Log in

Cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes parthenogenetically activated by puromycin

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Treatment of aged human oocytes by puromycin allows a high rate of parthenogenetic activation and development until the first cleavage division. This technique was used for the study of the chromosome complement of oocytes which remained unfertilized after in vitro fertilization. Three hundred four unfertilized oocytes were treated with 10 Μg/ml puromycin for 6–8 hr and further cultured for 12–15 hr.

Results

Activation occurred in 90.5% of the oocytes. Heterozygous diploids with two pronuclei predominated (61%), which is in contrast to the mouse, where the majority of oocytes activated by puromycin are uniform haploids (89%).

Conclusions

Therefore we conclude that puromycin treatment induces retention of the second polar body in human oocytes, unlike in mouse oocytes treated in the same way. Chromosome analysis performed on 182 oocytes suggested a nondisjunction (ND) rate for the second meiotic division of 12.7%. This is a low figure considering the fact that puromycin itself has been reported to induce nondisjunction. For the first meiotic division a ND rate of only 5.6% was found. This rate is lower than the one found in metaphase II arrested oocytes and we believe that this difference is due to the technical differences between the study of meiotic and that of mitotic chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramczuk JW, Lopata A: Resistance of human follicular oocytes to parthenogenetic activation: DNA distribution and content in oocytes maintained in vitro. Hum Reprod 1990; 5:578–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winston N, Johnson M, Pickering S, Braude P: Parthenogenetic activation and development of fresh and aged human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1991;56:904–912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balakier H, Casper RF: Experimentally induced parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 1993;8:740–743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Cieslak J, Wolf G, Verlinsky Y, Dyban A: Parthenogenetic activation of human oocytes by puromycin. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:328–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Sutter P, Dhont M, Vanluchene E, Vandekerckhove D: Correlations between follicular fluid steroid analysis and maturity and cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes that remained unfertilized after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991;55:958–963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dyban AP: An improved method for chromosome preparations from preimplantation mammalian embryos, oocytes or isolated blastomeres. Stain Technol 1983;58:69–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Siracusa G, Whittingham DG, Molinaro M, Vivarelli E: Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes induced by inhibitors of protein synthesis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1978;43:157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke HJ, Masui Y: The induction of reversible and irreversible chromosome decondensation by protein synthesis inhibition during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1983;97:291–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Sutter P: Non-random chromosome nondisjunction at the first meiotic division induced by puromycin in the mouse.In abstract book of the IXth Meeting of the Contact Group for IVF, National Scientific Research Foundation, Brussels, 1993, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pellestor F: Frequency and distribution of aneuploidy in human female gametes. Hum Genet 1991;86:283–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Angell RR: Predivision in human oocytes failing to fertilise after insemination in vitro. Hum Genet 1991;86:383–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Angell RR, **an J, Keith J: Chromosome anomalies in human oocytes in relation to age. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1047–1054

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamiguchi Y, Rosenbusch B, Sterzik K, Mikamo K: Chromosomal analysis of unfertilized human oocytes prepared by a gradual fixation-air drying method. Hum Genet 1993;90:533–541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman MH: The ovulation and activation of primary and secondary oocytes in Lt/Sv strain mice. Gamete Res 1986; 14:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmiady H, Sperling K, Kentenich H, Stauber M: Prematurely condensed human sperm chromosomes after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Hum Genet 1986;74:441–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmiady H, Kentenich H: Premature chromosome condensation after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1989;4:689–695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balakier H, Casper RF: A morphologic study of unfertilized oocytes and abnormal embryos in human in vitro fertilization. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dyban AP, Noniashvili EM: Parthenogenetic development of mouse eggs activated by heat shock. Ontogenez 1986;17:587–598

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Procházka R, Kaňka J, šutovský P, Fulka J, Motlík J: Development of pronuclei in pig oocytes activated by a single electric pulse. J Reprod Fert 1992;96:725–734

    Google Scholar 

  20. Balakier H, Tarkowski: Diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by heat shock and cytochalasin B. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1976;35:25–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Sutter, P., Dozortsev, D., Vrijens, P. et al. Cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes parthenogenetically activated by puromycin. J Assist Reprod Genet 11, 382–388 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211723

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211723

Key words

Navigation