
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelman S (2008) Venous function and central venous pressure: a physiologic story. Anesthesiology 108:735–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Magder S (2012) Bench-to-bedside review: an approach to hemodynamic monitoring—Guyton at the bedside. Crit Care 16:236

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vallee F, Mari A, Perner A, Vallet B (2010) Combined analysis of cardiac output and CVP changes remains the best way to titrate fluid administration in shocked patients. Intensive Care Med 36:912–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cecconi M, Aya HD, Geisen M, Ebm C, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A (2013) Changes in the mean systemic filling pressure during a fluid challenge in postsurgical intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med 39:1299–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Vincent JL, Backer D (2013) Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 369:1726–1734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A (2009) Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 37:2642–2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY (2012) Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care 16:R188

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, La Torre G, Mannocci A, de Waure C, Bello G, Maviglia R, Antonelli M (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 36:1475–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2008) Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 34:659–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent JL, Weil MH (2006) Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 34:1333–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perner A, Haase N, Wiis J, White JO, Delaney A (2010) Central venous oxygen saturation for the diagnosis of low cardiac output in septic shock patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54:98–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Perrotin D, Wolff M, Boulain T (2013) Fluid challenge: tracking changes in cardiac output with blood pressure monitoring (invasive or non-invasive). Intensive Care Med 39:1953–1962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL (2012) Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock? Intensive Care Med 38:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Both authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Perner.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perner, A., De Backer, D. Understanding hypovolaemia. Intensive Care Med 40, 613–615 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3223-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3223-x

Keywords

Navigation