Log in

Relationship between calculated carboplatin area under the curve, using the Cockcroft-Calvert formula and the Chatelut formula, and thrombocytopenia induced by intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background. There is no standard formula to estimate doses for the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of carboplatin. We evaluated a combination of the Cockcroft and the Calvert (Cockcroft-Calvert) formula to determine the area under the curve (AUC) for IP carboplatin co-administered with intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CPM). We also evaluated the correlation of carboplatin clearance determined by the Chatelut formula with carboplatin clearance determined by the Cockcroft-Calvert formula.

Methods. We performed a retrospective study of the records of 149 treatments in 30 patients who received IP carboplatin and IV CPM for ovarian carcinoma. The glomerular filtration rate was calculated with the Cockcroft formula. Carboplatin doses were determined based on the body surface area. The Cockcroft-Calvert formula was used to calculate the AUC. The Chatelut formula was also used to calculate the clearance of carboplatin and the AUC.

Results. The AUC calculated with the Cockcroft-Calvert formula was well correlated to the AUC calculated with the Chatelut formula (r 2 = 0.965). During the first four courses of IP carboplatin combined with IV CPM (300–500mg/m2), the correlation between the percent decrease in platelet count and the calculated carboplatin AUC varied among methods: Cockcroft-Calvert formula AUC:r 2 = 0.460; Chatelut formula AUC:r 2 = 0.431; body surface area dose:r 2 = 0.204; total dose:r 2 = 0.143.

Conclusion. To decrease patient platelet count by 67%, the optimal target AUC following IP administration of carboplatin in combination with 300–500mgCPM/m2IV was calculated as 6.5, using the Cockcroft-Calvert formula, and as 7.5, using the Chatelut formula. Considerable modification of the IP carboplatin dose is required after the fourth course. A prospective study is ongoing to confirm these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Egorin MJ, Van Echo DA, Olman EA, et al. (1984) Pharmacokinetics and dosage reduction of cis-diammine (1, 1-cyclobutane-dicarboxylato) platinum in patients with impaired renal function. Cancer Res 44:5432–5438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbell LA, et al. (1989) Carboplatin dosage: Prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol 7:1748–1756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jodrell DI, Egorin MI, Canetta RM, et al. (1992) Relationship between carboplatin exposure and tumor response and toxicity in patients with ovarian cancer. J Chin Oncol 10:520–528

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Childs WJ, Nicholls EJ, Horwiich A (1992) The optimization of carboplatin dose in carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin combination chemotherapy for good prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis. Ann Oncol 3:291–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Jay NG, et al. (1991) Effectiveness of carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin combination chemotherapy in good-prognosis metastatic testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 9:62–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Newell DR, Eeles RA, Gumbrell LA, et al. (1989) Carboplatin and etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with testicular teratoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 23:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reyno LM, Egorin MJ, Canetta RM, et al. (1993) Impact of CPM on relationships between carboplatin exposure and response or toxicity when used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 11:1156–1164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sorensen BT, Stromgren A, Jakobsen P, Jakobsen A (1991) Dose-toxicity relationship of carboplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 28:397–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujiwara K, Yamauchi H, Sawada S, et al. (1992) The pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal carboplatin (CBDCA) and dose-up study of intravenous cyclophosphamide in combination with intraperitoneal CBDCA for advanced ovarian cancer patients (in Japanese). Jpn J Cancer Chemother 19:2373–2379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chantler C, Garnett ES, Parsons V, Veall N (1969) Glomerular filtration rate measurement in man by single injection method using51Cr-EDTA. Clin Sci 37:169–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chatelut E, Canal P, Brunner V, et al. (1995) Prediction of carboplatin clearance from standard morphological and biological patient characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:573–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rhodes PJ, Rhodes RS, McClelland GH, et al. (1987) Evaluation of eight methods for estimating creatinine clearance in men. Clin Pharm 6:399–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egorin MJ, Van Echo DA, Olman EA, et al. (1985) Prospective validation of a pharmacologically based dosing scheme for the cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) analogue diamminecyclobutane-dicarboxylato-platinum. Cancer Res 45:6502–6506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Taguchi J, Saijo N, Miura K, et al. (1987) Prediction of hematologic toxicity of carboplatin by creatinine clearance rate. Jpn J Cancer Res 78:977–982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvert AH, Newell DR (1993) Carboplatin pharmacokinetics/clinical dosing. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV, et al. (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335:1950–1955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Fujiwara.

About this article

Cite this article

Fujiwara, K., Yamauchi, H., Yoshida, T. et al. Relationship between calculated carboplatin area under the curve, using the Cockcroft-Calvert formula and the Chatelut formula, and thrombocytopenia induced by intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide. Int J Clin Oncol 3, 304–310 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628051

Key words

Navigation