Abstract
Estimates of conditional uncertainty, contingent uncertainty, and normed modifications of contingent uncertainty have been proposed for the two-way contingency table. The asymptotic standard errors of the estimates are derived.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attneave, F.Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1959.
Elashoff, J. D. and Dunbar C. R. Measures of Association. Research and Development Memorandum No. 93, School of Education, Stanford University, August 1972.
Garner, W. R.Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1962.
Goodman, L. A. and Kruskal, W. H. Measures of association for cross classifications. IV: Simplification of asymptotic variances.Jounral of the American Statistical Association, 1972,67, 415–421.
McGill, W. and Quastler, H. Standardized nomenclature: An attempt. In H. Quastler (Ed.)Information theory in psychology. New York: The Free Press, 1955, 83–92.
Särndal, C. E. A comparative study of association measures.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 165–187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIH Special Research Resources Grant RR-3.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, M.B. The asymptotic standard errors of some estimates of uncertainty in the two-way contingency table. Psychometrika 40, 291–296 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291759
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291759