Log in

Justifying the Origin of Real Options and their Difficult Evaluation in Strategic Management

  • Real Options
  • Published:
Schmalenbach Business Review Aims and scope

Abstract

I explore and review the introduction of real options in strategic management studies. My aim is to contribute to a better understanding of the origin of the real options. By distinguishing between shadow and real options and implementing entrepreneurship in the traditional option valuation framework, I obtain a more exhaustive representation of the strategic decision processes in the firm. I explain the creation of a real option as an entrepreneurial process, one which transforms inventive ideas into profitable innovation. This constitutes a step toward an option-based theory of the firm by describing the emergence of a firm’s options and the strategic building of new competencies for exercising these options. In addition, this approach offers a parallel understanding of why the real options theory is less often used in practice than in theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adner, Ron and Daniel A. Levinthal (2004a), What is not a real option: identifying boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy, Academy of Management Review 29, 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, Ron and Daniel A. Levinthal (2004b), Real options and real tradeoffs, Academy of Management Review 29, 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrikopoulos, Andreas (2005), The real-options approach to intellectual capital analysis: a critique, Knowledge and Process Management 12, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. (1986), Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science 32, 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Jay B. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, Humberto (1989), The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory: Disappearance and Explanation, New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. III. (1981), On the measurement of organizational slack, Academy of Management Review 6, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Edward H. and Hurry D. Dileep (1993), Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and incremental choice process, Academy of Management Review 18, 760–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, Lowell W. and Jay B. Barney (1997), Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making, Journal of Business Venturing 12, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Nicholas G. (2002), Unreal Options, Harvard Business Review 80, 12, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Michael D. (1991), Individual learning and organizational routines: emerging connections, Organization Science 2, 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, Patrick and Patrick Llerena (2003), Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm, Industrial and Corporate Change 12, 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, Patrick, Patrick Llerena, and Luigi Marengo (2000), Is there a pilot in the evolutionary theory of the Firm?, in Nicolai J. Foss and Volker Mahnke (eds.), Competence, Governance and Entrepreneurship, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coff, Russell W. and Kevin J. Laverty (2001), Real options on knowledge assets: panacea or Pandora’s box?, Business Horizons 44, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, Nicolai J. (1997), Resources, Firms and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-based Perspective, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, Giovanni, and Daniel A. Levinthal (2000), Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experimental search, Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, Tony (2004), Rejuvenating strategic management: the strategic option grid, Strategic Change 13, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Robert, Gary Pisano, Davide Upton, and Steven Wheelwright (2005), Pursuing the Competitive Edge, New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Sydney D. and Axel J. Jägle (1997), Laboratory Evidence on how managers intuitively value real growth options, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 24, 915–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Isreal (1979), Perception, Opportunity and Profit, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Nalin Kulatilaka (2001), Capabilities as real options, Organization Science 12, 744–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Nalin Kulatilaka (2004), Real options pricing and organizations: The contingent risks of extended theoretical domains, Academy of Management Review 29, 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Richard N. (1992), Transaction-cost economics in real time, Industrial and Corporate Change 1, 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter J. Lane, Marjorie A. Lyles, and Jane E. Salk (1998), Relative Absorptive Capacity, Trust, and Interorganizational Learning in International Joint Ventures, in Michael Hitt, Joan E. Ricart, and Robert D. Nixon (eds.), Managing in an Interconnected World, New York, NY: John Wiley, 373–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiblein, Michael J. (2003), The Choice of organizational governance form and performance: predictions from transaction cost, resource-based, and real options theories, Journal of Management 29, 937–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, Timothy A. (1998), Investment opportunities as real options: getting started on the numbers, Harvard Business Review 76, 4, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, Hugh and Mahem Tampoe (2000), Strategic Management, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1979), Stanford Business School Alumni Association, Stanford GSB, interview with James G. March, 47, 3, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Rita G. (1999), Falling forward: real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure, Academy of Management Review 24, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Kent D. and Zur Shapira (2004), An Empirical test of heuristics and Biases affecting real option valuation, Strategic Management Journal 25, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sydney G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Nooteboom, Bart (2000), Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel (1990), The core competence of corporation, Harvard Business Review 68, 3, 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 18, 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, Lenos (1996), Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Alfred G., James F. Fairbank, and H. Kevin Steensma (2006), Managing uncertainty in a formal standardsbased industry: a real options perspective on acquisition timing, Journal of Management 32, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich (1998), Imagination and leadership: the neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Burger-Helmchen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger-Helmchen, T. Justifying the Origin of Real Options and their Difficult Evaluation in Strategic Management. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 59, 387–405 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396756

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396756

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Navigation