Log in

Dominant mutation in mouse cells associated with resistance to Hoechst 33258 dye, but sensitivity to ultraviolet light and DNA base-damaging compounds

  • Published:
Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

Abstract

A spontaneous derivative of murine Ltk cells has been isolated which has gained a resistance to the cytostatic/lethal effects of high concentrations of Hoechst 33258. The resistant clone HoeR-415 was at least 20-fold more resistant to the dye (D10 dose). HoeR-415 cells have a normal response to X-rays and mitomycin-C and colchicine but were found to show a small sensitivity to UV light, 4NQO, and EMS (1.4, 1.6, and 1.6-fold lower D10 doses, respectively). HoeR-415 cells do not show an increased mutability by EMS. The HoeR phenotype was found to be codominant in hybrids. In order to explain these various characteristics, we suggest that the HoeR-415 mutation may result in an altered topoisomerase activity. Consistent with this we find HoeR-415 cells have an increased sensitivity to novobiocin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Weisblum, B. (1973).Cold Spring Habor Symp. Quant. Biol. 37:441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mikhailov, M.V., Zasedatelev, A.S., Krylov, A.S., and Gurskii, G.V. (1981).Mol. Biol. (Engl. trans.)15:541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, R.F., and Holmes, N. (1983).Nature 302:452–454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harshman, K.D., and Dervan, P.B. (1985).Nucleic Acid Res. 13:4825–4835.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hilwig, I., and Gropp, A. (1972).Exp. Cell Res. 75:122–126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weisblum, B., and Haenssler, E. (1974).Chromosoma 46:255–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilwig, I., and Gropp, A. (1973).Exp. Cell Res. 81:474–477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcus, M., Nielsen, K., Goitein, R., and Gropp, A. (1979).Exp. Cell Res. 122:191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirschberg, J., Lavi, U., Goiten, R., and Marcus, M. (1980).Exp. Cell Res. 130:63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubey, D.D., and Raman, R. (1983).Exp. Cell Res. 149:419–432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Durand, R.E., and Olive, P.L. (1982).J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30:111–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, T.R. (1977).Exp. Cell Res. 104:255–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bontemps, J., Houssier, C., and Fredericq, E. (1975).Nucleic Acid Res. 2:971–984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Latt, S.A., and Stetten, G. (1976).J. Histochem. Cytochem. 24:24–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokke, T., and Steen, H.B. (1985).J. Histochem. Cytochem. 33:333–338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, P.J. (1984).Carcinogenesis 5:1345–1350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, R., Debenham, P.G., Masson, W.K., and Webb, M.B.T. (1986).Mol. Biol. Med. 3:229–244.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huberman, J.A. (1981).Cell 23:647–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis, W.H., and Wright, J.A. (1979).Somat. Cell Genet. 5:83–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mishra, N.C., Hinnant, K., and Cason, E. (1985).Genet. Res. 45:265–277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Debenham, P.G., Webb, M.B.T., Masson, W.K., and Cox, R. (1984).Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 45:525–536.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kit, S., Dubbs, D.R., Piekorski, L.J., and Hsu, T.C. (1963).Exp. Cell Res. 31:297–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Littlefield, J. (1963).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 50:568–573.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lalande, M.E., Ling, V., and Miller, R.G. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:363–367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dollery, A.A., Melvin, W.T., Keir, H.M., and Harris, W.J. (1983).Mutat. Res. 112:33–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tada, M., and Tada, M. (1976).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 454:558–566.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, P.F., Bardwell, E., and Howard-Flanders, P. (1977).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:291–295.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sinden, R.R., and Cole, R.S. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:2373–2377.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Caskey, C.T., and Kruh, G.D. (1979).Cell 16:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thacker, J. (1985).Mutat. Res. 150:431–442.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson, L.H., Busch, D.B., Brookman, K., Mooney, C.L., and Glaser, D.A. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3734–3737.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stamato, T.D., Hinkle, L., Collins, A.R.S., and Waldren, C.A. (1981).Somat. Cell Genet. 7:307–320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takahashi, K., Kaneko, I., Nishi, Y., and Inui, N. (1986).Mutat. Res. 174:279–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Collwill, R.W., and Shenin, R. (1982).Can. J. Biochem. 60:195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Colwill, R.W., and Shenin, R. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:4644–4648.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shenin, R. (1980). InNuclear-Cytoplasmic Interactions in the Cell Cycle, (ed.) Whitson, G.L. (Academic Press, New York), pp. 105–166.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cleaver, J.E., and Bootsma, D. (1975).Annu. Rev. Genet. 9:19–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lehmann, A.R., and Karran, P. (1981).Int. Rev. Cytol. 72:101–146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haseltine, W.A. (1983).Cell 33:13–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thompson, L.H., Rubin, J.S., Cleaver, J.E., Whitmore, G.F., and Brookman, K. (1980).Somat. Cell Genet. 6:391–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindahl, T. (1982).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 51:61–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Karran, P., Hjelmgren, T., and Lindahl, T. (1982).Nature 296:770–773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Strauss, B., Rabkin, S., Sagher, D., and Moore, P. (1982).Biochimie 64:829–838.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schaaper, R.M., Kunkel, T.A., and Loeb, L.A. (1983).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80:487–491.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Philipp, E.M., Wang, T.S.F., Hanawalt, P.C., and Korn, D. (1982).Biochimie 64:783–788.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kunkel, T.A., Schaaper, R.M. and Loeb, L.A. (1983).Biochemistry 22:2378–2384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Edenberg, H.J. (1976).Biophys. J. 16:849–860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dahle, D., Griffiths, T.D., and Carpenter, J.G. (1980).Photochem. Photobiol. 32:157–165.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Collins, A., and Johnson, R. (1979).Nucleic Acid Res. 7:1311–1320.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mattern, M.R., Paone, R.F., and Day, R.S., III. (1982).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 697:6–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Snyder, R.D. (1986).Mutat. Res. 173:279–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Keyse, S.M., and Tyrrell, R.M. (1985).Carcinogenesis 6:1231–1233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Downes, C.S., Ord, M.J., Mullinger, A.M., Collins, A.R.S., and Johnson, R.T. (1985).Carcinogenesis 6:1343–1352.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ross, W.E., and Bradley, M.D. (1981).Biochem. Biophys. Acta 654:129–134.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nelson, E.M., Terrey, K.M., and Liu, L.F. (1984).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81:1361–1365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debenham, P.G., Webb, M.B.T. Dominant mutation in mouse cells associated with resistance to Hoechst 33258 dye, but sensitivity to ultraviolet light and DNA base-damaging compounds. Somat Cell Mol Genet 13, 21–32 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02422296

Keywords

Navigation