Abstract
Introduction
There is no conclusive evidence to guide surgical management in the presence of multiple colonic injuries as opposed to a single colonic injury, and whether multiple colonic suture lines are associated with worse outcomes than single suture lines.
Aim
We reviewed the outcomes of penetrating colonic trauma in relation to whether patients had single versus multiple colonic suture lines (primary repair or anastomosis) following laparotomy.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre in South Africa from 2012–2020 for all patients over 18 years who had sustained penetrating colon injury.
Results
541 cases were included: 409 with single suture line and 54 with multiple suture lines. There were no differences between groups in terms of mechanism of injury (gunshot vs stab; p = 0.328), Injury Severity Score (p = 0.071), or Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (p = 0.396). Admission lactate was worse for multiple suture line patients (p = 0.049), but no other blood gas parameters were different, and there was no higher incidence of damage control surgery (p = 0.558) or ICU admission (p = 0.156) for this group. There was a higher rate of diversion in the multiple suture line group (p < 0.001). Univariable logistic regression did not show an increased risk of gastro-intestinal complications, suture line leak rate, or mortality for multiple suture lines compared to single.
Conclusion
It appears that there is no appreciable difference in outcome between patients with a single colonic suture line compared to patients with more than one suture line following trauma laparotomy. In light of this, each injury should be treated on its own merit, in the context of the patient’s overall physiological condition, without undue fear of leaving the patient with more than one colonic suture line. However, judicious use of diversion remains advisable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available for review and transparency.
Change history
08 July 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01994-z
References
De Robles MS, Young CJ. Outcomes of primary repair and anastomosis for traumatic colonic injuries in a tertiary trauma center. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(9):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090440.
Flint LM, Vitale GC, Richardson JD, Polk HC Jr. The injured colon: relationships of management to complications. Ann Surg. 1981;193:619–23.
Moore EE, Dunn EL, Moore JB, Thompson JS. Penetrating abdominal trauma index. J Trauma. 1981;21:439–45.
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Trauma Tools. Injury Scoring Scale. https://www.aast.org/resources-detail/injury-scoring-scale#colon Accessed 2021.04.30.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.
Cullinane DC, Jawa RS, Como JJ, Moore AE, Morris DS, Cheriyan J, et al. Management of penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries: A meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86:505–15.
Fouda E, Emile S, Elfeki H, Youssef M, Ghanem A, Fikry AA, Elshobaky A, Omar W, Khafagy W, Morshed M. Indications for and outcome of primary repair compared with faecal diversion in the management of traumatic colon injury. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(8):O283–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13421.
Clarke DL, Thomson SR, Muckart DJ, Neijenhuis PA. Universal primary colonic repair in the firearm era. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(1):58–61.
Frame SB, Ridgeway CA, Rice JC, McSwain NE Jr, Kerstein MD. Penetrating injuries to the colon: analysis by anatomic region of injury. South Med J. 1989;82(9):1099–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-198909000-00010.
Oosthuizen GV, Kong VY, Estherhuizen T, Bruce JL, Laing GL, Odendaal JJ, Clarke DL. The impact of mechanism on the management and outcome of penetrating colonic trauma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(2):152–6. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0147.
Funding
No funding for research support obtained. No external or internal funding was utilized to generate this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GVO – Principal investigator. JB – Data preparation, data analysis, manuscript preparation. SV – Data preparation, data analysis, manuscript preparation. SRČ – Data preparation, data analysis, manuscript preparation. VYK – Data analysis and manuscript preparation. DC – Data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation. DLC – Supervising author, data analysis, manuscript preparation. JK - Statistical analysis, manuscript preparation. NA - data preparation, manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical
Ethical requirements fulfilled.
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: Modifications have been made to the title, the corresponding author, affiliations and the text of the section author contributions. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the correction for this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oosthuizen, G.V., Klopper, J., Buitendag, J. et al. Penetrating colon trauma – outcomes related to single versus multiple colonic injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 4307–4311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01957-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01957-4