Log in

Interdisziplinäre Behandlung der Weichgewebesarkome der Extremitäten

Interdisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Weichgewebesarkome stellen aufgrund ihrer Seltenheit und Heterogenität eine außerordentliche therapeutische Herausforderung dar. Die vollständige chirurgische Entfernung ist und bleibt bei nichtmetastasierten Tumoren die Standardtherapie. Wichtig ist die frühzeitige Einbeziehung interdisziplinärer Therapieansätze durch ein multimodal geschultes Team, um ggf. durch einen chirurgischen Eingriff erst den durch präoperative systemische Chemotherapie und/oder Strahlentherapie devitalisierten Residualtumor zu resezieren. Frühzeitig muss die spätere Funktion der Extremitäten bei der Planung des Eingriffs bedacht werden. Bei lokal fortgeschrittenen T2-Tumoren (> 5 cm), die unter der subkutanen Faszie liegen (T2b) und/oder eine höher maligne Differenzierung (Grading 2 oder 3 nach FNLCC) aufweisen, kann die Operation alleine den Primärtumor i. A. nicht beherrschen. Hier ist eine zusätzliche (neo)adjuvante Therapie sinnvoll und notwendig, und die isolierte Extremitätenperfusion ist heutzutage ein zuverlässiges Standardverfahren. Wichtig ist die frühzeitige Einbeziehung eines in der klinischen Pathologie erfahrenen Pathologen, der nicht nur morphologisch beurteilt, sondern therapierelevante Kenntnisse für Sarkomsubtypen hat. Alveoläre Weichgewebesarkome, solitär fibröse Tumoren, inflammatorische myofibroblastische Tumoren oder das Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans sind z. B. Weichgewebesarkome, die ähnlich wie das Ewing-Sarkom im Kindes- und Jugendalter durch spezielle molekulare Untersuchungen (FISH) anhand genetischer Translokationen identifizierbar sind und einer spezifischen Therapie bedürfen. Festzulegen sind zusammen mit den anderen Disziplinen die Auswahl, Reihenfolge und Intensität der Therapiemodalitäten. Dies betrifft auch die Radikalität und den Zeitpunkt des chirurgischen Eingriffes selbst. Kenntnisse der Effektivität und Toxizität multimodaler Therapien sind daher für den Chirurgen unabdingbar.

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors. Surgery clearly remains the standard therapy of non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. A pretreatment biopsy is necessary to determine the histology and grade of soft tissue sarcomas and to diagnose entities that can be treated by targeted therapies, such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans or alveolar soft tissue sarcoma once they are in a metastatic stage. Nevertheless, locally advanced disease requires multimodal treatment and interdisciplinary treatment decisions. Limb sarcoma of borderline resectability (encasement of vessels, invasion of joints or close proximity to motor nerves) may profit from isolated limb perfusion with recombinant tumor necrosis factor and melphalan. Preoperative chemotherapy may be applied in locally advanced high grade tumors when clear resection margins are difficult to achieve. Deep wave hyperthermia has proven to be a useful addition to systemic chemotherapy in such a neoadjuvant setting. Also preoperative radiation therapy has proven to be effective in controlling locally advanced sarcoma despite higher perioperative morbidity which pays off in the long run by better limb function. Postoperative adjuvant external beam irradiation therapy with the best available technique is recommended for any tumor larger than 5 cm with (FNLCC) grades 2 and 3 (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIb/III). Given all these therapeutic options, it is absolutely crucial that interdisciplinary decision-making starts early in the therapeutic process. Patients are often seen first by the surgeon. For an optimal treatment surgeons need to know the efficacy and toxicity of the multimodal treatment options described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Pencavel TD, Strauss DC, Thomas GP et al (2010) Does the two-week rule pathway improve the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma? A retrospective review of referral patterns and outcomes over five years in a regional sarcoma centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:417–421

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zornig C, Peiper M, Schroder S (1995) Re-excision of soft tissue sarcoma after inadequate initial operation. Br J Surg 82:278–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Funovics PT, Vaselic S, Panotopoulos J et al (2010) The impact of re-excision of inadequately resected soft tissue sarcomas on surgical therapy, results, and prognosis: a single institution experience with 682 patients. J Surg Oncol 102:626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ray-Coquard I, Thiesse P, Ranchere-Vince D et al (2004) Conformity to clinical practice guidelines, multidisciplinary management and outcome of treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Oncol 15:307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi CR, Vecchiato A, Mastrangelo G et al (2013) Adherence to treatment guidelines for primary sarcomas affects patient survival: a side study of the European CONnective TIssue CAncer NETwork (CONTICANET). Ann Oncol 24:1685–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perrier L, Buja A, Mastrangelo G et al (2012) Clinicians‘ adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions. BMC Health Serv Res 12:82

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher CDM (2014) The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours – an update based on the new 2013 WHO classification. Histopathology 64:2–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuville A, Ranchère-Vince D, Dei Tos AP et al (2013) Impact of molecular analysis on the final sarcoma diagnosis: a study on 763 cases collected during a European epidemiological study. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1259–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiore M, Grosso F, Lo Vullo S et al (2007) Myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic liposarcomas: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 109:2522–2531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Vreeze RSA, Jong D de, Haas RL et al (2008) Effectiveness of radiotherapy in myxoid sarcomas is associated with a dense vascular pattern. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(5):1480–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronchi A, Bui BN, Bonvalot S et al (2012) Phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant trabectedin in patients with advanced localized myxoid liposarcoma. Ann Oncol 23:771–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutkowski P, Van Glabbeke M, Rankin CJ et al (2010) Imatinib mesylate in advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: pooled analysis of two phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 28:1772–1779

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mertens F, Antonescu CR, Hohenberger P et al (2009) Translocation-related sarcomas. Semin Oncol 36:312–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garnett MJ, Edelman EJ, Heidorn SJ et al (2012) Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells. Nature 483:570–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Mehren M, Benjamin RS, Bui MM et al (2012) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 10:951–960

    Google Scholar 

  16. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group (2012) Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ et al (2010) The role of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of suspected soft tissue tumours. J Surg Oncol 102:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tunn P-U, Andreou D, Illing H et al (2008) Sentinel node biopsy in synovial sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:704–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinau HU, Steinstrasser L, Hauser J et al (2012) Soft tissue sarcoma: resection and plastic reconstruction. Chirurg 83:673–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gerrand CH, Wunder JS, Kandel RA et al (2001) Classification of positive margins after resection of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb predicts the risk of local recurrence. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1149–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Pisters PW et al (2003) Surgical margins and reresection in the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma using conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 97:2544–2553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hohenberger P, Allenberg JR, Schlag PM, Reichardt P (1999) Results of surgery and multimodal therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma invading to vascular structures. Cancer 85:396–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Al Yami A, Griffin AM, Ferguson PC et al (2010) Positive surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma treated with preoperative radiation: is a postoperative boost necessary? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dagan R, Indelicato DJ, McGee L et al (2012) The significance of a marginal excision after preoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Cancer 118:3199–3207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grabellus F, Kraft C, Sheu S-Y et al (2009) Evaluation of 47 soft tissue sarcoma resection specimens after isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan: histologically characterized improved margins correlate with absence of recurrences. Ann Surg Oncol 16:676–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eggermont AM, Schraffordt Koops H, Klausner JM et al (1997) Isolation limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor alpha and chemotherapy for advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Semin Oncol 24:547–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deroose JP, Eggermont AMM, Geel AN van et al (2011) Long-term results of tumor necrosis factor alpha- and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion in locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 29:4036–4044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lejeune FJ, Lienard D, Matter M, Ruegg C (2006) Efficiency of recombinant human TNF in human cancer therapy. Cancer Immun 6:6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Locksley RM, Killeen N, Lenardo MJ (2001) The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies: integrating mammalian biology. Cell 104:487–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jakob J, Tunn PU, Hayes AJ et al (2014) Oncological outcome of primary non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated by neoadjuvant isolated limb perfusion and tumor resection. J Surg Oncol [Epub ahead of print]

  31. Hohenberger P, Tunn PU (2003) Isolated limb perfusion with rhTNF-alpha and melphalan for locally recurrent childhood synovial sarcoma of the limb. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25:905–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haas RLM, Delaney TF, O’Sullivan B et al (2012) Radiotherapy for management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas: why, when, and where? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R et al (2002) Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2235–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baldini EH, Lapidus MR, Wang Q et al (2013) Predictors for major wound complications following preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk: importance of tumor proximity to skin surface. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1494–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Sullivan B, Griffin AM, Dickie CI et al (2013) Phase 2 study of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce wound and combined modality morbidities in lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 119:1878–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cannon CP, Ballo MT, Zagars GK et al (2006) Complications of combined modality treatment of primary lower extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer 107:2455–2461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kosela H, Kolodziejczyk M, Morysinski T et al (2014) Preoperative hypofractioned Radiotherapy in localized extremity/trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas. http://www.ctos.org/CTOSPresentations/2012%20Presentations/Thursday/Young%20Investigator%20Award/02%205×5%20ost.ppt. Zugegriffen: 03.03.2014

  38. Jakob J, Rauch G, Wenz F, Hohenberger P (2013) Phase I trial of concurrent sunitinib and radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. BMJ Open 3:e003626

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Canter RJ, Borys D, Olusanya A et al (2014) Phase I trial of neoadjuvant conformal radiotherapy plus sorafenib for patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1616–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H et al (2014) Results from a randomized phase III trial of single agent doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamid as first line therapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a survival study by the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group. Lancet Oncol (im Druck)

  41. Issels RD, Lindner LH, Verweij J et al (2010) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised phase 3 multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 11:561–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. P. Hohenberger: Forschungsförderung und Vertragshonorare von Boehringer Ingelheim; J. Jakob: Vertragshonorare von Boehringer Ingelheim; T. Henzler, B. Kasper und A. Marx geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Hohenberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakob, J., Henzler, T., Kasper, B. et al. Interdisziplinäre Behandlung der Weichgewebesarkome der Extremitäten. Chirurg 85, 383–390 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2689-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2689-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation