Log in

Neue aggressive Therapiestrategien zur Vermeidung von Wundheilungsstörungen bei DiabetikerInnen nach kardiochirurgischen Eingriffen

New more aggressive therapy strategies for the prevention of wound-healing defects in diabetics after cardiosurgical procedures

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Grundlagen: Rund ein Drittel unserer kardiochirurgischen PatientInnen sind DiabetikerInnen. Gerade diese PatientInnen weisen eine besonders hohe Prädisposition für Wundheilungsstörungen (WHS) und Infektionen auf. Ausgehend von der Portland-Studie vonA. P. Furnary et al. entwickelten wir ein aggressiveres Behandlungskonzept.

Methodik: Zwischen April und Oktober 1999 wurden 25 PatientInnen peri- und postoperativ mittels Perfusor kontinuierlich intravenös mit Insulin substituiert, mit dem Ziel, den Blutglukosespiegel permanent unter 200 mg/dl zu halten. Die Blutzucker-Messungen (BZ-Messungen) wurden 2-stündlich durchgeführt, zweimal täglich wurde der Serumkaliumspiegel kontrolliert. Am 4. postoperativen Tag (POT) wurde auf subkutane Applikationsform umgestellt. Wir verglichen die Ergebnisse mit im selben Zeitraum behandelten, retrospektiv untersuchten DiabetikerInnen, die auf Grund ihrer niederen Ausgangsblutzuckerwerte keine Perfusortherapie benötigten. Bei beiden Gruppen wurde 4–6 Wochen postoperativ eine Wundkontrolle durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse: Der durchschnittliche HbAlc-Wert der intravenösen Gruppe (IV-Gruppe) betrug 7,7 (4,9–12 %), der der subkutanen Gruppe (SC-Gruppe) 7,2 (5,3–9,7 %). 68 % der IV-Gruppe wurden bereits präoperativ mit Insulin substituiert, aber nur 34,6 % der SC-Gruppe. Der mittlere Blutglukosespiegel (in mg/dl) betrug in der IV-Gruppe vs. der SC-Gruppe am 1. POT 191,1 vs. 185,8, am 2. POT 194,8 vs. 189,1, am 3. POT 184,4 vs. 187,6 und am 4. POT 167,4 vs. 179,6. Bei Entlassung fanden sich in der IV-Gruppe 4 % oberflächliche und keine tiefen WHS im Sternalbereich, in der SC-Gruppe fanden sich 5,2 % oberflächliche und 7,6 % tiefe WHS im selben Bereich. In der IV-Gruppe fanden sich 12 % oberflächliche WHS nach Saphenektomie am Bein ohne Entwicklung eines Ulcus cruris, in der SC-Gruppe entwickelten sich 15,4 % WHS nach Saphenektomie, wobei 7,7 % daraus nach 4–6 Wochen ein Ulcus cruris entwickelten.

Schlussfolgerungen: Durch eine aggressivere Behandlung der diabetischen Stoffwechselstörung prä-, peri- und postoperativ und eine dauerhaften Senkung des Blutglukosespiegels unter 200 mg/dl sowie die Verhinderung großer Blutglukoseschwankungen konnte das Risiko einer Wundheilungsstörung minimiert werden, tiefe Wundinfektionen ließen sich gänzlich vermeiden.

Summary

Background: One third of our cardiosurgical patients are diabetics. They clearly have a higher predisposition for wound-healing defects and infections. After studying the Portland-Protocol byA. P. Furnary et al. we developed a more aggressive concept for prevention.

Methods: Between April and October 1999 we treated 25 patients peri- and postoperatively by continuous intravenous substitution of insulin by a perfusor with the aim of a constant bloodglucose-level below 200 mg/dl. Every two hours we controlled the blood glucose level, twice a day the serum-potassium level. On the fourth postoperative day we switched to subcutaneous form of application. We compared the results with diabetics, who were treated in the same period, but were not intravenously substituted because of lower blood glucose levels on arrival. Both groups had a wound control 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively.

Results: The average HbAlc-level of the IV-group was 7.7 (4.9–12), of the subcutan SC-group 7.2 (5.3–9.7). 68 % of the IV-group have had insulin-therapy preoperatively, but only 34.6 % of the SC-group. The average blood-glucose level in mg/dl IV vs. SC was on the first POD 191.1 vs. 185.8, on the second POD 194.8 vs. 189.1, on the third POD 184.4 vs. 1876 and on the fourth POD 167.4 vs. 179.6. When discharged 4 % of the IV-group, but 5.2 % of the SC-group developed superficial healing defects at the chest; 7.6 % of the SC-group developed deep sternal infections but none of the IV-group. 12 % of the IV-group suffered from superficial defects or infections after saphenectomy, none of them developed an ulcus cruris. 15.4 % of the SC-group developed defects after saphenectomy, after 4–6 weeks 7.7 % developed an ulcus cruris.

Conclusions: With a more aggressive treatment of the diabetic metabolic situation pre-, peri- and postoperatively and the resulting stable decrease of blood-glucose levels below 200 mg/dl and the prevention of great fluctuations we could minimize this risk and avoid deep wound infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aldea GS, Gaudiani JM, Shapira OM, Jacobs AK, Weinberg J: Effect of gender on postoperative outcomes and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1097–1103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbir M, Lazem F, Isley C, Mitchell A, Khaghani A, Yacoub M: Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men; risk-factors and in-hospital mortality in a single center. Br Heart J 1994;71:408–412.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Baskett RJ, MacDougall CE, Ross DB: Is mediastinitis a preventable complication? A 10-year review. Ann Throac Surg 1999;67:463–465.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellchambers J, Harris JM, Cullinan P, Gaya H, Pepper JR: A prospective study of wound infection in coronary artery surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:45–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Mariani MA: Improved method for direct coronary gafting without CPB via anteriolateral smal thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;336:1454–1455.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borger MA, Rao V, Weisel RD, Ivanov J, Cohen G, Scully HE: Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1050–1056.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boutoille D, Leautez S, Maulaz D, Krempf M, Raffi F: Skin and osteoarticular bacterial infections of the diabetic: Ulzers of the diabetic foot: epidemiology and physiopathology. Presse Med 2000;26:389–392.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandrup-Wognsen G, Berggren H, Hartford M, Hjalmarson A: Female sex is associated with increased mortality and morbidity early, but not late, after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur Heart J 1996;7:1426–1431.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clement R, Rousou JA, Engelman RM, Breyer RH: Perioperative morbidity in diabetics requiring coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;46:321–323.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis RR, Newton RW, McNeill GP, Fisher BM, Kesson CM: Metabolic control in diabetic subjects following myocardial infarction: difficulties in improving blood glucose levels by intravenous insulin infusion. Scott Med J 1991;36:74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DeCherney GS, Maser RE, Lemole GM, Serra AJ, McNicholas K: Intravenous insulin infusion therapies for postoperative coronary artery bypass graft patients. Del Med J 1998;70:339–404.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DeCherney GS, Maser RE, Lemole GM, Serra AJ, McNicholas KW: Intravenous insulin infusion therapies for postoperativ coronary bypass graft patients. Del Med J 1998;70:399–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diegeler A, Martin M, Kayser S, Binner C, Autschbach R, Battelini R, Krankenberg H, Mohr F: Angiographic results after minimally invasive bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:680–684.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards FH, Carey JS, Grover FL, Bero JW, Hartz RS: Impact of gender on coronary bypass operativ mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:125–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El Oakley R, Paul E, Wong PS, Yohana A, Magee P, Walsby R: Mediastinitis in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass operation — analysis and midterm results. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997;38:595–600.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fietsam RJ, Basset J, Glover J: Complications of coronary artery surgery in diabetic patients. Am Surg 1991;57:551–557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furnary AP: Continius intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;63:365–361.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gadaleta D, Risucci DA, Nelson RL: Effects of morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus on risk of coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1613–1614.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gol MK, Karahan M, Ulus AT, Erdil N, Iscan Z, Karabiber N: Bloodstream, respiratory, and deep surgical wound infection after open heart surgery. J Card Surg 199 813:252–259.

  20. Grossi EA, Esposito R, Harris LJ: Sternal wound infection and use of internal mammaria artery grafts. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:342–347.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall JC, Hall JL, Edwards MG: The time of presentation of wound infection after cardiac surgery. J Qual Clin Pract 1998;18:227–231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammar N, Sandberg E, Larsen FF, Ivert T: Comparison of eraly and late mortality in men and women after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Stockholm, Sweden, 1980–1989. J Am Cardiol 1997;29:659–664.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herlitz J, Wognsen GB, Emanuelsson H, Haglid M, Karlson BW: Mortality and morbidity in diabetic and nondiabetic patients during a 2-year period after coronary-bypass grafting. Diabetes Care 1996;19:698–703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirotani T, Kameda T, Kumamoto T, Shirota S, Yamano M. Effects of coronary artery bypass grafting using internal mammary arteries for diabetic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:532–538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoogwerf BJ, Sheeler LR, Licata AA: Endocrine managment of open heart surgical patient. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;3:75–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hussain KM, Kogan A, Estrada AQ, Kostandy G, Foschi A: Referral pattern and outcome in men and women undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery — a critical review. Angiology 1998;49:243–250.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobs AK, Kelsey SF, Brooks MM, Faxon DP, Chaitman BR, Bittner V: Better outcome for women compared with men undergoing coronary revascularization; a report from the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). Circulation 1998;29:1279–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobs ML, Elte JW, van Ouwerkerk BM, Janssens EN, Schop C: Effect of BMI, insulin dose and number of injections on glycaemic control in insulin using patients. Neth J Med 1997;50:153–159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawasuji M, Sakakibara N, Takahashi M, Tedoriya T, Ueyama: Diabetes mellitus and coronary artery bypass surgery; Nippon Geka Gekkai Zasshi 1992;93:990–992.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawrie GM, Morris GC Jr., Glaeser DH: Influence of diabetes mellitus of coronary bypass suergery. Follow-up of 212 diabetic patients ten to 15 years after surgery. JAMA 1986;256:2967–2971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lilienfeld DE, Vlahov D, Tenney JH, McLaughlin JS: Obesity and diabetes as risk factors for postoperativ wound infections after cardiac surgery. Am J infect Control 1988;16:3–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. M, Singh HP, Dias S, Street J, Aherne T: Coronary artery bypass surgery in the diabetic patient. Ir J Med Sci 1995;164:136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malmberg K, Norhammar A, Wedel H, Rydén L: Glucometabolic state at admission: important risk marker of mortality in conventionally treated patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction: long term results from the diabetes and insulin-glucose infusion in acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI) study. Circulation 1999;99:2626–2632.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mossad SB, Serkey JM, Longworth DL, Cosgrove DM: Coagulase-negative staphylococcal wound infections after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:395–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ovrum E, Tangen G, Am Holen E: Facing the era of minimally invasive coronary gafting: current results of conventional bypass grafting for single-vessel disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pomposelli JJ, Baxter JK, Babineau TJ, Pomfret EA, Driscoll D: Early post-operative glucose control predicts nosocomial infection-rate in diabetic patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1998;22:77–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rassias AJ, Marrin CAS, Arruda J, Whalen PK, Beach M, Yeager MP: Insulin infusion improves neutrophil function in diabetic cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1011–1016.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Salomon NW, Page US, Okies J, Stephens J, Krause AH: Diabetes mellitus and coronary artery bypass. Short-term results, long-term prognosis. J Thorac Cardiocasc Surg 1983;85:264–271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Simchen E, Israeli A, Merin G, Ferderber N: Israeli women were at a higher risk than men for mortality following coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Epidemiol 1997;13:503–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Spelman DW, Russo P, Harrington G, Davis BB, Rabinov M, Smith, Spicer WJ, Esmore D: Risk factors for surgical wound infection and bacteraemia for coronary artery bypass surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70:47–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stahle E, Tammelin A, Bergstrom R, Hambreus A, Nystrom SO: Sternal wound complications — incidence, microbiology and factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:1146–1153.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor GJ, Mikell FL, Moses HW, Dove JT, Katholi RE, Malik SA, Markwell SJ, Korsmeyer C, Schneider JA, Wellons HA: Determinants of hospital charges for coronary artery bypass surgery: the economic consequences of postoperative complications. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:309–313.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. The Diabetic Control and Complication Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The Parisian Meditastinitis Study Group: Risk factors for deep sternal wound infection after sternotomy: a prospective, multicenter study. J Thorac Cardoiovasc Surg 1996;111:1200–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Trick WE, Schreckler WE, Tokars JI, Jones KC, Reppen ML: Modifiable risk factors associated with deep sternal site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:108–114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yasuura K, Matsuura A, Sawazaki M, Maseki T, Okamoto H: Surgical results in diabetics undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Nippon Kyoubu Geka Gekkai Zasshi 1993;41:363–366.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zeer KJ, Furnary AP, Grunkemeier JL, Bookin S, Kanhere V, Starr A: Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:356–361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion H. Avanzini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avanzini, M.H., Reichert, J., Fuchs, U. et al. Neue aggressive Therapiestrategien zur Vermeidung von Wundheilungsstörungen bei DiabetikerInnen nach kardiochirurgischen Eingriffen. Acta Chir. Austriaca 33, 138–142 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949467

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949467

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation